Putting god in the logic model: Developing a national framework for the evaluation of faith-based organizations

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-26

  Janzen, Rich ^a   Wiebe, David ^b  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Canadian Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054692023     PISSN: 08341516     EISSN: 00077720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abma, R.A., & Stake, R.E. (2001). Stake's responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution. New Directions in Evaluation, 92, 7-22.
2. Alkin, M.C., & Christie, C.A. (2004). An evaluation theory tree. In M.C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists' views and influences (pp. 12-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Baszanger, I., & Dodier, N. (2004). Ethnography: Relating the part to the whole. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 9-34). London: Sage.
4. Boddie, S.C., & Cnaan, R.A. (2006). Faith-based social services: Measures, assessments, and effectiveness. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
5. Butler Bass, D. (2006). Christianity for the rest of us: How the neighbourhood church is transforming the faith. New York: Harper Collins.
6. Campbell, D.T. (1974). Qualitative knowing in action research. Kurt Lewin address, Society for the Study of Psychological Issues, American Psychological Association conference, New Orleans.
7. Campbell, D., & Glunt, E. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of faith-based programs: A local network perspective. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 25(3-4), 241-259.
8. Cnaan, R.A., & Boddie, S.C. (2006). Setting the context: Assessing the effectiveness of faith-based social services. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 25(3-4), 5-18.
9. Cahalan, K.A. (2003). Projects that matter: Successful planning and evaluation for religious organizations. Herndon, VA: Alban Institute.
10. Chase, S.E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 651-679). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Chen, H.-T. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Danermark, B. (2001). Interdisciplinary research and critical realism: The example of disability research. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from
15. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Preface and introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. ix-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Dildar, Y., & Janzen, R. (2009). Waterloo Region Immigrant Employment Network (WRIEN) final evaluation report. Kitchener, ON: Centre for Community Based Research.
17. Fagan, P.F., Horn, C., Edwards, C.W., Woods, K.W., & Caprara, C. (2007). Outcome-based evaluation. Faith-based social service organizations and stewardship. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved March 23, 2009, from
18. Ferguson, K.M., Wu, Q., Spruijt-Metz, D., & Dyrness, G. (2007). Outcomes evaluation in faith-based social services: Are we evaluating faith accurately? Research on Social Work Practice, 17(2), 264-276.
19. Fisher, P.A., & Ball, T.J. (2003). Tribal participatory research: Mechanisms of a collaborative model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 207-216. (Pubitemid 38981439)
20. Foster-Fishman, P.G., & Long, R.L. (2009). The challenges of place, capacity and systems change: The story of yes we can! Foundation Review, 1, 69-84.
21. Frost, M., & Hirsch, A. (2003). The shaping of things to come: Innovation and mission for the 21st century church. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
22. Gamble, J.A.A. (2008). A developmental evaluation primer. Montreal, QC: J.W. McConnell Family Foundation.
23. Grady, E. (2006). How do they fit? Assessing the role of faith-based organizations in social service provision. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 25(3-4), 129-150.
24. Guder, D. (Ed.). (1998). Missional church. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
25. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Harden, M.G. (2006). Towards a faith-based program theory: A reconceptualization of program theory. Evaluation Review, 30(4), 481-504. (Pubitemid 43974326)
27. Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 274-294.
28. Hewitt, J.D., & Regoli, R.M. (2007). The dilemma of evaluating faith-based correctional programs in institutional and community settings. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 35(2), 93-102.
29. Hiemstra, J.L. (2002). Government relations with faith-based non-profit social agencies in Alberta. Journal of Church and State, 44(1), 19-26.
30. Hirsch, A. (2006). The forgotten ways: Reactivating the missional church. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos.
31. Hoang, A. (2001). Canada could take Bush's lead: But researcher says faithbased agencies already have large role in health care and social services. Western Catholic Reporter (February 19, 2001). Retrieved April 7, 2009, from
32. House, E.R. (2004). The role of the evaluator in a political world. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 19(2), 1-16.
33. Hudson, J.M. (2004). When better isn't enough: Evaluation tools for the 21st century church. Herndon, VA: The Alban Institute.
34. Hula, R., Jackson-Elmoore, C., & Reese, L. (2007). Mixing God's work and the public business: A framework for the analysis of faith-based service delivery. Review of Policy Research, 24(1), 67-89. (Pubitemid 46128740)
35. Janzen, R., & Wiebe, D. (2008). Regenerate 21:01: An evaluation framework. Prepared for the Executive Board of the Canadian Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches.
