Bioactive glass/polymer composite materials with mechanical properties matching those of cortical bone

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 572-579

  Koleganova, Veronika A ^a   Bernier, Suzanne M ^a   Dixon, S Jeffrey ^a   Rizkalla, Amin S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bioactive glass composites; Cell material interactions; Dynamic young's modulus; Osteoblasts; Silane

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; ELASTIC MODULI; GLASS; OSTEOBLASTS; SILANES;

BIOACTIVE GLASS COMPOSITES; CELL-MATERIAL INTERACTIONS; DYNAMIC YOUNG'S MODULUS;

COMPOSITE MATERIALS;

BIOMATERIAL; GLASS; POLYETHERURETHAN; POLYMACON; POLYMER;

ADSORPTION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY; WETTABILITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CELL LINE, TUMOR; GLASS; OSTEOBLASTS; POLYMERS; RATS; SILANES;

EID: 34547755940     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30561     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Burr DB, Robling AG, Turner CH. Effects of biomechanical stress on bones in animals. Bone 2002;30:781-786.
2. An Y, Barfield W, Graughn R. Basic concepts of mechanical property measurement and bone biomechanics. In: An Y, Draughn R, editors. Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000. p 23-40.
3. Katsamanis F, Raftopoulos DD. Determination of mechanical properties of human femoral cortical bone by the Hopkinson bar stress technique. J Biomech 1990;23:1173-1184.
4. Neil Dong X, Edward Guo X. The dependence of transversely isotropic elasticity of human femoral cortical bone on porosity. J Biomech 2004;37:1281-1287.
5. Rho JY. An ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of human tibial cortical and cancellous bone. Ultrasonics 1996;34:777-783.
6. Nagels J, Stokdijk M, Rozing PM. Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12:35-39.
7. Wiskott HW, Belser UC. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: A working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:429-444.
8. Ko CC, Douglas WH, DeLong R, Rohrer MD, Swift JQ, Hodges JS, An KN, Ritman EL. Effects of implant healing time on crestal bone loss of a controlled-load dental implant. J Dent Res 2003;82:585-591.
9. Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Binnington AG, Szivek J, Macnab I. Bone ingrowth and stress shielding with a porous surface coated fracture fixation plate. J Biomed Mater Res 1979;13:799-810.
10. Dechow PC, Ellis E III, Throckmorton GS. Structural properties of mandibular bone following application of a bone plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:1044-1051.
11. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003;24:655-665.
12. Klee D, Hocker H. Polymers for biomedical applications: Improvement of the interface compatibility. Adv Polym Sci 1999;149:1-57.
13. Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Ando K, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y. Mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of new bioactive composites consisting of partially crystallized glass beads and poly(methyl methacrylate). J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:556-563.
14. Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y. Bioactive bone cement: Effect of silane treatment on mechanical properties and osteoconductivity. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:277-284.
15. Thompson ID, Hench LL. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, glass-ceramics and composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 1998;212:127-136.
16. Li R, Clark AE, Hench LL. An investigation of bioactive glass powders by sol-gel processing. J Appl Biomater 1991;2:231-239.
17. Arcos D, Greenspan DC, Vallet-Regi M. A new quantitative method to evaluate the in vitro bioactivity of melt and sol-gel-derived silicate glasses. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;65:344-351.
18. Jones DW, Rizkalla AS. Characterization of experimental composite biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;33:89-100.
19. Arkyles B. Tailoring surfaces with silanes. Chemtech 1977;7:766-778.
20. Sideridou I, Achillas DS, Spyroudi C, Karabela M. Water sorption characteristics of light-cured dental resins and composites based on Bis-EMA/PCDMA. Biomaterials 2004;25:367-376.
21. Rizkalla AS, Jones DW. Indentation fracture toughness and dynamic elastic moduli for commercial feldspathic dental porcelain materials. Dent Mater 2004;20:198-206.
22. Partridge NC, Alcorn D, Michelangeli VP, Ryan G, Martin TJ. Morphological and biochemical characterization of four clonal osteogenic sarcoma cell lines of rat origin. Cancer Res 1983;43:4308-4314.
23. Wang YX, Robertson JL, Spillman WB Jr, Claus RO. Effects of the chemical structure and the surface properties of polymeric biomaterials on their biocompatibility. Pharm Res 2004;21:1362-1373.
24. Schneider GB, English A, Abraham M, Zaharias R, Stanford C, Keller J. The effect of hydrogel charge density on cell attachment. Biomaterials 2004;25:3023-3028.
25. Dupraz AM, de Wijn JR, v d Meer SA, de Groot K. Characterization of silane-treated hydroxyapatite powders for use as filler in biodegradable composites. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:231-238.
26. Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, Adey JD. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2002;18:1-11.