Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 847-855

  Koch, Martin C ^a   Adamietz, Boris ^a   Jud, Sebastian M ^a   Fasching, Peter A ^a,b   Haeberle, Lothar ^a   Karbacher, Stefan ^c   Veit, Klaus ^c   Schulz Wendtland, Ruediger ^a   Uder, Michael ^a   Beckmann, Matthias W ^a   Bani, Mayada R ^a   Heusinger, Katharina ^a   Loehberg, Christian R ^a   Cavallaro, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c 3D Shape GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast volume; Comparison; MRI; Surface assessment; Three dimensional (3D); Volumetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BODY SURFACE; BREAST; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGAN SIZE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY SURFACE AREA; BREAST; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGAN SIZE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054109884     PISSN: 0364216X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-011-9708-x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. M Eder NA Papadopulos L Kovacs 2007 Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy Plast Reconstr Surg 120 356 357 17572598 10.1097/01.prs.0000264573. 18260.34 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmvFahs7k%3D (Pubitemid 46956085)
2. GM Galdino, et al. 2002 Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery Plast Reconstr Surg 110 58 70 12087232 10.1097/00006534-200207000-00012 (Pubitemid 34686249)
3. C Herold, et al. 2010 MRI-based breast volumetry evaluation of three different software solutions J Digit Imaging 23 603 610 20066465 10.1007/s10278-009-9264-y
4. MY Nahabedian G Galdino 2003 Symmetrical breast reconstruction: Is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg 112 1582 1590 14578788 10.1097/01.PRS.0000076640.78611.C7 (Pubitemid 38251798)
5. O Pawluczyk, et al. 2003 A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms Med Phys 30 352 364 12674236 10.1118/1.1539038 (Pubitemid 36337102)
6. N Boyd, et al. 2009 Breast tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study Lancet Oncol 10 569 580 19409844 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70078-6
7. A Hasenburg, et al. 2000 Breast size as risk factor for tumor size at diagnosis Anticancer Res 20 2041 2044 10928148 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgtVWqtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30636179)
8. H Jernstrom, et al. 2005 Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) genotype predicts breast volume after pregnancy and hormonal contraception and is associated with circulating IGF-1 levels: implications for risk of early-onset breast cancer in young women from hereditary breast cancer families Br J Cancer 92 857 866 15756256 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602389 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7isVKgtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40462630)
9. JG Ray, et al. 2008 Breast size and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus CMAJ 178 289 295 18227448 (Pubitemid 351212874)
10. B Rinker M Veneracion CP Walsh 2008 The effect of breastfeeding on breast aesthetics Aesthet Surg J 28 534 537 19083576 10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.004
11. N Bulstrode E Bellamy S Shrotria 2001 Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques Breast 10 117 123 14965570 10.1054/brst.2000.0196 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2Fns1erug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32390225)
12. L Kovacs, et al. 2007 Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques Breast 16 137 145 17029808 10.1016/j.breast.2006.08.001 (Pubitemid 46488807)
13. FL Bookstein 1997 Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape Med Image Anal 1 225 243 9873908 10.1016/S1361-8415(97)85012-8 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FptVGqtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 127502900)
14. BN Campaigne, et al. 1979 Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method Ann Hum Biol 6 363 367 533239 10.1080/03014467900003741 1:STN:280:DyaL3c7ivVyhsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 10216736)
15. MK Caruso, et al. 2006 The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume Aesthetic Plast Surg 30 16 20 16411159 10.1007/s00266-004- 0105-6 (Pubitemid 43207266)
16. M Eder, et al. 2008 Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging Biomed Tech Berl 53 112 121 18601619 10.1515/BMT.2008.017 (Pubitemid 351836054)
17. A Edsander-Nord M Wickman G Jurell 1996 Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 30 129 132 8815982 10.3109/02844319609056394 1:STN:280:DyaK28vht1KgsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26179201)
18. PA Fowler, et al. 1990 Cyclic changes in composition and volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle, measured by magnetic resonance imaging Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97 595 602 2390502 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02546.x 1:STN:280:DyaK3czlvFyktQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 20220764)
