Building Blocks for a Precautionary Approach to the Use of Nanomaterials: Positions Taken by Trade Unions and Environmental NGOs in the European Nanotechnologies Debate

Risk Analysis

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1646-1657

  Van Broekhuizen, Pieter ^a   Reijnders, Lucas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Engineered nanomaterials; Environmental NGOs; Nano reference values; Nanotechnologies debate; Occupational exposure limits; Precautionary approach; Public debate; Trade unions

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERED NANOMATERIALS; ENVIRONMENTAL NGOS; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS; PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH; PUBLIC DEBATE; REFERENCE VALUES; TRADE UNIONS;

COMMERCE; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; RISK MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

CAPACITY BUILDING; ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; MANUFACTURING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TRADE UNION; WORKPLACE;

EUROPE;

EID: 80054108794     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01615.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Besenbacher F, Lauritsen JV, Wendt S. STM studies of model catalysts. NanoToday, 2007; 2(4):30-39.
2. NNI, National Nanotechnology Inititative. Available at:, Accessed November 2009.
3. Woodrow Wilson Institute. PEN Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Available at:, Accessed November 2009.
4. Kahru A, Dubourguier HC. From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology. Toxicology, 2010; 269:105-119. doi:.
5. Renwich LC, Brown D, Clouter A, Donaldson A. Increased inflammation and altered macrophage chemotactic responses caused by two ultrafine particles types. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2004; 61(5):442-447.
6. Schneider T. Evaluation and control of occupational health risks from nanoparticles. TemaNord Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen 2007:581., Accessed January 2010.
7. Schulte P, Geraci C, Zumwalde R, Hoover M, Kuempel E. Occupational risk management of engineered nanoparticles. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2008; 5: 239-249.
8. Borm PJA, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, Donaldson K, Schins R, Stone V, Kreyling W, Lademann J, Krutmann J, Warheit D Oberdorster E. The potential risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for ECETOC. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 2006; 3: 239-249.
9. Trouiller B, Reliene R, Westbrook A, Solaimani P Schiestl RH. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce DNA damage and genetic instability in vivo in mice. Cancer Research, 2009; 69:8784-8789.
10. Knol AB, de Hartog JJ, Boogaard H, Slottje P, Van Der Sluijs J, Lebret E, Cassee FR, Wardekker JA, Ayres JG, Borm PJ, Brunekreef B, Donaldson K, Forastiere F, Holgate ST, Kreyling WG, Nemery B, Pekkanen J, Stone V, Wichmann HE Hoek E. Expert elicitation on ultrafine particles: Likelihood of health effects and causal pathways. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 2009; 6:19, doi:.
11. Stone V, Hankin S, Aitken R, Aschberger K, Baun A, Christensen F, Fernandes T, Hansen SF, Hartmann NB, Hutchinson G. Engineered Nanoparticles: Review of Health and Environmental Safety (ENRHES); Project Final Report; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
12. Reijnders L. Hazard reduction for the application of titania nanoparticles in environmental technology. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2008; 152(1):440-445, available at.
13. Reijnders L. Hazard reduction in nanotechnology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008; 12(3): 297-306.
14. Grieger KD, Hansen SF, Baun A. The known unknowns of nanomaterials: Describing and characterizing uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks. Nanotoxicology, 2009; 3(3):222-233.
15. VCI. Guidance for the passing on of information along the supply chain in the handling of nanomaterials via safety data sheets, Verband der Chemischen Industrie e.V. 6 March 2008., Accessed May 2010.
16. BAUA. Guidance for handling and use of nanomaterials at the workplace. Bundersanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedicin (Verband der Chemischen Industrie e.V. 2007., Accessed May 2010.
17. BASF., Accessed November 2009.
18. Bayer. Code of good practice on the production and on-site-use of nanomaterials. 2007., Accessed November 2009.
19. RNC. Insight Investment: Royal Society, Centre for Process Innovation; Nanotechnology Industries Association. ResponsibleNanoCode. 2008 May., Accessed October 2009.
