Sensitivity of controlled-source electromagnetic fields in planarly layered media

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 187, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 705-728

  Streich, R ^a,b   Becken, M ^c  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic theory

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC EXPRESSIONS; APPLICATION EXAMPLES; BUILDING BLOCKES; CONTROLLED SOURCE; ELECTRIC SOURCES; ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORIES; EM FIELD; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FIELD SENSITIVITY; INVERSION SCHEME; LAYERED MEDIA; MAGNETIC DIPOLE; NUMERICAL EVALUATIONS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; PLANARLY LAYERED MEDIA; SENSITIVITY EXPRESSIONS;

ANISOTROPIC MEDIA; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROMAGNETISM;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY;

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY;

EID: 80054690487     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05203.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. nd EAGE Conference, Barcelona, Extended Abstract.
2. Anderson, W.L., 1982. Fast Hankel transforms using related and lagged convolutions, ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 8(4), 344-368.
3. Andréis, D. & MacGregor, L., 2008. Controlled-source electromagnetic sounding in shallow water: principles and applications, Geophysics, 73(1), F21-F32.
4. Chave, A.D., 1983. Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms by quadrature and continued fraction expansion, Geophysics, 48(12), 1671-1686.
5. Chave, A.D., 1984. The fréchet derivatives of electromagnetic induction, J. geophys. Res., 89(B5), 3373-3380.
6. Chave, A.D., 2009. On the electromagnetic fields produced by marine frequency domain controlled sources, Geophys. J. Int., 179, 1429-1457.
7. Chave, A.D. & Cox, C.S., 1982. Controlled electromagnetic sources for measuring electrical conductivity beneath the oceans, 1. forward problem and model study, J. geophys. Res., 87(B7), 5327-5338.
8. Christensen, N.B., 1990. Optimized fast Hankel transform filters, Geophys. Prospect., 38, 545-568.
9. Commer, M. & Newman, G.A., 2008. New advances in three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 172, 513-535.
10. Constable, S. & Weiss, C.J., 2006. Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods: insights from 1D modeling, Geophysics, 71(2), G43-G51.
11. Constable, S.C., Parker, R.L. & Constable, C.G., 1987. Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data, Geophysics, 75(3), 289-300.
12. Eidesmo, T., Ellingsrud, S., MacGregor, L. M., Constable, S., Sinha, M. C., Johansen, S., Kong, F. N. & Westerdahl, H., 2002. Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas, First Break, 20(3), 144-152.
13. Everett, M.E. & Constable, S., 1999. Electric dipole fields over an anisotropic sea£oor: theory and application to the structure of 40 Ma Pacific Ocean lithosphere, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 41-56.
14. Farquharson, C.G. & Oldenburg, D.W., 1996. Approximate sensitivities for the electromagnetic inverse problem, Geophys. J. Int., 126, 235-252.
15. Ferguson, I.J. & Edwards, R.N., 1994. Electromagnetic mode conversion by surface-conductivity anomalies: applications for conductivity soundings, Geophys. J. Int., 117, 48-68.
16. Flosadóttir, A.H. & Constable, S., 1996. Marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding - 1. Modeling and experimental design, J. geophys. Res., 101(B3), 5507-5517.
17. Friedrichs, B., 2010. Product Memo: MFS-06e Broad Band Induction Coil Magnetometer, Metronix Messgeraete und Elektronik GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany .
18. 2SINK site: a concept integrating geophysics, geochemistry and microbiology, Energy Procedia, 1(1), 2251-2259.
19. Haber, E., Oldenburg, D.W. & Shekhtman, R., 2007. Inversion of time domain three-dimensional electromagnetic data, Geophys. J. Int., 171, 550-564.
20. Johansen, H.K. & Sørensen, K., 1979. Fast Hankel transforms, Geophys. Prospect., 27, 876-901.
21. Key, K., 2009. 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers, Geophysics, 74(2), F9-F20.
22. Løseth, L.O., 2011. Insight into the marine controlled-source electromagnetic signal propagation, Geophys. Prospect., 59, 145-160.
23. Løseth, L.O. & Ursin, B., 2007. Electromagnetic fields in planarly layered anisotropic media, Geophys. J. Int., 170, 44-80.
24. Newman, G.A. & Alumbaugh, D.L., 1997. Three-dimensional massively parallel electromagnetic inversion - I. Theory, Geophys. J. Int., 128, 345-354.
25. Newman, G.A. & Boggs, P.T., 2004. Solution accelerators for large-scale three-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems, Inverse Prob., 20, S151-S170.
26. Newman, G.A., Commer, M. & Carazzone, J.J., 2010. Imaging CSEM data in the presence of electrical anisotropy, Geophysics, 75(2), F51-F61.
27. Orange, A., Key, K. & Constable, S., 2009. The feasibility of reservoir monitoring using time-lapse marine CSEM, Geophysics, 74(2), F21-F29.
28. Piessens, R., de Doncker-Kapenga, E., Überhuber, C.W. & Kahaner, D., 1983. QUADPACK: A Subroutine Package for Automatic Integration, Springer, Berlin.
29. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77, 2nd edn, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
30. Ridders, C.J.F., 1982. Accurate computation of f'(x) and f'(x) f"(x), Adv. Eng. Softw., 4(2), 75-76.
31. Streich, R. & Becken, M., 2011. Electromagnetic fields generated by finite-length wire sources: comparison with point dipole solutions, Geophys. Prospect., 59, 361-374.
32. 2 storage sites, geothermal reservoirs, and gas shales using controlled-source magnetotellurics: modeling studies, Chemie der Erde (Geochemistry), 70(S3), 63-75.
33. Um, E.S. & Alumbaugh, D.L., 2007. On the physics of the marine controlled-source electromagnetic method, Geophysics, 72(2), WA13-WA26.
34. Ward, S.H. & Hohmann, G.W., 1987. Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications, in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, pp. 131-311, ed. Nabighian, M.N., Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
35. Weidelt, P., 2007. Guided waves in marine CSEM, Geophys. J. Int., 171, 153-176.
36. Wirianto, M., Mulder, W.A. & Slob, E.C., 2010. A feasibility study of land CSEM reservoir monitoring in a complex 3-D model, Geophys. J. Int., 181, 741-755.
37. Zhdanov, M.S., 2009. New advances in regularized inversion of gravity and electromagnetic data, Geophys. Prospect., 57, 463-478.
38. Ziolkowski, A., Parr, R., Wright, D., Nockles, V., Limond, C., Morris, E. & Linfoot, J., 2010. Multi-transient electromagnetic repeatability experiment over the North Sea Harding field, Geophys. Prospect., 58, 1159-1176.