Geodynamo models: Tools for understanding properties of Earth's magnetic field

Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors

Volumn 187, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 157-169

  Christensen, Ulrich R ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR SONNENSYSTEMFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Core flow; Core mantle coupling; Dynamo models; Geomagnetic field

Indexed keywords

CONTROL PARAMETERS; CORE FLOW; CORE-MANTLE; CORE-MANTLE BOUNDARY; DYNAMICAL REGIME; DYNAMO MODELS; EARTH'S CORE; EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD; EARTH'S ROTATION; FIELD STRENGTHS; GEODYNAMO MODELS; GEOMAGNETIC FIELDS; LOWER MANTLE; PARAMETER STUDIES; POLAR CAP REGION; POLARITY REVERSAL; REVERSAL MECHANISM; ROTATION AXIS; SELF-CONSISTENT MODEL; TEMPORAL PROPERTY; THERMAL STRUCTURE; VORTEX MOTION;

ELECTRIC GENERATORS; GEOCHRONOLOGY; INTERACTIVE DEVICES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETIC STRUCTURE; ROTATION;

GEOMAGNETISM;

CORE-MANTLE BOUNDARY; GEODYNAMO; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; GEOMORPHOLOGY; MAGNETIC REVERSAL; POLAR REGION; THERMAL STRUCTURE;

