Discussion of "A comparison of local and aggregated climate model outputs with observed data": A black eye for the Hydrological Sciences Journal

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1330-1333

  Huard, David ^a  

^a Ouranos Inc ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054788410     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2011.610758     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Anagnostopoulos, G.G., Koutsoyiannis, D., Christofides, A., Efstratiadis, A. and Mamassis, N. (2010) A comparison of local and aggregated climate model outputs with observed data. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (7), 1094-1110. doi:10.1080/02626667.2010.513518.
2. Keenlyside, N.S. and Ba, J., 2010. Prospects for decadal climate prediction. WIREs Climate Change, 1 (5), 627-635. ISSN 1757-7799. doi:10.1002/wcc.69. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/wcc.69.
3. Keenlyside, N.S., Latif, M., Jungclaus, J., Kornblueh, L. and Roeckner, E., 2008. Advancing decadal-scale climate prediction in the North Atlantic sector. Nature, 453 (7191), 84-88. doi:10.1038/nature06921.
4. Koutsoyiannis, D., Efstratiadis, A., Mamassis, N. and Christofides A., 2008. On the credibility of climate predictions. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (4), 671-684.
5. Kundzewicz, Z.W. and Stakhiv, E.Z., 2011. Are climate models "ready for prime time" in water resources management applications, or is more research needed? Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (7), 1085-1089. doi:10.1080/02626667.2010.513211.
6. Lorenz, E.N., 1963. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130-141.
7. 2concentration on the climate of a general circulation model. Progress in Physical Geography, 25, 385-387.
8. McWilliams, J.C., 2007. Irreducible imprecision in atmospheric and oceanic simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (21), 8709-8713. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702971104.
9. Murphy, J., et al., 2009. UK Climate projections science report: Climate change projections. Exeter, UK: Met Office Hadley Centre.
10. Randall, D.A., et al., 2007. Climate models and their evaluation. Chapter in: Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http:// ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html.
11. Scherrer, S.C., 2010. Present-day interannual variability of surface climate in CMIP3 models and its relation to future warming. International Journal of Climatology, doi:10.1002/joc.2170.
12. Smith, D.M., et al., 2007. Improved surface temperature prediction for the coming decade from a global climate model. Science, 317 (5839), 796-799. doi:10.1126/science.1139540.
13. Wang, M., et al., 2007. Intrinsic versus forced variation in coupled climate model simulations over the Arctic during the twentieth century. Journal of Climate, 20 (6), 1093-1107. doi:10.1175/JCLI4043.1.