Towards an integrated approach for the analysis of gender equity in policies supporting paid work and care responsibilities

Demographic Research

Volumn 25, Issue , 2011, Pages 371-406

  Saraceno, Chiara ^a   Keck, Wolfgang ^a  

^a WZB BERLIN SOCIAL SCIENCE CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054083842     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14359871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.11     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aisenbrey, S., Evertsson, M., and Grunow, D. (2009). Is there a career penalty for mother's time out? A comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States. Social Forces 88(2): 573-606.
2. Aliaga, C. (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe? Statistics in Focus 4: 1-11.
3. Anderson, K.M., and Meyer, T. (2006). New social risks and pension reforms in Germany and Sweden. The politics of pension rights for childcare. In: Armingeon, K. and Bonoli, G. (eds.). The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge: 171-191.
4. Arber, S. and Ginn, J. (1995). Gender differences in the relationship between paid employment and informal care. Work Employment and Society 9(3): 445-471.
5. Bäckman, O. and Ferrarini, T. (2010). Combating child poverty? A multilevel assessment of family policy institutions and child poverty in 21 old and new welfare states. Journal of Social Policy 39(2): 275-296.
6. Bettio, F., Simonazzi, A., and Villa, P. (2006). Change in care regimes and female migration: The "Care Drain" in the mediterranean. Journal of European Social Policy 16(3): 271-285.
7. Bielenksi, H., Bosch, G., and Wagner, A. (2002). Working time preferences in sixteen European countries. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
8. Bird, K. (2003). Reconciling work and the family. The impact of parental leave policies and occupation on the female life course. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.
9. Blome, A., Keck, W., and Alber, J. (2009). Family and the welfare state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10. Bonoli, G. (2007). Time matters. Post industrialization, new social risks and welfare state adaptation in advanced industrial democracies. Comparative Political Studies 40(5): 495-520.
11. Cooke, L.P. (2011). Gender-class equality in political economies. New York: Routledge.
12. Council of Europe (2011). Council of Europe Family Policy Database. Current leave arrangements/time off for people caring for elderly/disabled or other adult dependent persons. http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/familypolicy/Source/3_3_5%20 Leave%20to%20care%20for%20adult%20depandants.pdf (access date: April 26, 2011).
13. Crompton, R. and Lyonette, C. (2007). Occupational class, country and the domestic division of labour. In: Crompton, R., Lewis, S., and Lyonette, C. (eds.). Women, men, work and family in Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan: 116-132.
14. Daatland, S.O. and Herlofson, K. (2004). Families, welfare states, and ageing. Family solidarity in a European perspective. Oslo: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring (NOVA-rapport 7-2004).
15. Den Dulk, L. (1999). Employers and parental leave: A comparative analysis. In: Moss, P. and Deven, F. (eds.). Parental leave. Progress or pitfall? The Hague, Brussels: NIDI/CBGS Publications: 227-247.
16. Den Dulk, L. (2001). Work-family arrangements in organisations: A cross-national study in the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom and Sweden. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.
17. Dingeldey, I. (2001). European tax systems and their impact on family employment patterns. Journal of Social Policy 30(4): 653-672.
18. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundation of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women's new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. EU-SILC (2006). European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions: Survey 2006. Luxembourg, Statistical Office of the European Union (eurostat).
22. European Commission (2004). Development of a methodology for the collection of harmonised statistics on childcare. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
23. European Commission (2009). Report on equality between women and men. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
24. European Union (2010). Social protection systems in Member States - MISSOC [electronic source]. Brusses: European Union. http://www.nondiscrimination-eu.info/MISSOC2010/home.jsp.
25. Franco, D. (2002). Italy: A never-ending pension reform. In: Feldstein, M. and Siebert, H. (eds.). Social security pension reform in Europe. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press: 211-262.
26. Frericks, P., Maier, R., and De Graaf, W. (2007). Male norms and female rectifications: The influence of care credits on gender pension gaps in France and Germany. In: Frericks, P. (ed.). Setting rights. Resource flows, life-course norms and the dynamics of citizenship in European pension systems. Utrecht: University of Utrecht: 101-135.
27. Gershuny, J. and Sullivan, O. (2003). Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics 10(2): 205-228.
28. Gerson, K. (2009). The Unfinished Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Ginn, J. and Arber, S. (1999). Changing patterns of pension inequality: From public to private sources. Ageing & Society 19(3): 319-342.
30. Ginn, J., Street, D., and Arber, S. (eds.) (2001). Women, work and pensions. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
31. Gornick, J.C. and Meyers, M.K. (2009). Institutions that support gender equality in parenthood and employment. In: Gornick, J.C. and Meyers, M.K. (eds.). Gender equality. London: Verso: 3-66.
32. Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. (2008). Pflege der Eltern - Ein europäischer Vergleich. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 60(1): 78-101.
33. Hobson, B. (1994). Solo mothers, policy regimes and the logics of gender. In: Sainsbury, D. (ed.). Gendering welfare state. London: Sage: 170-187.
34. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. London: Piatkus.
35. Holzmann, R., MacKellar, L., and Rutkowski, M. (2003). Accelerating the European pension reform agenda: Need, progress, and conceptual Underpinnings. In: Holzmann, R., Orenstein, M., and Rutkowski, M. (eds.). Pension reform in Europe: Process and progress. Washington: The World Bank: 1-46.
36. Johansson, L., Sundström, G., and Hassing, L.B. (2003). State provision down, offspring's up: The reversed substitution of old-age care in Sweden. Ageing & Society 23(2): 269-280.
