Pop-up depth views for improving 3D target acquisition

Proceedings - Graphics Interface

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 41-48

  Wang, Guangyu ^a   McGuffin, Michael J ^b   Bérard, François ^c   Cooperstock, Jeremy R ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE   (Canada)

^c UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

3D input device; 3D target acquisition; Empirical evaluation; Fitts' law; Interaction design; Pointing facilitation; Popup view

Indexed keywords

3D INPUT DEVICE; 3D TARGET ACQUISITION; EMPIRICAL EVALUATION; FITTS' LAW; INTERACTION DESIGN; POPUP VIEW;

DISPLAY DEVICES; EYE MOVEMENTS; KNOBS; MAMMALS; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 80054940724     PISSN: 07135424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. C. Anclujar and F. Argelaguet. Virtual pads: Decoupling motor space and visual space for flexible manipulation of 2d windows within ves. In 3D User Interfaces, 2007. 3DUI '07. IEEE Symposium on, pages 99-106, Mar. 2007.
2. R. Balakrishnan, T. Baudel, G. Kurtenbach, and G. Fitzmaurice. The Rockin'Mouse: Integral 3D manipulation on a plane. In ACM Confer-ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 311-318. ACM, 1997.
3. F. Bérard, J. Ip, M. Benovoy, D. El-Shimy, J. R. Blum, and J. R. Cooperstock. Did "Minority Report" get it wrong? Superiority of the mouse over 3D input devices in a 3D placement task. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, INTERACT, volume 5727 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter 45, pages 400-414. Springer, 2009.
4. E. A. Bier, M. C. Stone, K. Pier, W. Buxton, and T. D. DeRose. Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface. In ACM Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH), pages 73-80. ACM, 1993.
5. G. Casiez, D. Vogel, R. Balakrishnan, and A. Cockburn. The impact of control-display gain on user performance in pointing tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 23(3):215-250, 2008.
6. D. B. Conner, S. S. Snibbe, K. P. Herndon, D. C. Robbins, R. C. Zeleznik, and A. V. Dam. Three-dimensional widgets. In Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (SlGGRAPH), volume 25, pages 183-188. ACM, 1992.
7. E. R. F. W. Crossman. The speed and accuracy of simple hand movements. Technical report, Department of Engineering Production, University of Birmingham, 1957.
8. N. Elmqvist and J.-D. Fekete. Semantic pointing for object picking in complex 3D environments. In Proceedings of graphics interface (GI), pages 243-250, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 2008. Canadian Information Processing Society.
9. N. Elmqvist and P. Tsigas. A taxonomy of 3d occlusion management techniques. In Virtual Reality Conference, 2007. VR '07. IEEE, pages 51-58, Mar. 2007.
10. L. Findlater, A. Jansen, K. Shinohara, M. Dixon, P. Kamb, J. Rakita, and J. O. Wobbrock. Enhanced area cursors: reducing fine pointing demands for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, UIST ' 10, pages 153-162, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
11. B. Froehlich, J. Hochstrate, V. Skuk, and A. Huckauf. The GlobeFish and the GlobeMouse: two new six degree of freedom input devices for graphics applications. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 191-199. ACM, 2006.
12. T. Grossman and R. Balakrishnan. The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 281-290. ACM, 2005.
13. T. Grossman and R. Balakrishnan. An evaluation of depth perception on volumetric displays. In ACM Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI), pages 193-200. ACM, 2006.
14. G. S. Hubona, G. W. Shirah, and D. K. Jennings. The effects of cast shadows and stereopsis on performing computer-generated spatial tasks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 34(4):483-493, 2004.
15. R. J. K. Jacob, L. E. Sibert, D. C. McFarlane, and J. M. Preston Mullen. Integrality and separability of input devices. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 1(1):3-26, 1994.
16. J. A. Jones, J. E. Swan, II, G. Singh, E. Kolstad, and S. R. Ellis. The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. In Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV), pages 9-14. ACM, 2008.
17. I. S. MacKenzie. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7:91-139, 1992.
18. M. R. Masliah and P. Milgram. Measuring the allocation of control in a 6 degree-of-freedom docking experiment. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 25-32, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM.
19. J.-Y. Oh and W. Stuerzlinger. Moving objects with 2D input devices in CAD systems and desktop virtual environments. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI), pages 195-202. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, 2005. (Pubitemid 43211966)
20. M. Ortega and L. Nigay. AirMouse: Finger gesture for 2D and 3D interaction. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, INTERACT, volume 5727 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter Chapter 28, pages 214-227. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei-delberg, 2009.
21. G. Ramos, A. Cockburn, R. Balakrishnan, and M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Pointing lenses: facilitating stylus input through visual-and motorspace magnification. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '07, pages 757-766, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
22. R. W. Soukoreff and I. S. MacKenzie. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of fitts' law research in hci. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 61:751-789, December 2004.
23. R. Stoakley, M. J. Conway, and R. Pausch. Virtual reality on a wim: interactive worlds in miniature. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '95, pages 265-272, New York, NY, USA, 1995. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
24. R. J. Teather, A. Pavlovych, W. Stuerzlinger, and I. S. MacKenzie. Effects of tracking technology, latency, and spatial jitter on object movement. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, 3DUI '09, pages 43-50, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.
25. R. J. Teather and W. Stuerzlinger. Assessing the effects of orientation and device on (constrained) 3D movement techniques. In IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interface, pages 43-50, 2008.
26. D. Venolia. Facile 3D direct manipulation. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 31-36. ACM, 1993.
27. L. Vlaming, C. Collins, M. Hancock, M. Nacenta, T Isenberg, and S. Carpendale. Integrating 2d mouse emulation with 3d manipulation for visualizations on a multi-touch table. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS '10, pages 221-230, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
28. D. Vogel and P. Baudisch. Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 657-666. ACM, 2007.
29. C. Ware. Using hand position for virtual object placement. The Visual Computer, 6(5):245-253, 1990.
30. C. Ware and D. R. Jessome. Using the bat: a six dimensional mouse for object placement. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI), pages 119-124. Canadian Information Processing Society, 1988.
31. C. Ware and K. Lowther. Selection using a one-eyed cursor in a fish tank VR environment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 4(4):309-322, December 1997.