Linking water stress effects on carbon partitioning by introducing a xylem circuit into L-PEACH

Annals of Botany

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1135-1145

  Da Silva, David ^a   Favreau, Romeo ^a   Auzmendi, Iigo ^b   Dejong, Theodore M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b IRTA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Carbon allocation; Functionalstructural plant modelling; L PEACH; Plant growth simulation; Water stress; Xylem

Indexed keywords

CARBON; WATER;

CARBOHYDRATE; CARBON; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DIURNAL VARIATION; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FRUIT; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; RESPIRATION; TRANSPIRATION; WATER FLOW; XYLEM;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEHYDRATION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FRUIT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; PLANT STEM; PLANT STOMA; SEASON; SOIL; STATISTICAL MODEL; XYLEM;

CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CARBON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEHYDRATION; FRUIT; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT STEMS; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; SEASONS; SOIL; WATER; XYLEM;

EID: 80054702370     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr072     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allen MT, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong TM. 2005. Using L-systems for modeling source-sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-PEACH model. New Phytologist 166: 869-880. (Pubitemid 40717687)
2. Ayars JE, Johnson RS, Phene CJ, Trout TJ, Clark DA, Mead RM. 2003. Water use by drip-irrigated late-season peaches. Irrigation Science 22: 187-194. (Pubitemid 37537821)
3. Ball J, Woodrow LE, Beny JA. 1987. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. Progress in Photosynthesis Research 4: 221-224.
4. Berman ME, DeJong TM. 1996. Water stress and crop load effects on fruit fresh and dry weights in peach (Prunus persica). Tree Physiology 16: 859-864. (Pubitemid 27004948)
5. Berman ME, DeJong TM. 1997. Crop load and water stress effects on daily stem growth in peach (Prunus persica). Tree Physiology 17: 467-472. (Pubitemid 27441972)
6. Bryla DR, Dickson E, Shenk R, Johnson RS, Crisosto CH, Trout TJ. 2005. Influence of irrigation method and scheduling on patterns of soil and tree water status and its relation to yield and fruit quality in peach. HortScience 40: 2118-2124. (Pubitemid 41739313)
7. Chelle M, Andrieu B. 1998. The nested radiosity model for the distribution of light within plant canopies. Ecological Modelling 111: 75-91. (Pubitemid 28422354)
8. Collatz G, Ball J, Grivet C, Berry J. 1991. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 54: 107-136.
9. Da Silva D, Boudon F, Godin C, Sinoquet H. 2008. Multiscale framework for modeling and analyzing light interception by trees. Multiscale Modeling and Simulation 7: 910-933.
10. Daudet F. 2002. Generalized Münch coupling between sugar and water fluxes for modelling carbon allocation as affected by water status. Journal of Theoretical Biology 214: 481-498. (Pubitemid 34948545)
11. DeJong TM, Day KR, Doyle JF, Johnson RS. 1994. The Kearney Agricultural Center perpendicular 'V' (KAC-V) orchard system for peaches and nectarines. HortTechnology 4: 362-367.
12. De Schepper V, Steppe K. 2010. Development and verification of a water and sugar transport model using measured stem diameter variations. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 2083-2099.
13. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. 1980. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149: 78-90.
14. Genard M, Huguet JG. 1996. Modeling the response of peach fruit growth to water stress. Tree Physiology 16: 407-415.
15. Girona J, Mata M, Goldhamer DA, Johnson RS, DeJong TM. 1993. Patterns of soil and tree water status and leaf functioning during regulated deficit irrigation scheduling in peach. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 118: 580-586.
16. Girona J, Marsal J, Lopez G. 2006. Establishment of stem water potential thresholds for the response of 'O'Henry' peach fruit growth to water stress during stage III of fruit development. Acta Horticulturae 713: 197-201. (Pubitemid 44622446)
17. Grossman YL, DeJong TM. 1995. Maximum fruit growth potential following resource limitation during peach growth. Annals of Botany 75: 561-567.
18. Hölttä T, Vesala T, Sevanto S, Perämäki M, Nikinmaa E. 2006. Modeling xylem and phloem water flows in trees according to cohesion theory and Münch hypothesis. Trees - Structure and Function 20: 67-78. (Pubitemid 41831004)
19. Huber SC, Rogers HH, Mowry FL. 1984. Effects of water stress on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) plants grown in the field at different CO2 levels. Plant Physiology 76: 244-249.
