Multicriteria mapping of stakeholder preferences in regulating nanotechnology

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1959-1970

  Hansen, Steffen Foss ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Multicriteria mapping; Nanotechnology; Regulatory options; Societal dimensions; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

HEALTH ISSUES; INCREMENTAL APPROACH; MULTI-CRITERIA; MULTICRITERIA MAPPING; NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS; OPEN-SOURCE PROGRAM; QUALITATIVE APPROACH;

MAPPING; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

ANALYTIC METHOD; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ETHICS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA MAPPING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 77955013958     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-010-0006-3     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Davies JC (2006) Managing the effects of nanotechnology. Project on emerging nanotechnologies. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC
2. U.S. EPA (2007) Nanoscale materials stewardship program and inventory status of nanoscale substances under the toxic substances control act; notice of availability. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/2007/July/Day-12/t13558.htm. Accessed 02 Jun 2009
3. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General (2004) Nanotechnologies: a preliminary risk analysis on the basis of a workshop. European Commission, Brussels
4. FOE (2006) Nanomaterials, sunscreens and cosmetics: small ingredients, big risks. Friends of the Earth Report (FoE), May 2006 (co-written by FoE Australia and US). http://nano.foe.org.au/filestore2/download/99/ Nano%20cosmetics%20report%20-%20web.pdf. Accessed 21 Sep 2009
5. Greenwood M (2007) Thinking big about things small: creating an effective oversight system for nanotechnology. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC
6. IRGC (2006) White paper on nanotechnology risk governance. International Risk Governance Council, Geneva
7. J Kuzma J Paradise G Ramachandran J-A Kim G Kokotovich SM Wolf 2008 An integrated approach to oversight assessment for emerging technologies Risk Anal 28 5 1197 1219 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01086.x 18631303
8. I Linkov FK Satterstrom G Kiker TP Seager T Bridges KH Gardner SH Rogers DA Belluck A Meyer 2006 Multicriteria decision analysis: a comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments Risk Anal 26 1 61 78 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00713.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD287gs12mug%3D%3D 16492181
9. I Linkov FK Satterstrom J Steevens E Ferguson RC Pleus 2007 Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials J Nanopart Res 9 543 554 10.1007/s11051-007-9211-0 (Pubitemid 46800846)
10. S Mayer A Stirling 2004 GM crops, for good or bad? Those who choose the questions, determine the answers EMBO Rep 5 11 1021 1024 10.1038/sj.embor. 7400285 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXptFems7Y%3D 15520800 (Pubitemid 39600196)
11. A Maynard D Rejeski 2009 Too small to overlook Nat Nanotech 460 174 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXotlSgt70%3D
12. E Millstone T Lobstein 2007 The PorGrow project: overall cross-national results, comparisons and implications Obes Rev 8 Suppl. 2 29 36 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00356.x 17371305 (Pubitemid 46435070)
13. National Pollution Prevention and Toxics Advisory Committee (2005) Overview document on nanoscale materials. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
14. NIOSH (2009) Approaches to safe nanotechnology managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
15. M Powell 2007 New risk or old risk? How scientists' standpoints shape their nanotechnology risk frames Health Risk Soc 9 2 173 190 10.1080/13698570701306872 (Pubitemid 46993394)
16. Stirling A (2005a) Multi-criteria mapping: a detailed interview manual. Version 4.4. May 2005. SPRU: University of Sussex
17. Stirling A (2005b) Multi-criteria mapping: a detailed analysis manual. Manual Version 2.2 2nd December 2005. SPRU: University of Sussex
18. T Tervonen J Figueira J Steevens J Kim I Linkov 2009 Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials J Nanopart Res 11 757 766 10.1007/s11051-008-9546-1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXktVGku7g%3D