The politics of securitization and the muhammad cartoon crisis: A post-structuralist perspective

Security Dialogue

Volumn 42, Issue 4-5, 2011, Pages 357-369

  Hansen, Lene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Copenhagen School; images; Muhammad cartoon crisis; post structuralism; securitization

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054840859     PISSN: 09670106     EISSN: 14603640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0967010611418999     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Asad TIs Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. Asad TBrown WButler BMahmood S, ed. Berkeley, CA: The Townsend Center for the Humanities, University of California, Berkeley; 2009:20-57.
2. Balzacq T.The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context.European Journal of International Relations. 2005;11 (2): 171-201.
3. Butler JGender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge; 1990:.
4. Buzan B,Wæver O.Slippery? Contradictory? Sociologically untenable? The Copenhagen School replies.Review of International Studies. 1997;23 (2): 241-250.
5. Buzan B,Wæver O.Macrosecuritisation and security constellations: Reconsidering scale in securitisation theory.Review of International Studies. 2009;35 (2): 253-276.
6. Buzan B,Wæver O,de Wilde JSecurity: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 1998:.
7. Campbell DWriting Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1992:.
8. Campbell DInternational Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Dunne TKurki MSmith S, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007:203-228.
9. Critical approaches to security in Europe: A networked manifesto.Security Dialogue. 2006;37 (4): 443-487.
10. Transnational Media Events: The Mohammed Cartoons and the Imagined Clash of Civilizations. Eide EKunelius RPhillips A, ed. Gothenburg: Nordicom; 2008:.
11. El-Gourfti F,Hundsbæk T,Thomsen CB.Muhammedsag: Ikke ligefrem en genistreg.Politiken. 2006;:.
12. Floyd RSecurity and the Environment: Securitisation Theory and US Environmental Security Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:.
13. Foucault MThe Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock; 1974:.
14. Foucault MThe History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Vintage; 1978:.
15. Foucault MThe Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault's Thought. Rabinow P, ed. London: Penguin; 1984:76-100.
16. Hansen L.The little mermaid's silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School.Millennium. 2000;29 (2): 285-306.
17. Hansen LSecurity as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge; 2006:.
18. Hansen LInternational Practices. Adler EPouliot V, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011:280-309.
19. Huysmans J.The question of the limit: Desecuritisation and the aesthetics of horror in political realism.Millennium. 1998;27 (3): 569-589.
20. Jyllands-Posten (2005) Truslen fra mørket [The threat from the dark]. 30September.
21. Klausen JThe Cartoons That Shook the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2009:.
22. Laclau E,Mouffe CHegemony & Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso; 1985:.
23. Laustsen CB,Wæver O.In defence of religion: Sacred referent objects for securitization.Millennium. 2000;29 (3): 705-739.
24. Levey GB,Modood T.The Muhammad cartoons and multicultural democracies.Ethnicities. 2009;9 (3): 427-447.
25. Lindekilde L,Mouritsen P,Zapata-Barrero R.The Muhammad cartoons controversy in comparative perspective.Ethnicities. 2009;9 (3): 291-313.
26. McSweeney B.Identity and security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School.Review of International Studies. 1996;22 (1): 81-93.
27. Mahmood SIs Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. Asad TBrown WButler BMahmood S, ed. Berkeley, CA: The Townsend Center for the Humanities, University of California, Berkeley; 2009:64-100.
28. Norris CDerrida. London: Fontana; 1987:.
29. Post R.Religion and the freedom of speech: Portraits of Muhammad.Constellations. 2007;14 (1): 72-90.
30. Rostbøll CF.The use and abuse of 'universal values' in the Danish cartoon controversy.European Political Science Review. 2010;2 (3): 401-422.
31. SaccoJSpiegelmanA (2006) Only pictures?The Nation, 6March. Available at: http://www.thenation.com/article/only-pictures (accessed 7 March 2007).
32. Salter MB.Securitization and desecuritization: A dramaturgical analysis of the Canadian Transport Security Authority.Journal of International Relations and Development. 2008;11 (4): 321-349.
33. Shapiro MThe Politics of Representation: Writing Practices in Biography, Photography, and Politcy Analysis. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press;versity of Wisconsin Press;ournal of International Relations. 2007;13 (3): 357-383.
34. Trombetta MJ.Environmental security and climate change: Analysing the discourse.Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2008;21 (4): 585-602.
35. Vultee F.Securitization: A new approach to the framing of the 'war on terror'.Journalism Practices. 2010;4 (1): 33-47.
36. Vuori JA.Illocutionary logic and strands of securitization: Applying the theory of securitization to the study of non-democratic political orders.European Journal of International Relations. 2008;14 (1): 65-99.
37. Wæver OOn Security. Lipschutz RD, ed. New York: Columbia University Press; 1995:46-86.
38. Wæver O.Securitizing sectors? Reply to Eriksson.Cooperation and Conflict. 1999;34 (3): 334-340.
39. Wæver OEuropean Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States. Hansen LWæver O, ed. London: Routledge; 2002:20-49.
40. Weber C.Performative states.Millennium. 1998;27 (1): 77-95.
41. Williams MC.Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics.International Studies Quarterly. 2003;47 (4): 511-529.