Strategic reading, ontologies, and the future of scientific publishing

Science

Volumn 325, Issue 5942, 2009, Pages 828-832

  Renear, Allen H ^a   Palmer, Carole L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL IMAGE; LITERATURE REVIEW; PHILOSOPHY; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; READING; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; WORK;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; LIBRARIES, DIGITAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; PUBLISHING; READING; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 68949218995     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1157784     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. I. Spasic, S. Ananiadou, J. McNaught, A. Kumar, Brief. Bioinform. 6, 239 (2005).
2. D. R. Swanson, N. R. Smalheiser, Artif. Intell. 91, 183 (1997).
3. National Library of Medicine, http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/.
4. B. Mons, BMC Bioinform. 6, 142 (2005).
5. L. J. Jensen, J. Saric, P. Bork, Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 119 (2006).
6. P. Bourne, PLoS Comput. Biol. 1, e34 (2005).
7. P. Murray-Rust, H. S. Rzepa, J. Digit. Inform. 5, issue 1 (2004).
8. D. Nicholas, P. Huntington, P. Williams, T. Dobrowolski, J. Doc. 60, 24 (2004).
9. D. Nicholas, P. Huntington, H. R. Jamali, T. Dobrowolski, Inf. Process. Manage. 43, 1085 (2007).
10. C. Tenopir, D. W. King, D-Lib Mag. 14, issue 11/12 (2008).
11. B. Schatz et al., Computer 32, 51 (1999).
12. A. P. Bishop, Inf. Process. Manage. 35, 255 (1999).
13. C. L. Palmer, Work at the Boundaries of Science: Information and the Interdisciplinary Research Process (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2001).
14. C. L. Palmer, M. H. Cragin, T. P. Hogan, Inf. Process. Manage. 43, 808 (2007).
15. O. Bodenreider, R. Stevens, Brief. Bioinform. 7, 256 (2006).
16. L. Strömbäck, D. Hall, P. Lambrix, Proteomics 7, 857 (2007).
17. M. Ashburner et al., Nat. Genet. 25, 25 (2000).
18. B. Smith et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1251 (2007).
19. Gene Ontology, www.geneontology.org/.
20. The examples are from "An Introduction to the Gene Ontology" www.geneontology.org/GO.doc.shtml.
21. World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org/XML/.
22. J. H. Coombs, A. H. Renear, S. J. DeRose, Commun. ACM 30, 933 (1987).
23. A. Renear, D. Dubin, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, C. Huitfeldt, in Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, R. Furuta, J. I. Maletic, E. Muson, Eds. (Association for Computing Machinery Press, New York, 2002), pp. 119-126.
24. World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org/2001/sw/.
25. J. A. Blake, C. J. Bult, J. Biomed. Inform. 39, 314 (2006).
26. J. Blake, Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 773 (2004).
27. M. R. Seringhaus, M. B. Gerstein, BMC Bioinform. 8, 17 (2007).
28. D. Sholton, Learn. Publ. 22, 85 (2009).
29. M. Krallinger, A. Valencia, Genome Biol. 6, 224 (2005).
30. J.-j. Kim, D. Rebholz-Schuhmann, Brief. Bioinform. 9, 452 (2008).
31. H. M. Müller, E. E. Kenny, P. W. Sternberg, PLoS Biol. 2, e309 (2004).
32. R. Hoffmann, A. Valencia, Nat. Genet. 36, 664 (2004).
33. I. Foster, Science 308, 814 (2005).
34. P. Boyce, D. W. King, C. Montgomery, C. Tenopir, Ser. Libr. 46, 121 (2004).
35. D. W. King, C. Tenopir, C. Montgomery, S. E. Aerni, D-Lib Mag. 9, issue 10 (2003).
36. We thank G. Bilder (Crossref), M. Sperberg-McQueen (Black Mesa Technologies), M. Smith (MIT Libraries), and W. J. MacMullen and L. C. Smith (University of Illinois) for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper and L. Teffeau (University of Illinois) for assistance with the examples and illustrations. Earlier versions were presented at the 2006 STM Innovations Seminar (London), the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Chemical Society (Chicago), the 2007 STM Spring Conference (Cambridge, MA), and the 2007 annual meeting of the American Library Association (Washington, DC). This research was supported in part by NSF grant 0222848.