Event perception

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 608-620

  Radvansky, Gabriel A ^a   Zacks, Jeffrey M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054751146     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.133     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Rosch E, Mervis C, Gray W, Johnson D, Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories Cogn Psychol 1976, 8:382-439.
2. Barwise J, Perry J. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1983.
3. Morrow DG, Bower GH, Greenspan SL. Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. J Mem Lang 1989, 28:292-312.
4. Johnson-Laird PN. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 1983.
5. van Dijk TA, Kintsch W. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press; 1983.
6. Radvansky GA, Copeland DE, Zwaan RA. A novel study: the mental organization of events. Memory 2005, 13:796-814.
7. Wyer RS, Radvansky GA. The comprehension and validation of social information. Psychol Rev 1999, 106:89-118.
8. Zwaan RA, Radvansky GA. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychol Bull 1998, 123:162-185.
9. White KG, Ruske AC, Colombo M. Memory procedures, performance and processes in pigeons. Cogn Brain Res 1996, 3:309-317.
10. Radvansky GA. Spatial directions and situation model organization. Mem Cognit 2009, 37:796-806.
11. Perrig W, Kintsch W. Propositional and situational representations of text. J Mem Lang 1985, 24:503-518.
12. Taylor HA, Tversky B. Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. J Mem Lang 1992, 31:261-292.
13. Borghi AM, Glenberg AM, Kaschak, MP. Putting words in perspective. Mem Cognit 2004, 32:863-873.
14. Nigro G, Neisser U. Point of view in personal memories. Cogn Psychol 1983, 15:467-482.
15. Graesser AC, Zwaan RA. Inference generation and the construction of situation models. In: Weaver CA, Mannes S, Fletcher CR, eds. Discourse Comprehension: Essays in Honor of Walter Kintsch. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum; 1995, 117-139.
16. Epstein R, DeYoe EA, Press DZ, Rosen AC, Kanwisher N. Neurological evidence for a topographical learning mechanism in parahippocampal cortex. Cogn Neuropsychol 2001, 18:481-508.
17. Epstein R, Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
18. Anderson A, Garrod SC, Sanford AJ. The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Q J Exp Psychol 1983, 35A:427-440.
19. Newtson, D. Foundations of attribution: the perception of ongoing behavior. In: Harvey JH, Ickes WJ, Kidd RF, eds. New Directions in Attribution Research, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1976, 223-248.
20. Conway MA. Autobiographical memory. In: Bjork EL, Bjork RA, eds. Memory. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
21. Radvansky GA, Copeland DE, Berish DE, Dijkstra K. Aging and situation model updating aging. Neuropsychol Cogn 2003, 10:158-166.
22. Zwaan RA. Processing narrative time shifts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1996, 22:1196-1207.
23. Barsalou LW. The content and organization of autobiographical memories. In: Neisser U, Winograd U, eds. Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
24. Black JB, Bower GH. Story understanding as problem solving. Poetics 1980, 9:223-250.
25. Omanson RC. An analysis of narratives: identifying central supportive, and distracting content. Discourse Processes 1982, 5:195-224.
26. Radvansky GA, Copeland DE. Working memory and situation model updating. Mem Cognit 2001, 29:1073-1080.
27. Trabasso T, Secco T, van den Broek PW. Causal cohesion and story coherence. In: Mandl H, Stein NL, Trabasso T, eds. Learning and Comprehension of Text. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum; 1984, 83-111.
28. Gernsbacher MA, Goldsmith HH, Robertson RR. Do readers mentally represent characters' emotional states? Cogn Emotion 1992, 6:89-111.
29. Gernsbacher MA, Robertson RR. Knowledge activation versus sentence mapping when representing fictional characters' emotional states. Lang Cogn Processes 1992, 7:353-371.
30. Komeda H, Kawasaki M, Tsunemi K, Kusumi T. Differences between estimating protagonists' emotions and evaluating readers' emotions in narrative comprehension. Cogn Emotion 2009, 23:135-151.
31. Komeda H, Kusumi T. The effect of a protagonist's emotional shift on situation model construction. Mem Cognit 2006, 34:1548-1556.
32. Lutz MF, Radvansky GA. The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension. J Mem Lang 1997, 36:293-310.
33. Magliano JP, Radvansky GA. Goal coordination in narrative comprehension. Psychon Bull Rev 2001, 8:372-376.
34. Radvansky GA, Copeland DE. Functionality and spatial relations in situation models. Mem Cognit 2000, 28:987-992.
35. Franklin N, Tversky B. Searching imagined environments. J Exp Psychol Gen 1990, 119:63-76.
36. Bryant DJ, Tversky B, Franklin N. Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. J Mem Lang 1992, 31:74-98.
37. Wasserman EA. Attribution of causality to common and distinctive elements of compound stimuli. Psychol Sci 1990, 1:298-302.
