Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: Comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 295-301

  Symes, Richard J ^a   Ursell, Paul G ^a,b  

^a EPSOM AND ST HELIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b FRCOphth   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL AUTOMATED KERATOMETER; CORNEA; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHEIMPFLUG KERATOMETER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMATION; CATARACT EXTRACTION; COHORT STUDIES; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE CARE;

EID: 78751555817     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.050     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. A. Wegener, and H. Laser-Junga Photography of the anterior eye segment according to Scheimpflug's principle: options and limitations - a review Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37 2009 144 154
2. J. Santodomingo-Rubido, E.A.H. Mallen, B. Gilmartin, and J.S. Wolffsohn A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry Br J Ophthalmol 86 2002 458 462 Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1771084/pdf/ bjo08600458.pdf Accessed October 23, 2010
3. T. Olsen Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85 2007 84 87 Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00774.x/pdf Accessed October 23, 2010
4. B. Seitz, and A. Lagenbucher Intraocular lens calculations status after corneal refractive surgery Curr Opin Ophthalmol 11 2000 35 46 (Pubitemid 30060893)
5. J.A. Retzlaff, D.R. Sanders, and M.C. Kraff Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula J Cataract Refract Surg 16 1990 333 340 correction, 528
6. G. Savini, P. Barboni, V. Profazio, M. Zanini, and K.J. Hoffer Corneal power measurements with the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera after myopic excimer laser surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 34 2008 809 813
7. J.T. Holladay, W.E. Hill, and A. Steinmueller Corneal power measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in eyes with prior corneal refractive surgery J Refract Surg 25 2009 862 868
8. T. Kawamorita, H. Uozato, K. Kamiya, L. Bax, K. Tsutsui, D. Aizawa, and K. Shimizu Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement J Cataract Refract Surg 35 2009 127 133
9. E. Borasio, J. Stevens, and G.T. Smith Estimation of true corneal power after keratorefractive surgery in eyes requiring cataract surgery: BESSt formula J Cataract Refract Surg 32 2006 2004 2014
10. Q. Tang, K.J. Hoffer, M.D. Olson, and K.M. Miller Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 35 2009 1198 1203
11. M.S. Reuland, A.J. Reuland, Y. Nishi, and G.U. Auffarth Corneal radii and anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLMaster versus the Pentacam J Refract Surg 23 2007 368 373
12. S.W. Kim, E.K. Kim, B.-J. Cho, S.W. Kim, K.Y. Song, and T.-I. Kim Use of the Pentacam true net corneal power for intraocular lens calculation in eyes after refractive corneal surgery J Refract Surg 25 2009 285 289
13. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307 310 Available at: http://www-users.york.ac.uk/∼mb55/meas/ba.pdf Accessed October 23, 2010
14. G. Savini, P. Barboni, M. Carbonelli, and K.J. Hoffer Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 35 2009 1193 1197 erratum, 1483
15. J. Woodmass, and G. Rocha A comparison of Scheimpflug imaging simulated and Holladay equivalent keratometry values with partial coherence interferometry keratometry measurements in phakic eyes Can J Ophthalmol 44 2009 700 704 Available at: http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/RPAS/rpv?hm=HInit&calyLang= eng&journal=cjo&volume=44&afpf=i09-172.pdf Accessed October 23, 2010
16. U. Elbaz, Y. Barkana, Y. Gerber, I. Avni, and D. Zadok Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements Am J Ophthalmol 143 2007 48 53
17. H.J. Shammas, K.J. Hoffer, and M.C. Shammas Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 35 2009 330 334
18. S. Norrby Pentacam keratometry and IOL power calculation [letter] J Cataract Refract Surg 34 2008 3
19. H. Shankar, D. Taranath, C. Santhirathelagan, and K. Pesudovs Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements J Cataract Refract Surg 34 2008 103 113
20. A. Vogel, H.B. Dick, and F. Krummenauer Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry; intraobserver and interobserver reliability J Cataract Refract Surg 27 2001 1961 1968
21. R.J. Symes, M.J. Say, and P.G. Ursell Scheimpflug keratometry versus conventional automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 36 2010 1107 1114
22. E. Borasio Pentacam keratometry and IOL power calculation [reply to letter by S Norrby] J Cataract Refract Surg 34 2008 4
23. Holladay JT, "Measuring Corneal Power After Corneal Refractive Surgery; How the Pentacam Improves the Accuracy of These Calculations," In: Why Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Need the Pentacam. Insert to Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today January 2006, pages 4-6. Available at: http://www.oculus.de/en/downloads/dyn/sonstige/sonstige/press-cataract-pentacam- 0206pdf. Accessed October 23, 2010