EID: 80054064097     PISSN: 00319201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2011.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Alboussiere T., Deguen R., Melzani M. Melting-induced stratification above the Earth's inner core due to the convective translation. Nature 2010, 466:744-747.
2. Amit H., Aubert J., Hulot G. Stationary, oscillating or drifting geomagnetic flux patches? J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115:B07108.
3. Amit H., Leonhardt R., Wicht J. Polarity reversals from paleomagnetic observations and numerical dynamo simulations. Space Sci. Rev. 2010, 155:293-335.
4. Amit H., Olson P., Christensen U. Tests of core flow imaging methods with numerical dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 168:27-39.
5. Aubert J. Steady zonal flows in spherical shell dynamos. J. Fluid Mech. 2005, 542:53-67.
6. Aubert J., Amit H., Hulot G., Olson P. Thermochemical flows couple the Earth's inner core growth to mantle heterogeneity. Nature 2008, 454:758-760.
7. Aubert J., Aurnou J., Wicht J. The magnetic structure of convection-driven numerical dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. 2008, 172:945-956.
8. Aubert J., Dumberry M. Steady and fluctuating inner core rotation in numerical geodynamo models. Geophys. J. Int. 2011, 184:162-170.
9. Aubert J., Labrosse S., Poitou C. Modelling the paleo-evolution of the geodynamo. Geophys. J. Int. 2009, 179:1414-1429.
10. Bloxham J. The expulsion of magnetic flux from the Earth's core. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1986, 87:669-678.
11. Bloxham J. Time-independent and time-dependent behaviour of high-latitude flux bundles at the core-mantle boundary. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2002, 39:1854.
12. Buffett B.A. Tidal dissipation and the strength of the Earth's internal magnetic field. Nature 2010, 468:952-954.
13. Buffett B.A., Bloxham J. Energetics of numerical geodynamo models. Geophys. J. Int. 2002, 149:211-224.
14. Buffett B.A., Christensen U.R. Magnetic and viscous coupling at the core-mantle boundary: inferences from observations of the Earth's nutation. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 171:145-152.
15. Buffett B.A., Glatzmaier G.A. Gravitational braking of inner-core rotation in geodynamo simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001, 27(19):3125-3128.
16. Busse F.H. Thermal instabilities in rapidly rotating systems. J. Fluid Mech. 1970, 44:441-460.
17. Busse F.H., Simitev R. Dynamos driven by convection in rotating spherical shells. Astronom. Nachr. 2005, 326:231-240.
18. Busse F.H., Simitev R. Toroidal flux oscillation as possible cause of geomagnetic excursions and reversals. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2008, 168:237-243.
19. Chandrasekhar S. Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability 1961, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
20. Chen Q.N., Jones C.A. Similarity and dynamic similarity models for large-eddy simulations of a rotating convection-driven dynamo. Geophys. J. Int. 2008, 172:103-114.
21. Christensen U.R. Dynamo scaling laws: applications to the planets. Space Sci. Rev. 2010, 152:565-590.
22. Christensen U.R., Aubert J. Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and applications to planetary magnetic fields. Geophys. J. Int. 2006, 166:97-114.
23. Christensen U.R., Aubert J., Hulot G. Conditions for Earth-like geodynamo models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010, 296:487-496.
24. Christensen U.R., Holzwarth V., Reiners A. Energy flux determines magnetic field strength of planets and stars. Nature 2009, 457:167-169.
25. Christensen U.R., Olson P. Secular variation in numerical geodynamo models with lateral variations of boundary heat flow. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2003, 138:39-54.
26. Christensen U.R., Olson P., Glatzmaier G.A. A dynamo model interpretation of geomagnetic field structures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1998, 25:1565-923 1568.
27. Christensen U.R., Tilgner A. Power requirement of the geodynamo from ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos. Nature 2004, 429:169-171.
28. Christensen U.R., Wicht J. Numerical dynamo simulations. Core Dynamics 2007, 245-282. Elsevier, Amsterdam. G. Schubert (Ed.).
29. Coe R.S., Glatzmaier G.A. Symmetry and stability of the geomagnetic field. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33:L21311.
30. Constable C., Johnson C. A paleomagnetic power spectrum. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2005, 61-73153.
31. Courtillot V., Olson P. Mantle plumes link magnetic superchrons to phanerozoic mass depletion events. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2007, 260:495-504.
32. Davies C.J., Gubbins D., Willis A.P., Jimack P.K. Time-averaged paleomagnetic field and secular variation: predictions from dynamo solutions based on lower mantle seismic tomography. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2008, 169:194-203.
33. Driscoll P., Olson P. Effects of buoyancy and rotation on the polarity reversal frequency of gravitationally driven numerical dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. 2009, 178:1337-1350.
34. Driscoll P., Olson P. Polarity reversals in geodynamo models with core evolution. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2009, 282:24-32.
35. Finlay C.C., Jackson A. Equatorially dominated magnetic field change at the surface of Earth's core. Science 2003, 300:2084-2086.
36. Fournier A., Hulot G., Jault D., Kuang W., Tangborn A., Gillet N., Canet E., Aubert J., Lhuillier F. An introduction to data assimilation and predictability in geomagnetism. Space Sci. Rev. 2010, 155:247-291.
