Significant factors selection in the chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic residues by a genetic algorithm analysis and comparison with the standard Plackett-Burman methodology

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 22, 2011, Pages 10602-10610

  Giordano, Pablo C ^a   Beccaria, Alejandro J ^a   Goicoechea, Héctor C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL LITORAL   (Argentina)

^b Universidad Nacional del Litoral Ciudad Universitaria ^*  (Argentina)

Author keywords

Carbohydrates; Genetic algorithm; Hydrolysis; Plackett Burman design; Significant factors

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM ANALYSIS; ANOVA ANALYSIS; COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC FEEDSTOCKS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC RESIDUES; PINE SAWDUST; PLACKETT-BURMAN; PLACKETT-BURMAN DESIGNS; SIGNIFICANT FACTORS; WHEAT BRAN;

CARBOHYDRATES; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DESIGN; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

LIGNOCELLULOSE;

CARBOHYDRATE; CELLULOSE; CEREAL; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DATA SET; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENETIC ALGORITHM; HYDROLYSIS; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; LIGNIN; OPTIMIZATION; SELECTION; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORN; GENETIC ALGORITHM ANALYSIS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HYDROLYSIS; NONHUMAN; PINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAWDUST; WHEAT BRAN;

ALGORITHMS; CELLULASE; DIETARY FIBER; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PINUS; SULFURIC ACIDS; TRICHODERMA; WASTE PRODUCTS; ZEA MAYS;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 80054843296     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aguilar R., Ramírez J.A., Garrote G., Vázquez M. Kinetic study of the acid hydrolysis of sugar cane bagasse. J. Food Eng. 2002, 55:309-318.
2. Almeida e Silva J.B., Lima U.A., Taqueda M.E.S., Guaragna F.G. Use of response surface methodology for selection of nutrient levels for culturing Paecilomyces variotii in eucalyptus hemicellulosic hydrolyzate. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87:45-50.
3. Bansal P., Hall M., Realff M.J., Lee J.H., Bommarius A.S. Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27:833-848.
4. Borjesson J., Engqvist M., Sipos B., Tjerneld F. Effect of poly(ethylene glycol) on enzymatic hydrolysis and adsorption of cellulase enzymes to pretreated lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 41:186-195.
5. Bower S., Wickramasinghe R., Nagle N.J., Schell D.J. Modeling sucrose hydrolysis in dilute sulfuric acid solutions at pretreatment conditions for lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:7354-7362.
6. Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., Hunter, J.S., 1989. Estadística para experimentadores, Ed. Reverté S.A., Barcelona.
7. Brown, L., Torget, R., 1996. Enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO.
8. Chen M., Xia L.M., Xue P.J. Enzymatic hydrolysis of corncob and ethanol production from cellulosic hydrolysate. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2007, 59:85-89.
9. Chotěborská P., Palmarola-Adrados B., Galbe M., Zacchi G., Melzoch K., Rychtera M. Processing of wheat bran to sugar solution. J. Food Eng. 2004, 61:561-565.
10. Demirbaş A. Aqueous glycerol delignification of wood chips and ground wood. Bioresour. Technol. 1998, 63:179-185.
11. Duffield J. Biodiesel: production and economic issues. Inhalation Toxicol. 2007, 19:1029-1031.
12. Ferreira S., Duarte A.P., Ribeiro M.H.L., Queiroz J.A., Domingues F.C. Response surface optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of Cistus ladanifer and Cytisus striatus for bioethanol production. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 45:192-200.
13. Ghose T.K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59:257-268.
14. Guo G.L., Chen W.H., Chen W.H., Men L.C., Hwang W.S. Characterization of dilute acid pretreatment of silvergrass for ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:6046-6053.
15. Iranmahboob J., Nadim F., Monemi S. Optimizing acid-hydrolysis: a critical step for production of ethanol from mixed wood chips. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 22:401-404.
16. Jeya M., Zhang Y.W., Kim I.W., Lee J.K. Enhanced saccharification of alkali-treated rice straw by cellulase from Trametes hirsuta and statistical optimization of hydrolysis conditions by RSM. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5155-5161.
17. Kaar W.E., Holtzapple M.T. Benefits from Tween during enzymic hydrolysis of corn stover. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 59:419-427.
18. Lu X.B., Zhang Y.M., Yang J., Liang Y. Enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover after pretreatment with dilute sulfuric acid. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2007, 30:938-944.
19. Ma F., Hanna M.A. Biodiesel Production: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 70:1-15.
20. Massart D.L., Vandeginste B.G.M., Buydens L.M.C., De Jong S., Lewi P.J., Smeyers-Verbeke J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A 1997, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
21. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31:426-428.
22. Miller J.N., Miller J.C. Estadística y Quimiometría Para Química Analítica 1993, Prentice Hall, Madrid.
23. Montgomery, D.C., 1991. Diseño y Análisis de Experimentos, Grupo Editorial S. A. de C. V., México.
24. Olivieri A.C., Magallanes J.F. The effect of factor interactions in Plackett-Burman experimental designs. Comparison of Bayesian-Gibbs analysis and genetic algorithms. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2010, 102:8-14.
25. Plackett R.L., Burman J.P. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika 1946, 33:305-325.
26. Rahman S.H.A., Choudhury J.P., Ahmad A.L., Kamaruddin A.H. Optimization studies on acid hydrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber for production of xylose. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:554-559.
27. Ratledge C. Fatty acid biosynthesis in microorganisms being used for single cell oil production. Biochimie 2004, 86:807-815.
28. Sanchez G., Pilcher L., Roslander C., Modig T., Galbe M., Liden G. Dilute-acid hydrolysis for fermentation of the Bolivian straw material Paja Brava. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93:249-256.
29. Spigno G., Pizzorno T., De Faveri D.M. Cellulose and hemicelluloses recovery from grape stalks. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:4329-4337.
30. Sun Y., Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83:1-11.
31. Sun F., Chen H. Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw by aqueous glycerol pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:6156-6161.
32. Tangarone B., Royer J.C., Nakas J.P. Purification and characterization of an Endo-(1, 3)-3-d-glucanase from Trichoderma longibrachiatum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55:177-184.
33. Vieira Canettieri E., Moraes Rocha G.J., Carvalho J.A., Almeida e Silva J.B. Optimization of acid hydrolysis from the hemicellulosic fraction of Eucalyptus grandis residue using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:422-428.
34. Wu J.C.F., Hamada M. Experiments, Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Designs Optimization 2000, Wiley-Interscience Publications, New York.
35. Yang J., Zhang X., Yong Q., Yu S. Three-stage hydrolysis to enhance enzymatic saccharification of steam-exploded corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 101:4930-4935.