Local compression in automated breast ultrasound in the mammographicgeometry

Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1787-1790

  Carson, Paul L ^a,b   Wang, Boyun ^b   Lecarpentier, Gerald L ^a   Goodsitt, Mitchell M ^a   Lashbrook, Chris ^a   Pinsky, Renee ^a   Narayanasamy, Ganesh ^a,b,c   Fowlkes, J Brian ^a,b   Saitou, Kazuhiro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

automated scanning; breast imaging; local compression; remote control

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC COUPLING; ACOUSTIC PATH; AIR PRESSURES; AUTOMATED SCANNING; BREAST IMAGING; BREAST PHANTOM; BREAST ULTRASOUND; COMPRESSION FORCE; DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; FIBER MESHES; FORCE FEEDBACK; HUMAN STUDY; IMAGE FEATURES; IMAGE VOLUME; LATERAL MOVEMENT; LINEAR ARRAY TRANSDUCERS; LOCAL COMPRESSION; MAMMOGRAPHIC; POWER-LOSSES; REFLECTING STRUCTURES; ULTRASOUND SCANNING; EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN; FORCE SENSOR; IMAGING TESTS; JOYSTICK CONTROL; ORIENTED STRUCTURE; PNEUMATIC ACTUATOR; ULTRASOUND BEAMS; VIBROTACTILE FEEDBACK; VISUAL INDICATORS;

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; AUTOMATION; DESIGN; MAMMOGRAPHY; SCANNING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TRANSDUCERS; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ACTUATORS; PNEUMATICS; TISSUE; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

ULTRASONICS;

EID: 80054081296     PISSN: 10510117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2010.5935830     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. K.S. Callahan, D.T. Borup, S.A. Johnson, J. Wiskin, Y. Parisky,"Transmission breast ultrasound imaging: Representative case studies ofspeed of sound and attenuation of sound computed tomographic images," Am.J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 458-459 (2007).
2. N. Duric, P. Littrup, L. Poulo, A. Babkin, R. Pevzner, E. Holsapple, O.Rama, C. Glide, "Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography:First results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE)prototype," Med. Phys. 34, 773-785 (2007).
3. Halliwell M and Curtis S, "Ultrasound Breast Imaging: A 3-dimensional approach, work-in-progress," Toshiba Review: Visions/Ultasound,67-75, (2008).
4. J.A. Shipley, F.A. Duck, D.A. Goddard, M.R. Hillman, M. Halliwell, M.G.Jones, B.T. Thomas, "Automated quantitative volumetric breast ultrasounddata-acquisition system," Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31, 905-917 (2005).
5. Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ, " Breast cancer detectionusing automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographicallydense breasts," Eur Radiol 20, 734-742, (2010).
6. Sinha S.P., M.M. Goodsitt, M.A. Roubidoux, R.C. Booi, G.L. LeCarpentierGL, C.R. Lashbrook, et al., "Automated Ultrasound Scanning on a DualModality Breast Imaging System", Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 26:645-655, (2007).
7. Sinha S.P .,M.A. Roubidoux, M.A. Helvie, A.V. Nees, M.M. Goodsitt MM, etal., "Multi-modality 3D breast imaging with X-Ray tomosynthesis andautomated ultrasound", Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc.:1335-8, (2007).
8. Narayanasamy G, LeCarpentier GL, Roubidoux M, Fowlkes JB, Schott AF,Carson PL, "Spatial registration of temporally separated whole breast 3Dultrasound images," Med. Phys. 36, 4288-4300, PMC2749445, (2009).
9. C. Coussios and R. Roy, "Applications of Acoustics and Cavitation toNoninvasive Therapy and Drug Delivery," Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. Vol. 40,pp. 395-420, 2008.