Efficient coupling of multibody software with numerical computing environments and block diagram simulators

Multibody System Dynamics

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 237-253

  González, Francisco ^a   González, Manuel ^a   Mikkola, Aki ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

^b LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Block diagram simulators; Cosimulation; Coupling; Efficiency; Multibody; Multiphysics

Indexed keywords

BLOCK DIAGRAM SIMULATORS; BLOCK DIAGRAMS; COMMERCIAL TOOLS; COMPLEX MECHATRONIC SYSTEM; COMPUTATIONAL PERFORMANCE; COSIMULATION; COUPLING METHODS; COUPLING TECHNIQUES; EFFICIENT COUPLING; ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICES; ITS EFFICIENCIES; MATLAB AND SIMULINK; MECHANICAL COMPONENTS; MECHANICAL SIMULATIONS; MODELING AND SIMULATION; MULTI-BODY; MULTI-PHYSICS; MULTIBODY SIMULATIONS; NUMERICAL COMPUTING; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT; SIMULATION SOFTWARE; SIMULATION TIME; TOOL USE;

AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL; EFFICIENCY; MECHATRONICS; SOFTWARE TESTING;

MATLAB;

EID: 80055025154     PISSN: 13845640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11044-010-9199-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Valasek, M.: Modelling, simulation and control of mechatronical systems. In: Arnold, M., Schiehlen,W.(eds.) Simulation Techniques for Applied Dynamics. CISM Courses and Lectures, pp. 75-140. Springer,Wien (2008)
2. Samin, J.C., Bruls, O., Collard, J.F., Sass, L., Fisette, P.: Multiphysics modeling and optimization ofmechatronic multibody systems. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 18, 345-373 (2007) (Pubitemid 47519600)
3. The AEgis Technologies Group, Inc.: ACSLX. http://www.acslsim.com/ (2009)
4. IEEE 1076.1 (VHDL-AMS) Working Group: VHDL-AMS. http://www.eda.org/vhdl- ams/ (2008)
5. Modelica Association: Modelica. http://www.modelica.org/ (2009)
6. The Mathworks, Inc.: MATLAB. http://www.mathworks.com/ (2009)
7. Kubler, R., Schiehlen, W.: Modular simulation in multibody system dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 4,107-127 (2000)
8. SIMPACK AG: SIMPACK. http://www.simpack.com (2009)
9. Vaculin, O., Kruger, W.R., Valasek, M.: Overview of coupling of multibody and control engineeringtools. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 41, 415-429 (2004)
10. Oberschelp, O., Vocking, H.: Multirate simulation of mechatronic systems. In: LCM '04: Proceedingsof the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics 2004, pp. 404-409 (2004) (Pubitemid 40266810)
11. Shome, S.S., Haug, E.J., Jay, L.O.: Dual-rate integration using partitioned Runge-Kutta methods formechanical systems with interacting subsystems. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 32, 253-282 (2004)
12. INRIA: Scilab. http://www.scilab.org/ (2009)
13. Eaton, J.W.: Octave. http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/ (2010)
14. Wolfram Research: Mathematica. http://www.wolfram.com/ (2009)
15. National Instruments: MATRIXx/SystemBuild. http://www.ni.com/matrixx/ what-is-matrixx.htm(2009)
16. Arnold, M.: Numerical methods for simulation in applied dynamics. In: Arnold, M., Schiehlen,W. (eds.)Simulation Techniques for Applied Dynamics. CISM Courses and Lectures, pp. 191-246. Springer,Wien(2008)
17. Busch, M., Arnold, M., Heckmann, A., Dronka, S.: Interfacing SIMPACK to Modelica/Dymola formulti-domain vehicle system simulations. SIMPACK News 11, 1-3 (2007)
18. González, M., González, F., Dopico, D., Luaces, A.: On the effect of Linear algebra implementations inreal-time multibody system dynamics. Comput. Mech. 41, 607-615 (2008) (Pubitemid 350240978)
19. González, F., Luaces, A., Lugrís, U., González, M.: Non-intrusive parallelization of multibody systemdynamic simulations. Comput. Mech. 44, 493-504 (2009)
20. Cuadrado, J., Cardenal, J., Morer, P., Bayo, E.: Intelligent simulation of multibody dynamics: Spacestateand descriptor methods in sequential and parallel computing environments. Multibody Syst. Dyn.4, 55-73 (2000)
21. Cuadrado, J., Gutierrez, R., Naya, M.A., Morer, P.: A comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiencybetween a MBS dynamic formulation with stress analysis and a non-linear FEA code. Int. J. Numer.Methods Eng. 51, 1033-1052 (2001) (Pubitemid 32675963)
22. Cuadrado, J., Dopico, D., González, M., Naya, M.: A combined penalty and recursive real-time formulationfor multibody dynamics. J. Mech. Des. 126, 602-608 (2004)
23. Crossley, P.R., Cook, J.A.: A nonlinear engine model for drivetrain system development. In: InternationalConference on Control (Control 91), vol. 2, pp. 921-925, Edinburg (1991) (Pubitemid 21673986)
24. Anderson, K.S., Critchley, J.H.: Improved 'order-N' performance algorithm for the simulation of constrainedmulti-rigid-body dynamic systems. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 9, 185-212 (2003)
25. González, M., Dopico, D., Lugrís, U., Cuadrado, J.: A benchmarking system for MBS simulationsoftware: Problem standardization and performance measurement. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 16, 179-190(2006) (Pubitemid 44300362)
26. INRIA: Scicos: Block Diagram Modeler/Simulator. http://www.scicos.org/ (2009)
27. Davis, T.A., Stanley, K.: KLU: A Clark Kent sparse LU factorization algorithm for circuit matrices.http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~davis/techreports/KLU/ pp04.pdf (2004)