Glass ionomer cements as luting agents for orthodontic brackets

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 436-444

  Coups Smith, K S ^a   Rossouw, P E ^b,d   Titley, K C ^c  

^a Private Practice   (Canada)

^b Baylor University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Orthodontic brackets; Resin reinforced glass ionomer cements; Shear bond strength

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYACRYLIC ACID; RESIN CEMENT; ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALUMINUM SILICATE; CARBOPOL 940; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FUJI ORTHO; FUJI ORTHO LC; RESIN; TRANSBOND XT;

ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ENAMEL; FORCE; INCISOR; INCUBATION TIME; MACHINE; NONHUMAN; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PERFORMANCE; POLYMERIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHEAR STRENGTH; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; MECHANICAL STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0242367989     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beaton WG. Ceramic brackets. Ont Dent. 1990;67:14-15.
2. Fields HW. Bonded resins in orthodontics. Pediatr Dent. 1982;4:51-60.
3. Fricker JP. A 12 month clinical evaluation of a light activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:502-505.
4. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849-853.
5. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments. Progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:901.
6. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171-178.
7. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co.; 1986:294-297.
8. Newman GV. Adhesion and orthodontic plastic attachments. Am J Orthod. 1969;56:573-588.
9. Ostertag AJ, Dhuru VB, Ferguson DJ, Meyer RA. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:251-258.
10. Schiffer A, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Miethke RR. The tensile strength of bracket adhesives depending on the adhesive layer thickness - an in vitro study. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1992;53:297-303.
11. Zachrisson BU. Bonding in orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, eds. Orthodontics - Current Principles and Techniques. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc.; 1994:555-559.
12. Urabe H, Rossouw PE, Titley K, Yamin C. The effect of different acid conditioning agents on metal, ceramic, and polycarbonate brackets bonded to bovine enamel. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:226-274.
13. Diedrich P. Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: a study with the scanning electron microscope. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:500-522.
14. Wang WN, Lu TC. Bond strength with various etching times on young permanent teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:72-79.
15. Koch G, Freiberger P. Fluoride content of outermost enamel layers in teeth exposed to topical fluoride application. Odontol Revy. 1971;22:351-362.
16. Koch G, Petersson LG. Fluoride content of enamel surface treated with a varnish containing sodium fluoride. Odontol Revy. 1972;23:437-446.
17. Brown CR, Way DC. Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:663-671.
18. MacColl G. The Relationship Between Bond Strength and Base Surface Area Using Conventional and Micro-Etched Foil-Mesh Bases [diploma thesis]. Toronto, Ontario: Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto; 1995.
19. Zachrisson BU, Zachrisson S. Caries incidence and oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment. Scand J Dent Res. 1971;79:394-401.
20. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization - Part I: Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:68-73.
21. McCourt JW, Cooley RL, Barnwell S. Bond strength of light cure fluoride-releasing base-liners as orthodontic bracket adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:47-52.
22. Silverman E, Cohen M, Semke RS, Silverman M. A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:231-236.
23. Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ, Benson BJ. Reducing white spot lesions in orthodontic populations with fluoride rinsing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:403-407.
24. Kusy R. Letter to the editor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:17A.
25. Cook PA. Direct bonding with glass ionomer cement. J Clin Orthod. 1990;8:509-511.
26. Fajen VB, Duncanson MG, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Angolkar PV. An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97:316-322.
27. Rezk-Lega F, Ogaard B, Arends J. An in vitro study on the merits of two glass ionomers for the cementation of orthodontic bands. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99:162-167.
28. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
29. Fowler CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Rhodes BF. Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater. 1992;8:265-269.
30. Rossouw PE, Penuvchev AV, Kulkarni K. The influence of various contaminants on the bonding of orthodontic attachments. Out Dent. 1996;73:15-22.
31. Relief DH. Failure at the dental adhesive-etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil. 1974;1:265-284.
32. Zarrinnia K, Eid NM, Kehoe MJ. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:284-293.
33. Brudevold F, Gardner DE, Smith FA. The distribution of fluoride in human enamel. J Dent Res. 1956;35:420-429.
34. Forsten L. Fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res. 1997;85:503-550.