Comparing functional connectivity via thresholding correlations and singular value decomposition

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 360, Issue 1457, 2005, Pages 913-920

  Worsley, Keith J ^a,b   Chen, Jen I ^b   Lerch, Jason ^b   Evans, Alan C ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Correlation; fMRI; Singular value decomposition

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 25444477857     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1637     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baumgartner, R., Ryner, L., Richter, W., Summers, R., Jarmasz, M. & Somorjai, R. 2000 Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis. Magn. Reson. Imaging 18, 89-94.
2. Cao, J. & Worsley, K. J. 1999 The geometry of correlation fields, with an application to functional connectivity of the brain. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9, 1021-1057.
3. Cordes, D., Haughton, V., Carew, J. D., Arfanakis, K. & Maravilla, K. 2002 Hierarchical clustering to measure connectivity in fMRI resting-state data. Magn. Reson. Imaging 20, 305-317.
4. Gonçalves, M. S. & Hall, D. A. 2003 Connectivity analysis with structural equation modelling: an example of the effects of voxel selection. NeuroImage 20, 1455-1467.
5. Goto, R. et al. 2001 Normal aging and sexual dimorphism of Japanese brain. NeuroImage 13(Suppl. 1), 794.
6. Hampson, M., Peterson, B. S., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J. C. & Gorel, J. C. 2002 Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 247-262.
7. Horwitz, B. 2003 The elusive concept of brain connectivity. NeuroImage 19, 466-470.
8. Koch, M. A., Norris, D. G. & Hund-Georgiadis, M. 2002 An investigation of functional and anatomical connectivity using magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 16, 241-250.
9. McIntosh, A. R., Lobaugh, N. J. 2004 Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances. NeuroImage 23(Supp. 1), S250-S263.
10. van de Ven, V. G., Formisano, E., Prvulovic, D., Roeder, C. H. & Linden, D. E. 2004 Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest. Hum. Brain Mapp. 22, 165-178.
11. Worsley, K. J., Andermann, M., Koulis, T., MacDonald, D. & Evans, A. C. 1999 Detecting changes in nonisotropic images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 98-101.
12. Worsley, K. J., Liao, C., Aston, J. A. D., Petre, V., Duncan, G. H., Morales, F. & Evans, A. C. 2002 A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. NeuroImage 15, 1-15.
13. Worsley, K. J., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., Vandal, A. C., Friston, K. J. & Evans, A. C. 1996 A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human Brain Mapping 4, 58-73.
14. Worsley, K. J., Taylor, J. E., Tomaiuolo, F., Lerch, J. 2004 Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory. NeuroImage 23(Supp. 1), S189-S195.