Argumentation frameworks with necessities

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6929 LNAI, Issue , 2011, Pages 163-176

  Nouioua, Farid ^a   Risch, Vincent ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIV   (France)

Author keywords

abstract argumentation; acceptability semantics; bipolarity; logic programming; necessity relation

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; ACCEPTABILITY SEMANTICS; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; BIPOLARITY; LOGIC PROGRAMS; NECESSITY RELATION; SUPPORT RELATIONS;

LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 80054077396     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Amgoud, L., Besnard, P.: Bridging the gap between abstract argumentation systems and logic. In: Godo, L., Pugliese, A. (eds.) SUM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5785, pp. 12-27. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
2. Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)
3. Boella, G., Gabbay, D.M., Van Der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Support in Abstract Argumentation. In: COMMA 2010, pp. 40-51. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2010)
4. Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 93, 63-101 (1997)
5. Bourguet, J., Amgoud, L., Thomapoulos, R.: Towards a unified model of preference-based argumentation. In: Link, S., Prade, H. (eds.) FoIKS 2010. LNCS, vol. 5956, pp. 326-344. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
6. Brewka, G., Woltran, S.: Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In: International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2010), pp. 102-111 (2010)
7. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex,M.C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 378-389. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
8. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(1), 83-109 (2010)
9. Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Constrained Argumentation Frameworks. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), pp. 112-122. AAAI Press, Lake District (2006)
10. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321-357 (1995)
11. Egly, U., Gaggl, S.A., Woltran, S.: Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks. Argument and Computation 1(2), 147-177 (2010)
12. Gebser, M., Gharib, M., Mercer, R., Schaub, T.: Monotonic Answer Set Programming. Journal of Logic and Computation 19(4), 539-564 (2009)
13. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing 9, 365-385 (1991)
14. Łukaszewicz, W.: Considerations on Default Logic: An Alternative Approach. Computational Intelligence 4, 1-16 (1988)
15. Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105-129. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
16. Nieves, J.C., Cortes, U., Osorio, M.: Preferred extensions as stable models. TPLP 8(4), 527-543 (2008)
17. Kayser, D., Nouioua, F.: From the description of an accident to its causes. Artificial Intelligence 173(12-13), 1154-1193 (2010)
18. Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Semantics for Evidence-Based Argumentation, in Computational Models of Argument. In: COMMA 2008, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 276-284 (2008)
19. Reiter, R.: A Logic for Default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1-2), 81-132 (1980)
20. Wu, Y., Caminada, M., Gabbay, D.: Complete Extensions in Argumentation Coincide with 3-Valued Stable Models in Logic Programming. Studia logica 93(2-3), 383-403 (2009)