Rescuing A Patient In Deteriorating Situations (RAPIDS): An evaluation tool for assessing simulation performance on clinical deterioration

Resuscitation

Volumn 82, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1434-1439

  Liaw, Sok Ying ^a   Scherpbier, Albert ^a   Klainin Yobas, Piyanee ^a   Rethans, Jan Joost ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Clinical performance; Deterioration; Instrument development; Mnemonics; Psychometric testing; Reliability; Simulation; Validity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DETERIORATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; NURSE; NURSING EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; RESCUING A PATIENT IN DETERIORATING SITUATIONS; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; TRAINING; VALIDATION PROCESS; VIDEORECORDING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; EDUCATION, NURSING; EMERGENCY NURSING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; PATIENT SIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054067257     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. DeVita M.A., Braithwaite R.S., Mahidhara R., et al. Use of medical emergency team responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary arrests. Q Saf Health Care 2004, 13:215-224.
2. Leach L.S., Mayo A., O'Rourke M. How RNs rescue patients: a qualitative study of RN's perceived involvement in rapid response teams. Q Saf Health Care 2010, 10.1136/qshc.2008.030494.
3. Naeem N., Montenegro H. Beyond the intensive care unit: a review of interventions aimed at anticipating and preventing in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation 2005, 67:13-23.
4. Cox H., James J., Hunt J. The experiences of trained nurses caring for critically ill patients within a general ward setting. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2006, 22:283-293.
5. McArthur-Rouse F. Critical care outreach services and early warning scoring systems: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2001, 36:696-704.
6. Considine J., Botti M. Who when and where? Identification of patients at risk of an in-hospital adverse event: implications for nursing practice. Int J Nurse Pract 2004, 10:21-23.
7. Jevon P. Treating the critically ill patient 1969, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
8. Fuhrmann L., Østergaard D., Lippert A., Perner A. A multi-professional full-scale simulation course in the recognition and management of deteriorating hospital patients. Resuscitation 2009, 80:669-673.
9. Smith G.B., Poplett N. Impact of attending a 1-day multi-professional course (ALERT™) on the knowledge of acute care in trainee doctors. Resuscitation 2004, 61:117-122.
10. Resuscitation Council (UK) Advanced life support 2006, Resuscitation Council (UK), London.
11. Smith G.B., Osgood V.M., Crane S. ALERT™ - a multiprofessional training course in the care of the acutely ill patient. Resuscitation 2002, 52:281-286.
12. Steen C., Costello J. Teaching pre-registration student nurses to assess acutely ill patients: an evaluation of an acute illness management programme. Nurse Educ Pract 2008, 8:343-351.
13. Allen K. Recognising and managing adult patient who are critically sick. Nurs Times 2004, 100:34-37.
14. Rodgers K.L. Using the SBAR communication technique to improve nurse-physician phone communication: a pilot study. AAACN 2007, 29:7-10.
15. Thomas C.M., Bertram E., Johnson D., The SBAR communication technique: teaching nursing students professional communication skills. Nurs Educator 2009, 34:176-180.
16. Riesenberg L.A., Leitzsch J., Little B.W. Systematic review of handoff mnemonics literature. Am J Med Qual 2009, 24:196-204.
17. Leonard M., Graham S., Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Q Saf Health Care 2004, 13:i885-i890.
18. Arnold J.J., Johnson L.M., Tucher S.J., Malec J.L., Henrickson S.E., Dunn W.F. Evaluation tools in simulation learning: performance and self-efficacy in emergency response. Clin Simul Nurs 2009, 5:e35-e43.
19. Todd M., Manz J.A., Hawkins K.S., et al. The development of a quantitative evaluation tool for simulation in nursing education. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarship 2008, http://www.bepress.com/ijnes/vol5/iss1/art41 [accessed 06.06.10].
20. Kardong-Edgren S., Adamson K.A., Fitzgerald C. A review of currently published evaluation instruments for Human Patient Simulation. Clin Simul Nurs 2010, 6:e25-e33.
21. Gordon J.C., Buckley T. The effect of high-fidelity simulation training on medical-surgical graduate nurses' perceived ability to respond t prevent clinical emergencies. J Contin Educ Nurs 2009, 40:491-498.
22. McGaughey J. Acute care teaching in the undergraduate nursing curriculum. Nurs Crit Care 2004, 14:11-16.
23. Polit D., Beck C.T. The content validity index: are you sure you know what being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs and Health 2006, 29:489-497.
24. Lynn M.R. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986, 35:382-385.
25. Walter S.D., Eliasziw M., Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998, 17:101-110.
26. Devitt J.H., Kurrek M.M., Cohen M.M., Cleave-Hogg D. The validity of performance assessments using simulation. Anesthesiology 2001, 95:36-42.
27. Murray D.J., Boulet J.R., Kras J.F., et al. Acute care skills in anesthesia practice: a simulation-based resident performance assessment. Anesthesiology 2004, 101:1084-1095.
28. Scavone B.M., Sproviero M.T., McCarthy R.J., et al. Development of an objective scoring system for measurement of resident performance on the human patient simulator. Anesthesiology 2006, 105:260-266.
29. Brett-Fleegler M.B., Vinci R.J., Weiner D.L., et al. A simulator-based tool that assesses pediatric resident resuscitation competency. Pediatrics 2009, 121:e597-603.
30. Weller J.M., Bloch M., Young S., et al. Evaluation of high fidelity patient simulator in assessment of performance of anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2003, 90:43-44.
31. Devitt J.H., Kurrek M.M., Cohen M.M., et al. Testing the raters: inter-rater reliability during observation of simulator performance. Can J Anaesth 1997, 44:925-928.
32. Morgan P.J., Cleave-Hogg D., Guest C.B. A comparison of global ratings and checklist scores in undergraduate anesthesia simulator assessments. Acad Med 2001, 76:1053-1055.
33. Regehr G., MacRae H., Reznick R.K., Szalay D. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med 2001, 73:993-997.