Development of a Minimal Kinase Ensemble Receptor (MKER) for Surrogate Autoshim

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2697-2705

  Mukherjee, Prasenjit ^a   Martin, Eric ^a  

^a NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

DOCKING MODELS; KINASE TARGETS; LARGE DATABASE; PREDICTION ACCURACY; PREDICTIVE ACCURACY; STATISTICAL MODELING; VIRTUAL LIBRARIES; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

ENZYMES;

LIGAND; PROTEIN KINASE; PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITOR;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DRUG SCREENING; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS; PROTEIN KINASES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80054959376     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci200234p     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Martin, E. J.; Sullivan, D. C. Surrogate AutoShim: Predocking into a Universal Ensemble Kinase Receptor for Three Dimensional Activity Prediction, Very Quickly, without a Crystal Structure J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 873-881 (Pubitemid 351757752)
2. Martin, E. J.; Sullivan, D. C. AutoShim: empirically correctedsScoring functions for quantitative docking with a crystal structure and IC50 training data J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 861-872 (Pubitemid 351757751)
3. Dong, X.; Ebalunode, J. O.; Cho, S. J.; Zheng, W. A Novel Structure-Based Multimode QSAR Method Affords Predictive Models for Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 240-250
4. Martin, E. J.; Sullivan, D. C. Surrogate AutoShim: predocking into a universal ensemble kinase receptor for three dimensional activity prediction, very quickly, without a crystal structure J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 873-881 (Pubitemid 351757752)
5. Kohavi, R.; John, G. H. Wrappers for feature subset selection Artificial Intelligence 1997, 97, 273-324 (Pubitemid 127401107)
6. Guyon, I.; Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection J. Machine Learning Intell. 2003, 3, 1157-1182
7. Whitney, A. W. A direct method of nonparametric measurement selection IEEE Trans. Comput. 1971, 20, 1100-1103
8. Marill, T.; Green, D. M. On the effectiveness of receptors in recognition systems IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010, 9, 11-17
9. Pudil, P.; Novovicova, J.; Kittler, J. Floating search methods in feature selection Pattern Recognit. Lett. 1994, 15, 1119-1125
10. http://ro.utia.cz/fs/fs-guideline.html (accessed 4/1/ 2011).
11. Somol, P.; Pudil, P. Oscillating search algorithms for feature selection. 15th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona 2000, pp 406-409.
12. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning; Kluwer Academic Publishers: 1989.
13. Von, H. A. Evolutionary Algorithms and their Applications in Chemistry. Handbook of Chemoinformatics; 2010; pp 1239-1280.
14. Rogers, D.; Hopfinger, A. J. Application of Genetic Function Approximation to Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships J. Chem. Inf. Model. 1994, 34, 854-866
15. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748 (Pubitemid 27170693)
16. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662 (Pubitemid 128590223)
17. Kirkpatrick, R. G. C. D.; Vecchi, M. P. Optimization by Simulated Annealing Science. New Series 2010, 220 (4598) 671-680
18. Sutter, J. M.; Dixon, S. L.; Jurs, P. C. Automated Descriptor Selection for Quantitative Structure-Activity-Relationships Using Generalized Simulated Annealing J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 77-84
19. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Cedeno, W. Feature selection for structure-activity correlation using binary particle swarms J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1098-1107 (Pubitemid 34173920)
20. Lin, W. Q.; Jiang, J. H.; Shen, Q.; Shen, G. L.; Yu, R. Q. Optimized block-wise variable combination by particle swarm optimization for partial least squares modeling in quantitative structure-activity relationship studies J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 486-493 (Pubitemid 40635356)
21. Shen, Q.; Jiang, J. H.; Tao, J. c.; Shen, G. L.; Yu, R. Q. Modified Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Variable Selection in QSAR Modeling: QSAR Studies of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 1024-1029 (Pubitemid 41156702)
22. Ferri, F.; Pudil, P.; Hatef, M.; Kittler, J. Comparative study of techniques for large-scale feature selection. In Pattern Recognition in Practice IV; Gelsema, E.,; Kanal, L., Eds.; 1994; pp 403-413.
23. Kudo, M.; Sklansky, J. Comparison of algorithms that select features for pattern classifiers Pattern Recognit. 2000, 33, 25-41 (Pubitemid 32081876)
24. Anil, J. Feature Selection: Evaluation, Application, and Small Sample Performance IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intell. 1997, 19, 153-158
25. DockIt. http://www.metaphorics.com/products/dockit.html (accessed 4/1/ 2011).
26. Mcmartin, C.; Bohacek, R. S. QXP: powerful, rapid computer algorithms for structure-based drug design J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 333-344 (Pubitemid 127506740)
27. Magnet. http://www.metaphorics.com/products/magnet/index.html (accessed 4/1/ 2011).
28. Wehrens, R.; Mevik, B. H. pls: Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) and Principal Component Regression (PCR); R package version 1.2-0, 2006. http://www.cran.r-project.org/ (accessed 4/1/ 2010).