What is open government? One year after the directive

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 262-271

  Linders, Dennis ^a   Wilson, Susan Copeland ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

accountability; e government; open government; open government directive; transparency

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; E-GOVERNMENT; FEDERAL AGENCY; MISSION SUCCESS; OPEN GOVERNMENT; OPEN GOVERNMENT DIRECTIVE; POLICY IMPLICATIONS;

PUBLIC POLICY;

TRANSPARENCY;

EID: 80054792408     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2037556.2037599     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. Obama, Barack H. Transparency and open government. Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies. 2009.
2. Orszag, Peter. Open government directive: Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. 2009.
3. Relyea, Harold C. E-gov: Introduction and overview. Government Information Quarterly, 19, 1 (2002), 9-35.
4. Kundra, Vivek. Removing the Shroud of Secrecy: Making Government More Transparent and Accountable (March 23, 2010). http://www.cio.gov/pages.cfm/page/ Vivek-Kundra-Testimony-Resolving-the-Shroud-of-Secrecy.
5. Drucker, Peter F. The Practice of Management. HarperCollins, New York, 1954.
6. OPENTHEGOVERNMENT.ORG. Secrecy Report Card 2010. 2010.
7. di Maio, Andrea. Gartner Launches Open Government Maturity Model. Gartner.com (June 28, 2010).
8. Bertot, John Carlo, Jaeger, Paul T., Munson, Sean, and Glaisyer, Tom. Engaging the Public in Open Government: Social Media Technology and Policy for Government Transparency. IEEE Computer (In press). www.tmsp.umd.edu/TMSPreports- files/6.IEEE-Computer-TMSP-Government-Bertot-100817pdf.pdf.
9. UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Millennium Declaration. 2000. Available: http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf.
10. Parks, Wallace. The Open Government Principle: Applying the Right to Know Under the Constitution. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 26, 1 (October 1957-1958), 1-22.
11. Pacquette, R. Scott, Jaeger, Paul T., and Wilson, Susan C. Identifying the security risks associated with governmental use of cloud computing. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 3 (2010), 245-253.
12. O'Reilly, Tim. Government As a Platform. 2010. http://opengovernment. labs.oreilly.com/ch01.html.
13. Wilson, Susan C. and Linders, Dennis. The Open Government Directive: A Preliminary Assessment. In iConference 2011 (Seattle 2011), In press.
14. Terris, Ben. Transparency Advocates Excited by Obama's Call for More Congressional Disclosure. National Journal (January 27, 2011).
15. Brandeis, Louis C. Other Peoples' Money. Stokes, New York, 1914.
16. Piotrowski, Suzanne J. Governmental Transparency in the Path of Administrative Reform. SUNY Press, 2007.
17. Perritt, Jr., Henry H. Open Government. Government Information Quarterly, 14, 4 (1997), 397-406. (Pubitemid 127173522)
18. Morrell, Geoff. The Defense Department's Response. New York Times (October 22, 2010). http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/23/world/middleeast/ 23response.html.
19. Löfstedt, Ulrica. e-Government -- Assessment of Current Research and Some Proposals for Future Directions. International Journal of Public Information Systems, 1, 1 (2005), 39-52.
20. O'Reilly, Tim. Gov 2.0: The Promise Of Innovation. Forbes (August 10, 2009).
21. Robinson, D. G, Yu, H., Zeller, W. P, and Felten, E. W. Government data and the invisible hand. Yale Journal of Law \& Technology, 11 (2009), 160.
22. Kundra, V. and Noveck, B. Transparency and Open Government. White House Open Government Initiative Blog (May 21, 2009).
23. Fox, Susannah. Americans living with disability and their technology profile. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011.
24. Bèlanger, France and Carter, Lemuria. Evaluation, The Effects of the Digital Divide on E-Government: An Emperical. In HICSS '06 Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Washington, DC 2006), IEEE Computer Society, 81.3.
25. Ferro, Enrico, Helbig, Natalie C., and Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon. The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 1 (2011), 3-10.
26. Bertot, John Carlo and Jaeger, Paul T. The E-Government paradox: Better customer service doesn't necessarily cost less. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 2 (2008), 149-154.
27. Reitz, John C. E-Government. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 54, 733-754.
28. Prins, Corien. E-government: A Comparative Study of the Multiple Dimensions of Required. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 11, 3 (December 2007).
29. Little, Joseph W. and Tompkins, Thomas. Open Government Laws: An Insider's View. North Carolina Law Review, 53 (1975), 451, 453.