38. Fenker DB, Waldmann MR, Holyoak KJ. Accessing causal relations in semantic memory. Mem Cognit 2005, 33:1036-1046.
39. Zacks JM, Speer NK, Reynolds JR. Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. J Exp Psychol Gen 2009, 138:307-327.
40. Garrod S, Sanford AJ. On the real-time character of interpretation during reading. Lang Cogn Processes 1989, 1:43-59.
41. Shepard RN, Chipman S. Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: shapes of states. Cognit Psychol 1970, 1:1-17.
42. Zwaan RA. Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1994, 20:920-933.
43. Stine-Morrow EAL, Gagne DD, Morrow DG, DeWall BH. Age differences in rereading. Mem Cognit 2004, 32:696-710.
44. Mandler JM. A code in the node: the use of a story schema in retrieval. Discourse Processes 1978, 1:14-35.
45. Rumelhart DE, Ortony A. The representation of knowledge in memory. In: Anderson RC, Spiro RJ, Montague WE, eds. Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum; 1977.
46. Abelson RP. Psychological status of the script concept. Am Psychol 1981, 36:715-729.
47. Grafman J, Partiot A, Hollnagel C. Fables of the prefrontal cortex. Behav Brain Sci 1995, 18:349-358.
48. Graesser AC, Gordon SE, Sawyer JD. Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities: tests of a script pointer + tag hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:319-332.
49. Graesser AC, Nakamura GV. The impact of schemas on comprehension and memory. In: Bower GH, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 16. New York: Academic Press; 1982.
50. Graesser AC, Woll SB, Kowalski DJ, Smith DA. Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. J Exp Psychol [Hum Learn] 1980, 6:503-515.
51. Nakamura GV, Graesser AC. Memory for script-typical and script-atypical actions: a reaction time study. Bull Psychon Soc 1985, 23:384-386.
52. Trafimow D, Wyer RS Jr. Cognitive representation of mundane social events. Bull Psychon Soc 1993, 64:365-376.
53. Speer NK, Swallow KM, Zacks JM. Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2003, 3:335-345.
54. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1979.
55. Bingham GP, Wickelgren EA. Events and actions as dynamically molded spatiotemporal objects: a critique of the motor theory of biological motion perception. In: Shipley TF, Zacks JM, eds. Understanding Events: From Perception to Action. 2008, 255-286.
56. Zacks JM, Speer NK, Swallow KM, Braver TS, Reynolds JR. Event perception: a mind/brain perspective. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:273-293.
57. Kurby CA, Zacks JM. Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends Cogn Sci 2008, 12:72-79.
58. Zacks JM, Sargent JQ. Event perception: A theory and its application to clinical neuroscience. In: Ross BH, ed. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory; 0079-7421. Vol. 53. San Diego, CA US: Elsevier Academic Press; 2010, 253-299.
59. Zacks JM, Braver TS, Sheridan MA, Donaldson DI, Snyder AZ, Ollinger JM, Buckner RL, Raichle ME. Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nat Neurosci 2001, 4:651-655.
60. Zacks JM, Swallow KM, Vettel JM, McAvoy MP. Visual movement and the neural correlates of event perception. Brain Res 2006, 1076:150-162.
61. Speer NK, Reynolds JR, Zacks JM. Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychol Sci 2007, 18:449-455.
62. Whitney C, Huber W, Klann J, Weis S, Krach S, Kircher T. Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension. NeuroImage 2009, 47:360-366.
63. Speer NK, Zacks JM. Temporal changes as event boundaries: processing and memory consequences of narrative time shifts. J Mem Lang 2005, 53:125-140.
64. Rinck M, Weber U. Who when where: an experimental test of the event-indexing model. Mem Cognit 2003, 31:1284-1292.
65. Swallow KM, Zacks JM, Abrams RA. Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. J Exp Psychol Gen 2009, 138:236-257.
66. Ditman T, Holcomb PI, Kuperberg GF. Time travel through language: temporal shifts rapidly decrease information accessibility during reading. Psychon Bull Rev 2008, 14:750-756.
67. Gernsbacher MA. Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale: Elbaum; 1990.
68. Kintsch W. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychol Rev 1988, 95:163-182.
69. Shipley TF, Zacks JM. eds. Understanding events: From perception to action. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.