37. Keck, W., Hessel, P., and Saraceno, C. (2009). Multilinks Database on Intergenerational Policy Indicators Methodological Report. Berlin: Social Science Research Center (WZB).
38. Knijn, T. and Kremer, M. (1997). Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: Toward inclusive citizenship. Social Politics 4(3): 328-361.
39. Knijn, T. and Ostner, I. (2008). The meaning of children in Dutch and German family policy. In: Leira, A. and Saraceno, C. (eds). Childhood: Changing contexts. Bingley: Emerald: 81-114.
40. Kramer, B.J. and Kipnis, S. (1995). Eldercare and work-role conflict: Toward an understanding of gender differences in caregiver burden. The Gerontologist 35(3): 340-348.
41. Lalive, R. and Zweimüller, J. (2005). Does parental leave affect fertility and return-to-work? Evidence from a "true natural experiment". Bonn: Institut für die Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1613).
42. Lamura, G., Döhner, H., and Kofahl, C. (2008). Family carers of older people in Europe. Münster: LIT-Verlag.
43. Leira, A. (2006). Parenthood change and policy reforms in Scandinavia. 1970s-2000s. In: Ellingsaeter, A. and Leira, A. (eds.). Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender relations in welfare states. Bristol: Policy Press: 27-52.
44. Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism. The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies 5(4): 353-375.
45. Lewis, J. (2009). Work-family balance, gender and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
46. Lewis, J., Campbell, M., and Huerta, C. (2008). Patterns of paid and unpaid work in Western Europe: Gender, commodification, preferences and the implications for policy. Journal of European Social Policy 18(1): 21-37.
47. McDonald, P. (2009). Social policy principles applied to reform of gender egalitarisanism in parenthood and employment. In: Gornick, J.C. and Meyer, M.K. (eds.). Gender equality. Transforming family divisions of labor. New York: Verso: 161-176.
48. Multilinks Data Base (2011) http://multilinks-database.wzb.eu/ (last accessed April 16, 2011).
49. Naldini, M. and Saraceno, C. (2008). Social and family policies in Italy: Not totally frozen but far from structural reforms. Social Policy & Administration 42(7): 733-748.
50. O'Brien, M. (2009). Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: International perspectives and policy impact. The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 624(1): 190-213.
51. O'Connor, J., Orloff, A.S., and Shaver, S. (1999). States, markets, and families: Gender, liberalism, and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. OECD (2005). Long-term care for older people. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
53. Orloff, A.S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare state. American Sociological Review 58(3): 303-328.
54. Orloff, A.S. (2009a). Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: An unfinished agenda. Sociological Theory 27(3): 317-343.
55. Orloff, A.S. (2009b). Should feminists aim for gender symmetry? Why a dual-earner/dual-caregiver society is not every feminist's utopia. In: Gornick, J.C., and Meyer, M.K. (eds.). Gender equality. Transforming family divisions of labor. New York: Verso: 129-160.
56. Pacolet, J., Bouten, R., Lanoye, H., and Versieck, K. (2000). Social protection for dependency in old age. Aldershot: Ashgate.
57. Plantenga, J., and Remery, C. (2005). Reconciliation of work and private life: A comparative review of thirty European countries. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (EGGSIE Report).
58. Rauch, D. (2007). Is there really a Scandinavian social service model? Acta Sociologica 50(3): 249-269.
59. Ray, R., Gornick, J.C., and Schmitt, J. (2010). Who cares? Assessing generosity and gender equality in parental leave policy designs in 21 countries. Journal of European Social Policy 20(3): 196-216.
60. Sainsbury, D. (1996). Gender, equality and welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Saraceno, C. (1997). Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare. In: OECD (ed.). Family, market and community. Social Policy Studies No. 21. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: 81-100.
62. Saraceno, C. (2000). Gendered policies: Family obligations and social policies in Europe. In: Boje, T.P. and Leira, A. (eds.). Gender, welfare state and the market. London: Routledge: 135-156.
63. Saraceno, C. (2010). Social inequalities in facing old-age dependency: A bi-generational perspective. Journal of European Social Policy 20(1): 32-44.
64. Saraceno, C. and Keck, W. (2010). Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies 12(5): 675-696. (first published on June 25, 2010).
65. Sarkisian, N. and Gerstel, N. (2004). Explaining the gender gap in help to parents: The importance of employment. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(2): 431-451.
66. Scruggs, L. and Allan, J. (2008). Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD countries: A replication and revision. Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 55-72.
67. Skevik, A. (2005). Women's citizenship in the time of activation. The case of lone mothers in "need-based" welfare states. Social Politics 12(1): 42-66.
68. Statistisches Bundesamt (2009). Pflegestatistik 2007. Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung. 2. Bericht: Ländervergleich - Pflegebedürftige. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
69. Sullivan, O., Coltrane, S., McAnnally, L., and Altintas, E. (2009). Father-friendly policies and time-use data in a cross-national context: Potential and prospects for future research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 624(1): 234-254.
70. Theobald, H. (2008). Care policies, care labor market and inequality: Sweden, Germany and Italy in comparison. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 18(2): 257-281.
71. Ungerson, C. (2004). Whose empowerment and independence? A cross-national perspective on cash-for-care programmes in four European countries. Ageing and Society 24(2): 189-212.
72. Ungerson, C. and Yeandly, S. (2007). Cash for care systems in developed welfare states. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
73. UNICEF (2008). The child care transition. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
74. Van der Lippe, T., de Ruijter, J., de Ruijter, E., and Raub, W. (2010). Persistent inequalities in time use between men and women: A detailed look at the influence of economic circumstances, policies and culture. European Sociological Review 27(2): 164-179. (Advance Access published January 19th 2010).
75. Waldfogel, J., Higuchi, Y., and Abe, M. (1999). Family leave policies and women's retention after childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. Journal of Population Economics 12(4): 523-546.