37. Gibbons S.J., Gubbins D., Zhang K. Convection in rotating spherical fluid shells with inhomogeneous heat flux at the outer boundary. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 2007, 101:347-370.
38. Gillet N., Jault D., Canet E., Fournier A. Fast torsional waves and strong magnetic fields within the Earth's core. Nature 2010, 465:74-77.
39. Glatzmaier G.A., Coe R.S., Hongre L., Roberts P.H. The role of the Earth's mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals. Nature 1999, 401:885-890.
40. Glatzmaier G.A., Roberts P.H. A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1995, 91:63-75.
41. Glatzmaier G.A., Roberts P.H. A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal. Nature 1995, 337:203-209.
42. Glatzmaier G.A., Roberts P.H. An anelastic evolutionary geodynamo simulation driven by compositional and thermal convection. Physica D 1996, 97:81-94.
43. Glatzmaier G.A., Roberts P.H. Rotation and magnetism of Earth's inner core. Science 1996, 274:1887-1891.
44. Gubbins D. Mechanism for geomagnetic polarity reversals. Nature 1987, 326:167-169.
45. Gubbins D., Bloxham J. Morphology of the geomagnetic field and implications for the geodynamo. Nature 1987, 325:509-511.
46. Gubbins D., Gibbons S. Low Pacific secular variation. Timescales of the Paleomagnetic Field 2004, 279-286. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. J.E.T. Channell, D.V. Kent, W. Lowrie, J.G. Meert (Eds.).
47. Gubbins D., Masters G., Nimmo F. A thermochemical boundary layer at the base of Earth's outer core and independent estimate of core heat flux. Geophys. J. Int. 2008, 174:1007-1018.
48. Hide R., Roberts P.H. How strong is the magnetic field in the Earth's liquid core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1979, 20:124-126.
49. Holme R. Large-scale flow in the core. Core Dynamics 2007, vol. 8:107-130. Elsevier, Amsterdam. G. Schubert (Ed.).
50. Holme R., Olson N. Core surface modelling from high-resolution secular variation. Geophys. J. Int. 2006, 166:518-528.
51. Hongre L., Hulot G., Khokhlov A. An analysis of the geomagnetic field over the past 2000 years. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1998, 106:311-335.
52. Hori K., Wicht J., Christensen U.R. The effect of thermal boundary conditions on dynamos driven by internal heating. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2010, 182:85-97.
53. Hulot G., Eymin C., Langlais B., Mandea M., Olson N. Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Øersted and Magsat satellite data. Nature 2002, 416:620-623.
54. Hulot G., Le Mouel J.-L. A statistical approach to the Earth's main magnetic field. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1994, 82:167-183.
55. Hulot G., Lhuillier F., Aubert J. Earth's dynamo limit of predictability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2010, 37:L06305.
56. Jackson A. Intense equatorial flux spots at the surface of the Earth's core. Nature 2003, 424:760-763.
57. Jones C.A. Thermal and compositional convection in the outer core. Core Dynamics 2007, vol. 8:131-185. Elsevier, Amsterdam. G. Schubert (Ed.).
58. Jones C.A. Planetary magnetic fields and fluid dynamos. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2011, 43:583-614.
59. Kageyama A., Miyagoshi T., Sato T. Formation of current coils in geodynamo simulations. Nature 2008, 454:1106-1109.
60. Kageyama A., Sato T. Computer simulation of a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. II. Phys. Plasmas 1995, 2(5):1421-1431.
61. Kageyama A., Sato T. Generation mechanism of a dipole field by a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 55:4617-4626.
62. Kelly P., Gubbins D. The geomagnetic field over the past 5 million years. Geophys. J. Int. 1997, 128:315-330.
63. Kono M., Roberts P.H. Recent geodynamo simulations and observations of the geomagnetic field. Rev. Geophys. 2002, 40:1013.
64. Kono M., Sakuraba A., Ishida M. Dynamo simulation and palaeosecular variation models. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 2000, 358:1123-1139.
65. Korte M., Holme R. On the persistence of geomagnetic flux lobes in global Holocene field models. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2010, 182:179-186.
66. Kuang W., Bloxham J. An Earth-like numerical dynamo model. Nature 1997, 389:371-374.
67. Kuang W., Bloxham J. Numerical dynamo modeling: comparison with the Earth's magnetic field. The core-mantle boundary region 1998, 197-208. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. M. Gurnis, M. Wysession, E. Knittle, B. Buffett (Eds.).
68. Kutzner C., Christensen U.R. Effects of driving mechanisms in geodynamo models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2000, 27:29-32.
69. Kutzner C., Christensen U.R. From stable dipolar to reversing numerical dynamos. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2002, 131:29-45.
70. Kutzner C., Christensen U.R. Simulated geomagnetic reversals and preferred virtual geomagnetic pole paths. Geophys. J. Int. 2004, 157:1105-1118.
71. Laj C., Mazaud A., Weeks R., Fuller M., Herrero-Bervera E. Geomagnetic reversal paths. Nature 1991, 351:447.
72. Lanzerotti L.J., Chave A.D., Sayres C.H., Medford L.V., MacLennan C.G. Large-scale electric field measurements at the Earth's surface a review. J. Geophys. Res. 1993, 98:23525-23543.
73. Leonhardt R., Fabian K. Paleomagnetic reconstruction of the global geomagnetic field evolution during the Matuyama/Brunhes transition: iterative bayesian inversion and independent verification. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2007, 253:172-195.
74. Lhuillier F., Fournier A., Hulot G., Aubert J. The geomagnetic secular-variation time scale in observations and numerical dynamo models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38:L09306.
75. Love J.J. Paleomagnetic volcanic data and geomagnetic regularity of reversals and excursions. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103(B6):12435-12452.