20. Johnson SR, Ayars J, Hsiao T. 2004. Improving a model for predicting peach tree evapotranspiration. Acta Horticulturae 664: 341-346.
21. Kim S, Lieth JH. 2003. A coupled model of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration for a rose leaf (Rosa hybrida L.). Annals of Botany 91: 771-781. (Pubitemid 41295736)
22. Lacointe A, Minchin PEH. 2008. Modelling phloem and xylem transport within a complex architecture. Functional Plant Biology 35: 772-780.
23. Lopez G, Mata M, Arbones A, Solans JR, Girona J, Marsal J. 2006. Mitigation of effects of extreme drought during stage III of peach fruit development by summer pruning and fruit thinning. Tree Physiology 26: 469-477. (Pubitemid 43666877)
24. Lopez G, Girona J, Del Campo J, Marsal J. 2007. Effects of relative source-sink position within peach trees on fruit growth under water stress conditions. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 82: 140-148.
25. Lopez G, Favreau R, Smith C, Costes E, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong T. 2008. Integrating simulation of architectural development and source-sink behaviour of peach trees by incorporating Markov chains and physiological organ function submodels into L-PEACH. Functional Plant Biology 35: 761-771.
26. Lopez G, Favreau R, Smith C, DeJong T. 2010. L-PEACH: a computerbased model to understand how peach trees grow. HortTechnology 20: 983-990.
27. Monsi M, Saeki T. 1953. Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion. Japanese Journal of Botany 14: 22-52.
28. 2 O gas exchange model LEAFC3 parameterised and tested for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ecological Modelling 183: 183-210. (Pubitemid 40257055)
29. Münch E. 1927. Dynamike der Saftstromungen. Berichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft 44: 69-71.
30. Nobel PS. 1999. Physicochemical and environmental plant physiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
31. Pagès L, Doussan C, Vercambre G. 2000. An introduction to below-ground environment and resource acquisition, with special reference to trees: simulation models should include plant structure and function. Annals of Forest Science 57: 513-520.
32. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. 1992. Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Prusinkiewicz P. 2004. Art and science for life: designing and growing virtual plants with L-system. Acta Horticulturae 630: 15-28.
34. Prusinkiewicz P, Allen M, Escobar-Gutiérrez A, DeJong TM. 2007. Numerical methods for transport-resistance source-sink allocation models. In: Vos J, de Visser LFM, Struick PC, Evers JB, eds. Functional-structural plant modeling in crop production. Dordrecht: Springer, 123-137.
35. Ross J. 1981. The radiation regime and the architecture of plant stands. The Hague: Dr W. Junk Publishers.
36. Schulze ED. 1986. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and in the soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 37: 247-274.
37. Slatyer R. 1967. Plant-water relationships. New York, NY: Academic Press.
38. Solari LI, DeJong TM. 2006. The effect of root pressurization on water relations, shoot growth, and leaf gas exchange of peach (Prunus persica) trees on rootstocks with differing growth potential and hydraulic conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1981-1989. (Pubitemid 43992247)
39. Solari LI, Johnson S, DeJong TM. 2006. Relationship of water status to vegetative growth and leaf gas exchange of peach (Prunus persica) trees on different rootstocks. Tree Physiology 26: 1333-1341. (Pubitemid 44701008)
40. Soler C, Sillion F, Blaise F, de Reffye P. 2003. An efficient instantiation algorithm for simulating radiant energy transfer in plant models. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22: 204-233. (Pubitemid 44769054)
41. Steudle E, Peterson CA. 1998. How does water get through roots? Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 775-788. (Pubitemid 28226616)
42. Thaler P, Pagès L. 1998. Modelling the influence of assimilate availability on root growth and architecture. Plant and Soil 201: 307-320. (Pubitemid 28378580)
43. Thornley JHM, Johnson IR. 1990. Plant and crop modelling: a mathematical approach to plant and crop physiology. Caldwell, NJ: The Blackburn Press.
44. Tombesi S, Johnson RS, Day KR, DeJong TM. 2010. Relationships between xylem vessel characteristics, calculated axial hydraulic conductance and size-controlling capacity of peach rootstocks. Annals of Botany 105: 327-331.
45. Tyree MT, Ewers FW. 1991. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytologist 119: 345-360.
46. Warren-Wilson J. 1967. Ecological data on dry matter production by plants and plant communities. In: Bradley KM, Denmead OT, eds. The Collection and processing of field data. CSIRO Symposium. New York: Interscience Publishers, 77-123.
47. Warren-Wilson J. 1972. Control of crop processes. In: Rees AR, Cockshull KE, Hand DW, Hurd RG, eds. Control of crop processes. New York: Academic Press, 7-30.