30. Teich, Alfred H. Can administrative measures resolve a political conflict? Public Administration Review, 68, 1 (2008),19-22.
31. Obama, Barack H. Remarks of Senator Barack Obama: Super Tuesday. Organizing for America, Chicago, 2008. http://www.barackobama.com/2008/02/05/ remarks-of-senato r-barack-obam-46.php.
32. Greengard, S. he first internet president. Communications of the ACM, 52, 2 (2009), 16-18.
33. Marks, A. Under Obama, a newly interactive government? Christian Science Monitor (November 13 2009).
34. Noveck, Beth Simone. Wiki-government. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 7 (2008). http://www.democracyjournal.org/7/6570.php?page=2.
35. Curtin, D., & Meijer, A. J. Does transparency strengthen legitimacy? Information Polity, 11, 2 (2006), 109-122.
36. Miller, L. e-Petitions at Westminster: the Way Forward for Democracy? Parliamentary Affairs (2008).
37. Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. Communication and Society, 7, 1 (2001), 1-22.
38. Slocum, Mac. The state of open government in Canada. O'Reilly Radar (March 9, 2010).
39. WHITE HOUSE. Progress Report on Open Government. Washington, DC, 2010.
40. Metcalfe, Daniel J. The nature of government secrecy. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 2 (April 2009), 305-310.
41. Dawes, S., S. Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (2010), 377-383.
42. Gasser, U., Burkert, H., Palfrey, J., and Zittrain, J. Accountability and transparency at ICANN: An independent review. Harvard University, Boston, 2010.
43. Purcell, D. E. Center for Global Standards Analysis, Washington, 2010.
44. Newell, P. and Wheeler, J. Introduction. In Newell, P. and Wheeler, J., eds., Rights, Resources and the Politics of Accountability. Zed Books, London, 2006.
45. Maggs, John. Recovery.gov prepares for major reboot. National Journal (July 18, 2009), 18.
46. von Furstenberg, G. M. Hopes and delusions of transparency. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12 (2001), 205-120.
47. Lessig, Lawrence. Against transparency: The perils of openness in government. The New Republic (October 12, 2009).
48. Feldman, Noah. In defense of secrecy. The New York Times (February 15, 2009), 11.
49. Curtin, D. and Meijer, A. J. Does transparency strengthen legitimacy. Information Polity, 11, 2 (2006), 109-122.
50. Jaeger, Paul T. and Bertot, John C. Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 4 (2010), 371-376.
51. Shafie, D. M. articipation in E-Rulemaking: Interest Groups and the Standard-Setting Process for Hazardous Air Pollutants. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5, 4 (2008), 399-410.
52. Hurrell, C. Civility in Online Discussion: The Case of the Foreign Policy Dialogue. Canadian Journal of Communication, 30, 4 (2006).
53. Whitaker, G.P. Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery. Public Administration Review, 40, 3 (May-Jun 1980).
54. Ryan, Christine and Walsh, Peter. Collaboration of public sector agencies: reporting and accountability challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17, 7 (2004), 621 - 631.
55. Hite, Randolph. Homeland Security: Despite Progress, DHS Continues to Be Challenged in Managing Its Multi-Billion Dollar Annual Investment in Large-Scale Information Technology Systems. GAO-09-1002T, 2009.
56. FEDERAL COMPUTER WEEK. Election aftershocks could hit IT agenda. Washington Technology (November 5, 2010). http://washingtontechnology.com/ articles/2010/11/08/buzz-midterm-elections-federal-it-agenda.aspx?sc-lang=en.
57. Kundra, V. 25 Point Implementation Plan to Reform Federal Information Technology Management. 2010. http://cio.gov/documents/25-Point-Implementation- Plan-to-Reform-Federal%20IT.pdf.
58. Montalbano, Elizabeth. White House Loses Open Government Leader. InformationWeek (January 11, 2011).
59. Sloan, Melanie. CREW Congratulates White House Ethics Counsel Norm Eisen on nomination to be U.S. Ambassador to Czech Republic. Citizens (Blogging) for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (June 29, 2010).
60. Lee, Jooho, Kim, Hyun Joon, and Ahn, Michael J. The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology. Government Information Quarterly (In press).
61. COUNCIL FOR EXCELLENCE IN GOVERNMENT. e-Government: The Next American Revolution. 2001. www.netcaucus.org/books/egov2001/pdf/Bluecove.pdf.
62. McClean, Tom. Who pays the piper? The political economy of freedom of information. Government Information Quarterly, 27 (2010), 392-400.
63. LAKE RESEARCH PARTNERS/TOPOS PARTNERSHIP. Transparency Poll Data Memo. 2009. www.pogo.org/pogo-files/ alerts/government-oversight/go-so-20090204.html.
64. Wilson, Susan C. Show Me the Data: Assessing Transparency in Data.gov and Recovery.gov. First Monday (In review).