Genome sequence of Haemophilus parasuis strain 29755

Standards in Genomic Sciences

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 61-68

  Mullins, Michael A ^a   Register, Karen B ^a   Bayles, Darrell O ^a   Dyer, David W ^b   Kuehn, Joanna S ^c   Phillips, Gregory J ^c  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gl sser's disease; Haemophilus parasuis; Swine

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); HAEMOPHILUS PARASUIS; PASTEURELLACEAE; SUIDAE;

EID: 80054854748     PISSN: 19443277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2245029     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Rapp-Gabrielson VJ, Oliveira SR, Pijoan C. Hae-mophilus parasuis. In: Straw BE, Zimmerman JJ, D'Allaire S, Taylor DJ (eds), Diseases of Swine, Ninth Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, Iowa, 2006, p. 681-690.
2. Harris DL, Ross RF, Switzer WP. Incidence of cer-tain microorganisms in nasal cavities of swine in Iowa. Am J Vet Res 1969; 30:1621-1624.PubMed
3. Little TW. Haemophilus infection in pigs. Vet Rec 1970; 87:399-402.PubMed doi:10.1136/vr.87.14.399
4. Blanco I, Galina-Pantoja L, Oliveira S, Pijoan C, Sánchez C, Canals A. Comparison between Hae-mophilus parasuis infection in colostrums-deprived and sow-reared piglets. Vet Microbiol 2004; 103:21-27.PubMed doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.06.011
5. Sgales J, Domingo M, Solano GI, Pijoan C. Im-munohistochemical detection of Haemophilus parasuis serovar 5 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of experimentally infected swine. J Vet Diagn Invest 1997; 9:237-243.PubMed doi:10.1177/104063879700900303
6. Solano GI, Segalés J, Collins JE, Molitor TW, Pi-joan C. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syn-drome virus (PRRSv) interaction with Haemophi-lus parasuis. Vet Microbiol 1997; 55:247-257.PubMed doi:10.1016/S0378-1135(96)01325-9
7. Oliveira S, Galina L, Blanco I, Canals A, Pijoan C. Naturally-farrowed, artificially-reared pigs as an alternative model for experimental infection by Haemophilus parasuis. Can J Vet Res 2003; 67:146-150.PubMed
8. Solano-Aguilar GI, Pijoan C, Rapp-Gabrielson V, Collins J, Carvalho LF, Winkelman N. Protective role of maternal antibodies against Haemophilus parasuis infection. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60:81-87.PubMed
9. Rapp-Gabrielson VJ, Gabrielson DA. Prevalence of Haemophilus parasuis serovars among isolates from swine. Am J Vet Res 1992; 53:659-664.PubMed
10. Blackall PJ, Rapp-Gabrielson VJ, Hampson DJ. Serological characterisation of Haemophilus para-suis isolates from Australian pigs. Aust Vet J 1996; 73:93-95. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb09984.x
11. Oliveira S, Pijoan C. Haemophilus parasuis: new trends on diagnosis, epidemiology and control. Vet Microbiol 2004; 99:1-12.PubMed doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.12.001
12. Kilian M. Genus III. Haemophilus. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edi-tion, Volume Two, The Proteobacteria, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 883-904.
13. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the do-mains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576-4579. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576
14. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. Pro-teobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Sys-tematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.
15. List Editor. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effec-tively published outside the IJSEM. List no. 106. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2235-2238.doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64108-0
16. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class III. Gamma-proteobacteria class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.
17. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order XIV. Pasteu-rellales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Sys-tematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 850.
18. List Editor. Validation List no. 7. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1981; 31:382-383.doi:10.1099/00207713-31-3-382
19. Pohl SPD. Dissertation, Phillips-Universität Mar-burg, 1979.
20. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Ap-proved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacte-riol 1980; 30:225-420.doi:10.1099/00207713-30-1-225
21. Winslow CEA, Broadhurst J, Buchanan RE, Krumwiede C, Rogers LA, Smith GH. The Fami-lies and Genera of the Bacteria: Preliminary Re-port of the Committee of the Society of American Bacteriologists on Characterization and Classification of Bacterial Types. J Bacteriol 1917; 2:505-566.PubMed
22. Zinnemann KS, Biberstein EL. Genus Haemophi-lus Winslow, Broadhurst, Buchanan, Krumwiede, Rogers and Smith 1917, 561. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds), Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Eighth Edition, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1974, p. 364-370.
23. Biberstein EL, White DC. A proposal for the establishment of two new Haemophilus species. J Med Microbiol 1969; 2:75-78.PubMed doi:10.1099/00222615-2-1-75
24. Fink DK, St. Geme JW, III. The Genus Haemophi-lus. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K, Stackebrandt E. (eds), The Prokaryotes, A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria: Proteobacteria: Gamma Subclass, Third Edition, Volume 6, Springer, New York, 2006, p. 1034-1061.
25. Kroppenstedt RM, Mannheim W. Lipoquinones in members of the family Pasteurellaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1989; 39:304-308.
26. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, But-ler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-29.PubMed doi:10.1038/75556
27. Ribosomal Database Project. http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/treebuilderpub/treeHelp.jsp
28. Bruno WJ, Socci ND, Halpern AL. Weighted neighbor joining: a likelihood-based approach to distance-based phylogeny reconstruction. Mol Bi-ol Evol 2000; 17:189-197.PubMed
29. Som A. Theoretical foundation to estimate the relative efficiencies of the Jukes-Cantor+gamma model and the Jukes-Cantor model in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree. Gene 2006; 385:103-110.PubMed doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.03.027
30. Morozumi T, Nicolet J. Morphological variations of Haemophilus parasuis strains. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 23:138-142.PubMed
31. Biberstein EL, Gunnarsson A, Hurvell B. Cultural and biochemical criteria for the identification of Haemophilus spp from swine. Am J Vet Res 1977; 38:7-11.PubMed
32. Biberstein EL, Mini PD, Gills MG. Action of Haemophilus cultures on δ-aminolevulinic acid. J Bacteriol 1963; 86:814-819.PubMed
33. Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M. GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26:1107-1115.PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/26.4.1107
34. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, An-giuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541-547.PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt1360
35. Gardy JL, Laird MR, Chen F, Rey S, Walsh CJ, Ester M, Brinkman FS. PSORTb v.2.0: expanded prediction of bacterial protein subcellular locali-zation and insights gained from comparative proteome analysis. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:617-623.PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti057
36. Grant JR, Stothard P. The CGView Server: a com-parative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:W181-W184.PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkn179
37. CGView Server. http://stothard.afns.ualberta.ca/cgview_server/index.html