Ion release from a novel orthodontic resin bonding agent for the reduction and/or prevention of white spot lesions An in vitro study

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 81, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1014-1020

  Brown, Melissa L ^a   Davis, Harry B ^a   Tufekci, Eser ^b   Crowe, Jennifer J ^a   Covell, David A ^a   Mitchell, John C ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioactive glass; Ion release; Orthodontic adhesive; Remineralization; White spot lesions

Indexed keywords

BIOGLASS; CALCIUM; FLUORIDE; ION; PHOSPHATE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SALIVA SUBSTITUTE;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; ION SELECTIVE ELECTRODE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PH; SYNTHESIS; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; VISCOSITY;

CALCIUM; CERAMICS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; FLUORIDES; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; ION-SELECTIVE ELECTRODES; IONS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOSPHATES; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SALIVA, ARTIFICIAL; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ATOMIC; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET; VISCOSITY;

EID: 80054861722     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/120710-708.1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Chang HS, Walsh LJ, Freer TJ. Enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment. Aetiology and prevention. Aust Dent J. 1997;42:322-327. (Pubitemid 127515945)
2. Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:206-210.
3. Lovrov S, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U. Enamel demineraliza-tion during fixed orthodontic treatment-incidence and correlation to various oral-hygiene parameters. J Orofac Orthop. 2007;68:353-363. (Pubitemid 47470763)
4. Øgaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:68-73.
5. O'Reilly MM, Featherstone JD. Demineralization and remin-eralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:33-40.
6. Hallsworth AS, Robinson C, Weatherbell JA. Mineral and magnesium distribution within the approximal carious lesion of dental enamel. Caries Res. 1972;6:156-168.
7. Årtun J, Thylstrup A. A 3-year clinical and SEM study of surface changes of carious enamel lesions after inactivation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:327-333.
8. Benson PE, Shah AA, Millett DT, Dyer F, Parkin N, Vine RS. Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2005;32:102-114.
9. Shamma I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:463-469.
10. Coups-Smith KS, Rossouw PE, Titley KC. Glass ionomer cements as luting agents for orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:436-644.
11. Millett DT, McCabe JF. Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:385-399. (Pubitemid 126421977)
12. Foster JA, Berzins DW, Bradley TG. Bond strength of an amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:339-344.
13. Gaworski M, Weinstein M, Borislow AJ, Braitman LE. Decalcification and bond failure: a comparison of a glass ionomer and a composite resin bonding system in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:518-521.
14. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF, Jakobsen JR. Effect of light-cure time on the initial shear bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:164-168.
15. Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:24-28.
16. Komori A, Ishikawa H. Evaluation of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement for use as an orthodontic bonding agent. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:189-196. (Pubitemid 127534576)
17. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Eliades G. In-vivo vs. in-vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2002;18: 561-569. (Pubitemid 40072225)
18. Hench LL. The story of bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17:967-978.
19. Mitchell JC. In-vivo aging of bioactive glasses and other graft materials. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley W, Watts D, eds. In-Vivo Aging of Dental Biomaterials: Aging and Related Phenomena. Chicago, Ill: Quintessence; 2003: 263-276.
20. Forsback AP, Areva S, Salonen JI. Mineralization of dentin induced by treatment with bioactive glass S534P4 in vitro. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004;62:14-20. (Pubitemid 38391459)
21. Mitchell JC, Astashkina A, Park S, Baumgartner C. Antimicrobial effect of Sol-gel Bioactive glasses. J Dent Res. 2006;85(Spec Iss A):0541.
22. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc. 1938;60:309-319.
23. Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006;27:2907-2915. (Pubitemid 43208916)
24. Kitson RE, Mellon MG. Colourimetric determination of phosphorus as molybdovanadophosphoric acid. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed. 1944;16:379.
25. Dawes C. What is the critical pH and why does a tooth dissolve in acid? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:722-724.
26. Anderson P, Hector MP, Rampersad MA. Critical pH in resting and stimulated whole saliva in groups of children and adults. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11:266-273. (Pubitemid 33673858)
27. Margolis HC, Zhang YP, Lee CY, Kent RL Jr, Moreno EC. Kinetics of enamel demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1326-1335. (Pubitemid 32489294)
28. Meyer JL, Eanes ED. A thermodynamic analysis of amorphous to crystalline calcium phosphate transformation. Calcif Tiss Res. 1978;25:59-68. (Pubitemid 8285970)
29. Fosdick LS, Stark AC. Solubility of tooth enamel in saliva at various pH levels. J Dent Res. 1939;18:417-430.
30. Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro. Caries Res. 1977;11:277-286. (Pubitemid 8129847)
31. Lemke MJ, Churchill PF, Wetzel RG. Effect of substrate and cell surface hydrophobicity on phosphate utilization in bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:913-919.
32. Adams RJ. The effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on the carogenicity, quantity and microscopic morphology of oral lactobacilli. J Oral Med. 1967;22:88-99.
33. Bloom RH, Brown LR Jr. A study of the effects of orthodontic appliances on the oral microbial flora. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1964;17:658-667.
34. Rosenbloom RG, Tinanoff N. Salivary Streptococcus mu-tans levels in patients before, during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100: 35-37.
35. Li YH, Bowden GH. The effect of environmental pH and fluoride from the substratum on the development of biofilms of selected oral bacteria. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1615-1626.