The internet and science communication: Blurring the boundaries

ecancermedicalscience

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Warden, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CANCER RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MASS COMMUNICATION; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SCIENCE;

EID: 80054738343     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17546605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2010.203     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Barjak F (2006) The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (10) 1350-1367 doi:10.1002/asi.20454
2. Batts SA et al. (2008) Advancing Science through Conversations: Bridging the Gap between Blogs and the Academy PLoS Biology 6 (9) e240 PMID: 18816167 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060240
3. den Besten M et al. (2010) Research in e-Science and Open Access to Data and Information The International Handbook of Internet Research (Berlin: Springer) pp 65-96
4. Dentzer S (2009) Communicating Medical News - Pitfalls of Health Care Journalism New England Journal of Medicine 360 1-3 doi:10.1056/NEJMp0805753
5. Gene Ontology Consortium (2006) The Gene Ontology (GO) project in 2006 Nucleic Acids Research 34 pp D440-444
6. Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head Nature 438 (7070) 900-901 PMID: 16355180 doi:10.1038/438900a
7. Giordano R (2007) The Scientist: Secretive, Selfish or Reticent? A Social Network Analysis E-Social Science conference Accessed from: http://www.ncess.ac.uk/events/conference//2007/papers/paper166.pdf
8. Hu JC et al. The Emerging World of Wikis Science 320 1289 Accessed from http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/320/5881/1290.pdf
9. Jacsó P (2008) Google Scholar revisited Online Information Review 32 (1) 102-114
10. Jansen BJ and Spink A (2006) How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs Information Processing & Management 42 (1) 248-263 (Pubitemid 41119088)
11. Jensen JD (2008) Scientific Uncertainty in News Coverage of Cancer Research: Effects of Hedging on Scientists' and Journalists' Credibility Human Communication Research 34 347-369
12. Lewison G and Turnbull T (2010) News in brief and features in New Scientist magazine and the biomedical research papers that they cite, August 2008 to July 2009 Scientometrics 85 345-359
13. Nentwich M (2005) Quality control in academic publishing: challenges in the age of cyberscience Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science 3 (3) 181-198
14. Neuhaus C et al. (2006) The Depth and Breadth of Google Scholar: An Empirical Study Libraries and the Academy 6 (2) 127-141
15. Odlyzko A (2002) The rapid evolution of scholarly communication Learned Publishing 15 (1) 7-19
16. Piwowar HA, Day RS and Fridsma DB (2007) Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate PLoS ONE 2 (3) e308 PMID: 17375194
17. Reidpath DD and Allotey PA (2001) Data Sharing in Medical Research: An Empirical Investigation Bioethics 15 (2) 125-134
18. Renear AH and Palmer CL (2009) Strategic Reading, Ontologies, and the Future of Scientific Publishing Science 325 (5942) 828-832 PMID: 19679805
19. Rhee S et al. (2008) Use and misuse of the gene ontology annotations Nature Reviews Genetics 9 (7) 509-515 PMID: 18475267 (Pubitemid 351861540)
20. Rowlands I et al. (2008) The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 60 (4) 290-310
21. Russell JM (2002) Scientific communication at the beginning of the twenty-first century International Social Science Journal 53 (168) 271-282
22. Russell C (1999) Living can be hazardous to your health: How the news media cover cancer risks Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs 25 167-170 PMID: 10854473
23. Savage CJ and Vickers AJ (2009) Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals PloS one 4 (9) e7078
24. Smeaton Z (2007) How to get ahead in a cancer research career New Scientist 195 (2622) 58-61
25. Smith B et al. (2007) The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration Nature Biotechnology 25 (11) 1251-1255 PMID: 17989687 (Pubitemid 350076511)
26. Spasic I et al. (2005) Text mining and ontologies in biomedicine: Making sense of raw text Briefings in Bioinformatics 6 (3) 239-251 PMID: 16212772 (Pubitemid 41614546)
27. Tenopir C et al. (2009) Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns Aslib Proceedings 61 (1) 5-32
28. Tenopir C et al. Scholarly E-reading Patterns in Australia, Finland, and the United States: A Cross Country Comparison. Proceedings of the 74th IFLA General Conference and Council, 10-14 August 2008. Accessed from: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla74/papers/160-Tenopir-Wilson-Vakkari-Talja-King-en. pdf
29. Thomson, H. 'Me-Science': the New e-Science. GRIDtoday, 2006. Accessed from http://www.interactions.org/sgtw/2006/1011/mescience-more.html
30. Vakkari P (2008) Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (4) 602-612
31. Waldrop MM (May 2008) Science 2.0 - Is Open Access Science the Future? Scientific American. PMID: 18444327
32. Walsh JP et al. (2000) Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 (14) 1295-1305 (Pubitemid 32074829)