76. Matsui H., Buffett B.A. Sub-grid scale model for convection-driven dynamos in a rotating plane layer. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2005, 153:74-82.
77. Matsui H., Buffett B.A. A dynamic self-similarity model for dynamo simulations in a rotating plane layer. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 2007, 101:451-468.
78. Moffatt H.K. Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids 1978, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
79. Nakagawa T., Tackley P.J. Lateral variations in CMB heat flux and deep mantle seismic velocity caused by a thermal-chemical-phase boundary layer in 3D spherical convection. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 271:348-358.
80. Olson P. Laboratory experiments on the dynamics of the core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter 2011, 187:1-18.
81. Olson P., Aurnou J. A polar vortex in the Earth's core. Nature 1999, 402:170-173.
82. Olson P., Christensen U.R. The time-averaged magnetic field in numerical dynamos with nonuniform boundary heat flow. Geophys. J. Int. 2002, 151:809-823.
83. Olson P., Christensen U.R. Dipole moment scaling for convection-driven planetary dynamos. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 250:561-571.
84. Olson P., Christensen U.R., Glatzmaier G.A. Numerical modeling of the geodynamo: mechanism of field generation and equilibration. J. Geophys. Res. 1999, 104:10383-10404.
85. Olson P., Coe R., Driscoll P.E., Glatzmaier G.A., Roberts P.H. Geodynamo reversal frequency and heterogeneous core-mantle boundary heat flow. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2010, 180:66-79.
86. Rau S., Christensen U.R., Jackson A., Wicht J. Core flow inversions tested with numerical dynamo models. Geophys. J. Int. 2000, 141:485-497.
87. Romanowicz B. Global mantle tomography: progress status in the past 10 years. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2003, 31:303-328.
88. Sakuraba A., Roberts P.H. Generation of a strong magnetic field using uniform heat flux at the surface of the core. Nature Geosci. 2009, 2:802-1076 805.
89. Sarson G.R., Jones C.A. A convection driven geodynamo reversal model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1999, 111:3-20.
90. Schrinner M., Radler K.-H., Schmitt D., Rheinhardt M., Christensen U. Mean-field concept and direct numerical simulation of rotating magnetoconvection and the geodynamo. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 2007, 101:81-116.
91. Simitev R., Busse F.H. Prandtl-number dependence of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical fluid shells. J. Fluid Mech. 2005, 532:365-1085 388.
92. Sreenivasan B., Jones C.A. Structure and dynamics of the polar vortex in the Earth's core. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32:L20301.
93. Sreenivasan B., Jones C.A. The role of inertia in the evolution of spherical dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. 2006, 164:467-476.
94. Sreenivasan, B., Jones, C.A., 2011. Helicity generation and subcritical behaviour in rapidly rotating dynamos. J. Fluid Mech. in press.
95. Stellmach S., Hansen U. Cartesian convection-driven dynamos at low Ekman number. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 70:056312.
96. Stevenson D.J. Planetary magnetic fields. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2003, 1095 208:1-11.
97. Stevenson D.J., Spohn T., Schubert G. Magnetism and thermal evolution of terrestrial planets. Icarus 1983, 54:466-489.
98. Takahashi F., Matsushima M., Honkura Y. Simulations of a quasi-Taylor state geomagnetic field including polarity reversals on the Earth simulator. Science 2005, 309:459-461.
99. Takahashi F., Matsushima M., Honkura Y. A numerical study on magnetic polarity transitions in an MHD dynamo model. Earth Planets Space 2007, 59:665-673.
100. Takahashi F., Matsushima M., Honkura Y. Scale variability in convection-driven MHD dynamos at low Ekman number. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2008, 167:168-178.
101. Takahashi F., Tsunakawa H., Matsushima M., Mochizuki N., Honkura Y. Effects of thermally heterogeneous structure in the lowermost mantle on the geomagnetic field strength. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 272:738-746.
102. Valet J.-P., Tucholka P., Courtillot V., Meynadier L. Paleomagnetic constraints on the geometry of the geomagnetic field during reversals. Nature 1993, 356:400-407.
103. Wicht J., Christensen U.R. Torsional oscillations in dynamo simulations. Geophys. J. Int. 2010, 181:1367-1380.
104. Wicht J., Olson P. A detailed study of the polarity reversal mechanism in a numerical dynamo model. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2004, 5:Q03H10.
105. Wicht J., Stellmach S., Harder H. Numerical models of the geodynamo: from fundamental cartesian models to 3D simulations of field reversals. Geomagnetic field variations 2009, 107-158. Springer, Berlin. K.H. Glassmeier, H. Soffel, J.F.W. Negendank (Eds.).
106. Wicht J., Tilgner A. Theory and modeling of planetary dynamos. Space Sci. Rev. 2010, 152:501-542.
107. Willis A.P., Sreenivasan B., Gubbins D. Thermal core-mantle interaction: exploring regimes for locked dynamo action. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2007, 165:83-92.
108. Zatman S., Bloxham J. Torsional oscillations and the magnetic field within the Earth's core. Nature 1997, 388:760-761.
109. Zhang J., Song X., Li Y., Richards P.G., Sun X., Waldhauser F. Inner core differential motion confirmed by earthquake waveform doublets. Science 2005, 309:1357-1360.
110. Zhang K., Fearn D. How strong is the invisible component of the magnetic field in the Earth's core?. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1993, 19:2093-2094.