36. Janzen, R., Nelson, G., Hausfather, N., & Ochocka, J. (2007). Capturing system level activities and impacts of consumer-run organizations: Methods that inform future action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(Special issue on systems change), 287-299.
37. Johnson, B.R., Tompkins, R.B., & Webb, D. (2002). Objective hope. Assessing the effectiveness of faith-based organizations: A review of the literature. Philadelphia, PA: Manhattan Institute, Centre for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society.
38. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research. In N.K Denzen & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Kincheloe, J.L., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 303-342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Leake, R., Green, S., Marquez, C., Vanderburg, J., Guillaume, S., & Gardner, V. (2007). Evaluating the capacity of faith-based programs in Colorado. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(2), 216-228.
41. LeCompte, M.D., & Schensul, J.J. (1999). Designing & conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
42. McGrew, C.C., & Cnaan, R.A. (2006). Finding congregations: Developing conceptual clarity in the study of faith-based social services. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 25(3-4), 19-37.
43. McLaughlin, J.A., & Jordan, G.B. (2004). Using logic models. In J.S. Wholey, H.P. Hatry, & K.E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 7-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Meadows, L.M., & Morse, J.M. (2001). Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. In J. Morse, J.M. Swanson, & A.J. Kuzel (Eds.), The nature of qualitative evidence (pp. 184-202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Mertens, D.M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Mertens, D.M. (2008). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford.
47. Mertens, D.M., Holmes, H.M., & Harris, R.L. (2008). Transformative research and ethics. In D.M. Mertens & P.E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 85-102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Minatrea, M. (2004). Shaped by God's heart: The practice and passion of missional churches. San Francisco, CA: Schwartz.
49. Nelson, G.V. (2008). Borderland churches: A congregation's introduction to missional living. St. Louis, MI: Chalice Press.
50. Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Janzen, R., Trainor, J., & Lauzon, S. (2004). A comprehensive evaluation approach for mental health consumer-run organizations: Values, conceptualization, design, and action. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 19(3), 29-53.
51. Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Lord, J., & Griffin, K. (1998). "Nothing about me, without me": Participatory action research with self-help/mutual aid organizations for psychiatric consumer/survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 881-912. (Pubitemid 128696839)
52. Netting, F.E., O'Conner, M.K., & Yancey, G. (2006). Belief systems in faithbased human services programs. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work. 25(3-4), 261-286.
53. O'Connor, M.K., & Netting, F.E. (2008). Faith-based evaluation: Accountable to whom, for what? Evaluation and Program Planning, 31, 347-355.
54. Ochocka, J., & Janzen R. (2008). Blending commitment, passion and structure: Engaging cultural linguistic communities in collaborative research. In A. Williamson & R. DeSouza (Eds.), Researching with communities (pp. 323-338). Waitakere City, NZ: Wairua Press.
55. Patton, M.Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56. Rappaport, J. (2000). Community narratives: Tales of terror and joy. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 1-24.
57. Rush, B., & Ogborne, A. (1991). Program logic models: Expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 6, 95-106.
58. Schensul, J. (2009). Community, culture and sustainability in multilevel dynamic systems intervention science. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(3/4), 241-256.
59. Scriven, M. (1972). Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation. Evaluation Comment: The Journal of Educational Evaluation, 3(4), 1-7.
60. Sider, R.J., Olson, P.N., & Unrah, H.R. (2002). Churches that make a difference: Reaching your community with good news and good works. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
61. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Leviton, L.C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62. Statistics Canada. (2004). Cornerstones of community: Highlights of the national survey of nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Ottawa, ON: Author.
63. A. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 671-701). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Thiessen, B. (Ed.). (2005). Out of the strange silence: The challenge of being Christian in the 21st century. Fresno, CA: Mennonite Brethren Biblical Seminary.
65. Thyer, B.A. (2006). Faith-based programs and the role of empirical research. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 25(3-4), 63-82.
66. Thyer, B.A. (2007). A note from the editor. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(2), 169-170.
67. Unruh, H.R., & Sider, R.J. (2005). Saving souls, serving society: Understanding the faith factor in church-based social ministry. Oxford University Press.
68. Van Gelder, C. (2007). The ministry of the missional church: A community led by the Spirit. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
69. Walton, E. (2007). Evaluation faith-based programs: An introduction from the guest editor. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(2), 171-173.
70. Weiss, C. (1983). The stakeholder approach to evaluation: Origins and promise. In A.S. Bryk (Ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation, 17 (pp. 3-14). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
71. Whittemore, R., Chase, S.K., & Mandle, C.L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 522.