Analysis of US-Preexposure Effects in Appetitive Conditioning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 495-500

  Franklin, Scott ^a   Hall, Geoffrey ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Appetitive conditioning; Autoshaping; Habituation; Rats; US preexposure

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; APPETITE; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; HABITUATION; LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; MALE; RATS;

RATTUS;

EID: 80054990813     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025484     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bakal C.W., Johnson R.D., Rescorla R.A. The effect of a change in US quality on the blocking effect. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science 1974, 9:97-103.
2. Baker A.G., Mercier P., Gabel J., Baker P.A. Contextual conditioning and the US preexposure effect in conditioned fear. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1981, 7:109-128. 10.1037/0097-7403.7.2.109.
3. Baker A.G., Steinwald H., Bouton M.E. Contextual conditioning and reinstatement of extinguished instrumental responding. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1991, 43B:199-218.
4. Balleine B.W., Dickinson A. The role of incentive learning in instrumental outcome revaluation by sensory-specific satiety. Animal Learning & Behavior 1998, 26:46-59. 10.3758/BF03199161.
5. Balsam P.D., Schwartz A.L. Rapid contextual conditioning in autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1981, 7:382-393. 10.1037/0097-7403.7.4.382.
6. Betts S.L., Brandon S.E., Wagner A.R. Differential blocking of the acquisition of conditioned eyeblink responding and conditioned fear with a shift in US locus. Animal Learning & Behavior 1996, 24:459-470. 10.3758/BF03199017.
7. Blaisdell A.P., Denniston J.C., Miller R.R. Unblocking with qualitative change of unconditioned stimuli. Learning and Motivation 1997, 28:268-279. 10.1006/lmot.1996.0961.
8. Costa D.S.J., Boakes R.A. Context blocking in rat autoshaping; Sign-tracking versus goal-tracking. Learning and Motivation 2009, 40:178-185. 10.1016/j.lmot.2008.11.001.
9. De Brugada I., González F., Gil M., Hall G. The role of habituation of the response to LiCl in the US-preexposure effect. Learning & Behavior 2005, 33:363-370. 10.3758/BF03192864.
10. Dickinson A., Hall G., Mackintosh N.J. Surprise and the attenuation of blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1976, 2:313-322. 10.1037/0097-7403.2.4.313.
11. Engberg L.A., Hansen G., Welker R.L., Thomas D.R. Acquisition of key-pecking via autoshaping as a function of prior experience; "Learned laziness" ?. Science 1972, 178:1002-1004. 10.1126/science.178.4064.1002.
12. Ganesan R., Pearce J.M. Effect of changing the unconditioned stimulus on appetitive blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1988, 14:280-291. 10.1037/0097-7403.14.3.280.
13. Hall G. Preexposure to the unconditioned stimulus in nausea-based aversion learning. Conditioned taste aversion: Behavioral and neural processes 2009, 58-73. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. S. Reilly, T.R. Schachtman (Eds.).
14. Holland P.C. Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1984, 10:476-497.
15. Meiselman H.L., deGraf C., Lesher L.L. The effects of variety and monotony on food acceptance and intake at a midday meal. Physiology & Behavior 2000, 70:119-125. 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00268-7.
16. Pearce J.M., Hall G. The influence of context-reinforcer associations on instrumental performance. Animal Learning & Behavior 1979, 7:504-508. 10.3758/BF03209710.
17. Randich A. The US preexposure phenomenon in the conditioned suppression paradigm: A role for conditioned situational stimuli. Learning and Motivation 1981, 12:321-341. 10.1016/0023-9690(81)90012-6.
18. Randich A., LoLordo V.M. Associative and nonassociative theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon: Implications for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:523-548. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.523.
19. Randich A., Ross R.T. Mechanisms of blocking by contextual stimuli. Learning and Motivation 1984, 15:106-117. 10.1016/0023-9690(84)90018-3.
20. Riley A.L., Simpson G.R. The attenuating effects of drug preexposure on taste aversion conditioning: Generality, experimental parameters, underlying mechanisms, and implications for drug use and abuse. Handbook of contemporary learning theories 2001, 505-559. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. R.R. Mowrer, S.B. Klein (Eds.).
21. Rolls B.J., Rolls E.T., Rowe E.A., Sweeney K. Sensory specific satiety in man. Physiology & Behavior 1981, 27:137-142. 10.1016/0031-9384(81)90310-3.
22. Rolls E.T., de Waal W.L. Long term sensory-specific satiety: Evidence from an Ethiopian refugee camp. Physiology & Behavior 1985, 34:1017-1020. 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90032-0.
23. Timberlake W. Unpredicted food produces a mode of behavior that affects rats' subsequent reactions to a conditioned stimulus: A behavior-system approach to "context blocking." Animal Learning & Behavior 1986, 14:276-286. 10.3758/BF03200068.
24. Tomie A. Interference with autoshaping by prior context conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1976, 2:323-334. 10.1037/0097-7403.2.4.323.
25. van Hest A., van Haaren F., van de Poll N.E. Preexposure to unsignaled food: Autoshaping retardation following differential conditioning of food-tray directed behavior. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1989, 27:351-354.
26. Williams B.A. Blocking despite changes in reinforce identity. Animal Learning & Behavior 1994, 22:442-457. 10.3758/BF03209164.