Objects can be localized at positions that are inconsistent with the relative disparity between them

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 1-6

  Sousa, Rita ^a   Brenner, Eli ^a   Smeets, Jeroen B J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Depth; Spatial vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 80054120595     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.2.1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blank, A. A. (1958). Analysis of experiments in binocular space perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 48, 911-925.
2. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2000). Comparing extraretinal information about distance and direction. Vision Research, 40, 1649-1651.
3. Brenner, E., & Van Damme, W. (1999). Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Research, 39, 975-986.
4. Collet, T. S., Schwarz, U., & Sobel, E. C. (1991). The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception, 20, 733-754.
5. Epstein, W. (1963). Attitudes of judgment and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 78-83.
6. Foley, J. M. (1977). Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance. Perception, 6, 449-460.
7. Foley, J. M. (1980). Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87, 411-434.
8. Foley, J. M. (1985). Binocular distance perception: Egocentric distance tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 133-149.
9. Gogel, W. (1961). Convergence as a cue to the perceived distance of objects in a binocular configuration. The Journal of Psychology, 52, 303-315.
10. Gogel, W. (1972). Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance. American Journal of Psychology, 85, 477-497.
11. Johnston, E. (1991). Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research, 31, 1351-1360.
12. Poulton, E. (1981). Human manual control. In V. B. Brooks (Ed.), Handbook of physiology (pp. 1337-1389). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Association.
13. Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2008). Why we don't mind to be inconsistent. In P. Calvo & T. Gomila (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive science-An embodied approach (pp. 207-217). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
14. Sousa, R., Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2010). A new binocular cue for absolute distance: Disparity relative to the most distant structure. Vision Research, 50, 1786-1792.
15. Tresilian, J. R., Mon-Williams, M., & Kelly, B. M. (1999). Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 266, 39-44.