Quantum computational universality of the Cai-Miyake-Dür-Briegel two-dimensional quantum state from Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki quasichains

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Wei, Tzu Chieh ^a,b   Raussendorf, Robert ^a   Kwek, Leong Chuan ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER STATE; COMPUTATIONAL UNIVERSALITY; LOCAL OPERATIONS; LOGICAL QUBITS; MEASUREMENT-BASED QUANTUM COMPUTATION; QUANTUM MAGNETS; QUANTUM STATE; SINGLE-SPIN MEASUREMENT; TWO-DIMENSIONAL CLUSTERS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LOGIC GATES; QUANTUM COMPUTERS; QUANTUM OPTICS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 80054732025     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042333     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. M. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
2. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188 86, 5188 (2001). (Pubitemid 32527770)
3. H. J. Briegel, D. E. Browne, W. Dür, R. Raussendorf, and M. Van den Nest, Nature Phys. PRLTAO 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys1157 5, 19 (2009).
4. H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.910 86, 910 (2001). (Pubitemid 32159821)
5. M. Hein, J. Eisert, and H.-J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062311 69, 062311 (2004).
6. M. Van den Nest, A. Miyake, W. Dür, and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.150504 97, 150504 (2006). (Pubitemid 44570410)
7. D. Gross, S. T. Flammia, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190501 102, 190501 (2009);
8. M. J. Bremner, C. Mora, and A. Winter, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190502 102, 190502 (2009).
9. D. Gross and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.220503 98, 220503 (2007); (Pubitemid 47139735)
10. D. Gross, J. Eisert, N. Schuch, and D. Perez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.052315 76, 052315 (2007); (Pubitemid 350137035)
11. D. Gross and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.040303 82, 040303 (2010).
12. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.060302 70, 060302 (2004). (Pubitemid 40213784)
13. Measurement-based quantum computation with these new resource states take place in the so-called "correlation space" rather than the Hilbert space of physical qubits; see Ref..
14. S. D. Bartlett and T. Rudolph, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.040302 74, 040302 (2006). (Pubitemid 44631125)
15. X. Chen, B. Zeng, Z.-C. Gu, B. Yoshida, and I. L. Chuang, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.220501 102, 220501 (2009).
16. J.-M. Cai, A. Miyake, W. Dür, and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.052309 82, 052309 (2010).
17. T.-C. Wei, I. Affleck, and R. Raussendorf, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.070501 106, 070501 (2011);
18. e-print arXiv: 1009.2840 (unpublished).
19. A. Miyake, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1016/j.aop.2011.03. 006 326, 1656 (2011).
20. M. A. Nielsen, Rep. Math. Phys. RMHPBE 0034-4877 10.1016/S0034-4877(06) 80014-5 57, 147 (2005).
21. I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.799 59, 799 (1987);
22. I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Comm. Math. Phys. CMPHAY 0010-3616 10.1007/BF01218021 115, 477 (1988).
23. G. K. Brennen and A. Miyake, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.010502 101, 010502 (2008).
24. D. Gottesman, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1997 (unpublished).
25. v|ψ=|ψ. One important property of qubit stabilizer operators is that, when the number of independent stabilizer operators equals that of the total number of qubits in |ψ, the state is uniquely determined. If there is one less independent stabilizer, then the state is only determined up to a subspace of an effective qubit. For details, see Ref.
26. X. Chen, R. Duan, Z. Ji, and B. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.020502 105, 020502 (2010).
27. 2 before measurement.
28. Y. Li, D. E. Browne, L. C. Kwek, R. Raussendorf, and T.-C. Wei, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.060501 107, 060501 (2011).
29. D. Gottesman and I. Chuang, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/46503 402, 390 (1999).
30. M. Van den Nest, W. Dür, A. Miyake, and H. J. Briegel, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/204 9, 204 (2007). (Pubitemid 47146359)
31. J.-M. Cai, W. Dür, M. Van den Nest, A. Miyake, and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.050503 103, 050503 (2009).