20. IG DHS. Interessengemeinschaft Detailhandel Schweiz. Code of conduct for nanotechnologies. Information on the Swiss retail trade's code of conduct. 2008 Apr., Accessed October 2009.
21. ED/DuPont. NANO Risk Framework, Environmental Defense. DuPont Nano Partnership 2007 June., Accessed October 2009.
22. REACH. Regulation No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006, concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemical Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/155/EEC and 2000/21/EC. 2006.
23. CAD. Chemical Agents Directive 98/24/EC; Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 (as supplemented by Directives 2000/39/EC and 2006/15/EC) on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). 1998.
24. REACH-RIP-oN1. REACH Implementation project on substance identification of nano-materials (RIP-oN1). 2010.
25. EC 2000. Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle, COM(2000) 1;, Accessed March 13, 2011.
26. EC 2008-2. Commission of the European Communities, Commission Recommendation on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research, C(2008) 424 final., Accessed March 13, 2011.
27. Arnall AA. Greenpeace Environmental Trust. Future technologies, today's choices nanotechnology, artificial intelligence and robotics; A technical, political and institutional map of emerging technologies. 2003;, Accessed May 2009.
28. ETC Group. The Big Down: Atomtech-Technologies Converging at the Nano-Scale, Ottawa, Canada. 2003;, Accessed May 2009.
29. ETC Group. Down on the Farm, The Impact of Nano-Scale Technologies on Food and Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada. 2004;, Accessed May 2009.
30. FoEA. Friends of the Earth Australia. Nanotechnology Policy Statement, 2007 May., Accessed March 13, 2011.
31. Horn H, Kühling W. BUND. BUND Position For the responsible management of Nanotechnology-Resolution by the National Executive Committee. 2007 Apr., Accessed May 2009.
32. FNE.France Nature Environnement [French Federation of NGOs Protecting Nature & Environment]. Position paper on nanotechnologies issues. 2007 Feb., Accessed March 13, 2011.
33. Soil Association, Press release. Soil Association first organisation in the world to ban nanoparticles: Potentially toxic beauty products that get right under your skin. Annual Review 2008 Jan., Accessed March 13, 2011.
34. Helland A, Kastenholz H, Thidell A, Arnfalk P Deppert K. Nanoparticulate materials and regulatory policy in Europe: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2006; 8: 709-719.
35. Hansen SF. Multicriteria mapping of stakeholder preferences in regulating nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2010; 12:1959-1970. doi:10.1007(s1 1051-010-0006-3.
36. EC. Communication from the Commission of the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials, SEC/2008) 2036. 2008-3., Accessed November 2009.
37. NL Ministerie van Economische Zaken. Actieplan Nanotechnologie. 2008 June., Accessed March 13, 2011.
38. EC. Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on cosmetic products (recast) (text with EEA relevance), (SEC(2008)117) (SEC(2008)118). 2008-4.
39. Kearnes M, MacNaughten P, Wilsdon J. UK. Governing at the Nanoscale: People, Policies and Emerging Technologies. London Demos, 2006.
40. Stilgoe J. UK. Nanodialogues: Experiments in Public Engagement with Science. London Demos, 2007.
41. Which? Report on the Citizens' Panel examining nanotechnologies, prepared by Opinion Leader.. 2007, Accessed March 13, 2011.
42. Bowman DM, Hodge GA. Nanotechnology and public interest dialogue: Some international observations. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 2007; 27(2):118-132.
43. BE. viWTA Dossier Special. NanoNu, Klein met en grote toekomst. 2007. Available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
44. FR. La France lance son grand Débat Nano. 2007, Accessed March 13, 2011.
45. Bundesministyerium fur Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Berichte und Empfehlungen aus der ersten NanoDialog-Phase 2006-2008. Availabe at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
46. EC 2008-1. European Commission 2008, Commission starts public dialogue on nanotechnologies-Tapping economic and environmental potential through safe products. IP/08/947. Brussels. 2008 June., Accessed March 13, 2011.
47. NL 2009. Dutch Minister of Economical Affairs. Instellingsbesluit Commissie maatschappelijke dialoog nanotechnologie. Staatscourant 2009 Mar;61.
48. Rip A. The Tension Between Fiction and Precaution in Nanotechnology. Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Perspectives and Prospects. Fisher E, Jones J, von Schomberg R (eds). Cheltenham, UK Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2006.
