Characteristics of users of intrauterine devices and other reversible contraceptive methods in the United States

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1138-1144

  Xu, Xin ^a   MacAluso, Maurizio ^a   Frost, Jennifer ^b   Anderson, John E ^a   Curtis, Kathryn ^a   Grosse, Scott D ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CENTER ON BIRTH DEFECTS AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (United States)

Author keywords

demographic characteristics; IUD; multinomial logistic regression; reversible contraceptives; satisfaction

Indexed keywords

INJECTABLE CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTRACEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INCOME; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MARRIAGE; PARITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80054984934     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. L.B. Finer, and S.K. Henshaw Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001 Perspect Sex Reprod Health 38 2006 90 96
2. J.J. Speidel, C.C. Harper, and W.C. Shields The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy Contraception 78 2008 197 200
3. J. Trussell The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States Contraception 75 2007 168 170
4. J. Toivonen, T. Luukkainen, and H. Allonen Protective effect of intrauterine release of levonorgestrel on pelvic infection: three years' comparative experience of levonorgestrel and copper-releasing intrauterine devices Obstet Gynecol 77 1991 261 264
5. P.F. Thonneau, and T. Almont Contraceptive efficacy of intrauterine devices Am J Obstet Gynecol 198 2008 248 253
6. J. Trussell, A.M. Lalla, Q.V. Doan, E. Reyes, L. Pinto, and J. Gricar Cost-effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States Contraception 79 2009 5 14
7. C. d'Arcangues Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception Contraception 75 2007 S2 S7
8. R. Allen, A.B. Goldberg, and D.A. Grimes Expanding access to intrauterine contraception Am J Obstet Gynecol 201 2009 456e1-5
9. D. Cibula Women's contraceptive practices and sexual behaviour in Europe Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 13 2008 362 375
10. W.D. Mosher, and J. Jones Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008 Vital Health Stat 23 29 2010 1 44
11. Xu X, Macaluso M, Ouyang L, Kulczycki A, Grosse S. Revival of the IUD: increased use among U.S. women with employer-sponsored insurance, 2002-2008. Contraception 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.06.007.
12. M. Mintz At any cost: corporate greed, women, and the Dalkon Shield 1985 Pantheon New York
13. R.B. Sobol Bending the law: the story of the Dalkon Shield bankruptcy 1991 University of Chicago Press Chicago
14. D. Hubacher The checkered history and bright future of intrauterine contraception in the United States Perspect Sex Reprod Health 99 2002 275 280
15. D.A. Grimes Intrauterine devices (IUDs) R.A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, A.L. Nelson, W. Cates Jr. F. Stewart, Contraceptive technology 19th ed 2007 Ardent Media Inc New York 117 144
16. D. Hubacher, L.B. Finer, and E. Espey Renewed interest in intrauterine contraception in the United States: evidence and explanation Contraception 83 2011 291 294
17. N.L. Stanwood, J.M. Garrett, and T.R. Konrad Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice Obstet Gynecol 99 2002 275 280
18. T. Madden, J.E. Allsworth, K.J. Hladky, G.M. Secura, and J.F. Peipert Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes Contraception 81 2010 112 116
19. M.A. Angle, L.A. Brown, and P. Buekens IUD protocols for international training Stud Fam Plann 24 1993 125 130
20. D. Hubacher, V. Reyes, S. Lillo, A. Zepeda, P. Chen, and H. Croxatto Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen Am J Obstet Gynecol 195 2006 1272 1277
21. S. Suhonen, M. Haukkamaa, T. Jakobsson, and I. Rauramo Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study Contraception 69 2004 407 412
22. I. Saav, A. Aronsson, L. Marions, O. Stephansson, and K. Gemzell-Danielsson Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial Hum Reprod 22 2007 2647 2652
23. G. Farr, and R. Amatya Contraceptive efficacy of the copper T380A and the multiload Cu250 IUD in three developing countries Adv Contracept 10 1994 137 149
24. G. Farr, and R. Amatya Contraceptive efficacy of the copper T 380A and copper T 200 intrauterine devices: results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing countries Contraception 49 1994 231 243
25. S. Glied, and A. Lleras-Muney Technological innovation and inequality in health Demography 45 2008 741 761
26. A. Lleras-Muney, and F.R. Lichtenberg The effect of education on medical technology adoption: are the more educated more likely to use new drugs? NBER Working Paper 9185 2002 National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA
27. D. Cutler, A. Deaton, and A. Lleras-Muney The determinants of mortality J Econ Perspect 20 2006 97 120
28. B.G. Link, M.E. Northridge, J.C. Phelan, and M.L. Ganz Social epidemiology and the fundamental cause concept: on the structuring of effective cancer screens by socioeconomic status Milbank Q 76 1998 375 402
29. A. Faundes, E. Telles, M. de Lourdes Cristofoletti, D. Faundes, S. Castro, and E. Hardy The risk of inadvertent intrauterine device insertion in women carriers of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis Contraception 58 1998 105 109
30. D.A. Grimes Intrauterine device and upper-genital-tract infection Lancet 356 2000 1013 1019
31. World Health Organization Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use 4th ed 2009 World Health Organization Geneva
32. United Nations. Department of Economics and Social Affairs Population Division. World contraceptive use 2005. New York: United Nations; 2006. ST/ESA/SER.A253/2006.
33. ACOG practice bulletin Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Intrauterine device Obstet Gynecol 105 2005 223 232
34. Committee on Adolescent Health Care Intrauterine device and adolescents Obstet Gynecol 110 2007 1493 1495