19. CL Kalbhen, et al. 1999 Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 1643 1649 10584814 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkvFGjuw%3D%3D
20. L Kovacs, et al. 2006 New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging Ann Plast Surg 57 602 610 17122543 10.1097/01.sap.0000235455.21775.6a 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnsFY%3D (Pubitemid 44808806)
21. S Malini EO Smith JW Goldzieher 1985 Measurement of breast volume by ultrasound during normal menstrual cycles and with oral contraceptive use Obstet Gynecol 66 538 541 3900840 1:STN:280:DyaL28%2FhsFentg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 16236442)
22. WE Palin Jr JA von Fraunhofer DJ Smith Jr 1986 Measurement of breast volume: comparison of techniques Plast Reconstr Surg 77 253 255 3945688 10.1097/00006534-198602000-00013
23. SP Sinha, et al. 2007 Multimodality 3D breast imaging with X-ray tomosynthesis and automated ultrasound Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007 1335 1338 18002210
24. DJ Smith Jr, et al. 1986 Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values Plast Reconstr Surg 78 331 335 3737757 10.1097/00006534-198609000- 00008 (Pubitemid 16049561)
25. OM Tepper, et al. 2008 Three-dimensional imaging provides valuable clinical data to aid in unilateral tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction Breast J 14 543 550 19054001 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00645.x
26. JG Thomson, et al. 2009 Surface area measurement of the female breast: phase I. Validation of a novel optical technique Plast Reconstr Surg 123 1588 1596 19407633 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a076ad 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXlt1Clu70%3D
27. S van Engeland, et al. 2006 Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25 273 282 16524084 10.1109/TMI.2005.862741 (Pubitemid 43320644)
28. M Westreich 1997 Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application Plast Reconstr Surg 100 468 479 9252618 10.1097/00006534-199708000-00032 1:STN:280:DyaK2szps1ChtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27458785)
29. CW Loughry, et al. 1989 Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis Ann Plast Surg 22 380 385 2729845 10.1097/00000637- 198905000-00002 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3ntFGhtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19130310)
30. DB Sheffer, et al. 1986 Validity and reliability of biostereometric measurement of the human female breast Ann Biomed Eng 14 1 14 3706852 10.1007/BF02364645 1:STN:280:DyaL283htleitg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 16112850)
31. E Thurfjell, et al. 1996 Breast size and mammographic pattern in relation to breast cancer risk Eur J Cancer Prev 5 37 41 8664807 10.1097/00008469- 199612002-00006 1:STN:280:DyaK283htlelsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27085337)
32. RC Schultz RF Dolezal J Nolan 1986 Further applications of Archimedes' principle in the correction of asymmetrical breasts Ann Plast Surg 16 98 101 3273032 10.1097/00000637-198602000-00003 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7ps12ntA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 16171534)
33. VL Katch, et al. 1980 Contribution of breast volume and weight to body fat distribution in females Am J Phys Anthropol 53 93 100 7416252 10.1002/ajpa.1330530113 1:STN:280:DyaL3M%2FhvFamug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 11149940)
34. A Losken, et al. 2005 Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast Ann Plast Surg 54 471 476 15838205 10.1097/01.sap.0000155278.87790.a1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtlGrsbbI discussion 477-478 (Pubitemid 40571551)
35. HY Lee K Hong EA Kim 2004 Measurement protocol of women's nude breasts using a 3D scanning technique Appl Ergon 35 353 359 15159200 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.03.004 (Pubitemid 38680833)
36. OM Tepper, et al. 2006 Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery Am J Surg 192 548 551 16978973 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.026 (Pubitemid 44344184)
37. Karbacher S, Häusler G, Schönfeld H (1999) Reverse engineering using optical range sensors in handbook of computer vision and applications, vol 3. Academic Press, Boston
38. Karbacher S, Seeger S, Häusler G (2001) Refining triangle meshes by nonlinear subdivision. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on 3-D digital imaging and modeling. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 270-277
39. LI Lin 1989 A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility Biometrics 45 255 268 2720055 10.2307/2532051 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3kslKrtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19109172)
40. JM Bland DG Altman 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 327 307 310 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 (Pubitemid 16134762)