49. Randles S. From nano-ethicswash to real-time regulation. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2009; 12(3): 270-274.
50. NanoCap 2009. Nanotechnology Capacity Building NGOs. 2009, Accessed March 13, 2011.
51. ETUC 2008. Resolution on Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials. Available at 2008; ETUC 2nd resolution on Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials, 2010, available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
52. FNV 2008. Letter to the Minster of Social Affairs, Occupational health risks nanoparticles, 28 October 2008. 2008, Accessed March 13, 2011.
53. Amicus 2009. Nanotechnology: A Short Introduction, Frank Barry UNITE the Union. Available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
54. EEB 2009. EEB position paper on nanotechnologies and nanomaterials. Small scale, big promises, divisive messages. February 2009. Available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
55. Legambiente 2009. Towards a sustainable and responsible development of nanotechnologies. Available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
56. BEF 2009. Baltic Environmental Forum, Position Paper on Nanotechnologies by Coalition of Lithuanian Environmental Non-Governmental Organisations. Available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
57. MIO-ESCDE 2009. MIO-ESCDE Position Paper on Nanotechnologies. Available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
58. Rientjes S. Natuur en Milieu. Actieplan Nanotechnologie, Letter to the Vaste Commissie voor Economische Zaken uit de Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal. November 2008. Available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
59. Dutch Working Conditions Decree (a), sections 4.11 to 4.15 (registration of carcinogenic and mutagenic substances).
60. Dutch Working Conditions Decree (b), section 4.2a (supplementary registration for reproduction-toxic substances).
61. Berger M. Debunking the Trillion Dollar Nanotechnology Market Size Hype. Nanowerk. 2007, Accessed March 13, 2011.
62. Lux Research Inc. Nanomaterials State of the Market Q3 2008: Stealth Success, Broad Impact. 2008., Accessed March 13, 2011.
63. Cientifica. Nanotechnology Takes a Deep Breath and Prepares to Save the World! Global Nanotechnology Funding in 2009. Cientifica Ltd. Available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
64. Ebeling M. Mediating uncertainty: Communicating the financial risks of nanotechnologies. Science Communication, 2008; 29(3):335-361.
65. Schlyter C; European Parliament, Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Report on regulatory aspects of nanomaterials (2008/2208/INI)). 2009 Apr..
66. Grenelle 2009. Predispositions in Favour of Environment and Health. Le Grenelle Environnement. Chapter 1, Section 37. 2009. Cited in Social Economic Council Netherlands. Nanoparticles in the Workplace: Health and Safety Precautions. Advisory report 0901. The Hague. 2009 Mar:42.
67. Social Economic Council Netherlands. Nanoparticles in the Workplace: Health and Safety Precautions. Advisory report 0901, 2009. The Hague Available at, Accessed March 13, 2011.
68. Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal. Vergaderjaar 2008-2009. 29338 nr 85. Wetenschapsbudget 2004. Motie van de leden Besselink, Gesthuizen Voorgesteld 2 Juli 2009.
69. Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal. Vergaderjaar 2008-2009. 29338 nr 85. Wetenschapsbudget 2004. Gewijzigde motie van de leden Gesthuizen Besselink, Ter vervanging van die gedrukt onder nr. 81. 2 Juli 2009.
70. NIOSH 2005. Draft NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin: Evaluation of Health Hazard and Recommendations for Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide. 2005 Nov 22..
71. Auffan M, Rose J, Bottero JY, Lowry GV, Jolivet JP Wiesner MR. Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nature Nanotechnology, 2009. doi.
72. BSI 2007. BSI-British Standards. Guide to Safe Handling and Disposal of Manufactured Nanomaterials. Nanotechnologies: Part 2. PD 6699-2:2007. BSI 2007., Accessed March 13, 2011.
73. Chunfang F, Chen J, Chen Y, Ji J, Teng HH. Relationship between solubility and solubility product: The roles of crystal sizes and crystallographic directions. Geochimica and Cosmochemica Act, 2006; 70(15): 3820-3829.
74. IFA 2009. Maßstäbe zur Beurteilung der Wirksamkeit von Schutzmaßnahmen, 2010. Available at Accessed March 13, 2011.
75. Dekkers S, de Heer, H. Tijdelijke nano-referentiewaarden. Bruikbaarheid van het concept en van de gepubliceerde methode. RIVM Rapport 601044001;2010. 2010, Accessed March 13, 2011.