Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 97-114

  Christensen, U R ^a   Aubert, J ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR SONNENSYSTEMFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^b INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

Convection; Core flow; Dynamo theory; Geomagnetic field; Inner core; Planetology

Indexed keywords

CONVECTION; GEODYNAMO; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; GEOMAGNETISM; INNER CORE; JUPITER; PLANETARY ROTATION; SPHERICAL HARMONICS;

EID: 33745623953     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03009.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Acuña, M.H., Connerney, J.E.P. & Ness, N.F., 1981. Topology of Saturns main magnetic field, Nature, 292, 721-726.
2. Aubert, J., 2005. Steady zonal flows in spherical shell fluid dynamos, J. Fluid Mech., 542, 53-67.
3. Aubert, J., Brito, D., Nataf, H.-C., Cardin, P. & Masson, J.-P., 2001. A systematic experimental study of rapidly rotating spherical convection in water and liquid gallium, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 128, 51-74.
4. Aubert, J. & Wicht, J., 2004. Axial versus equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 221, 409-419.
5. Aurnou, J., Andreadis, S., Zhu, L.X. & Olson, P., 2003. Experiments on convection in Earth's core tangent cylinder, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 212, 119-134.
6. Bloxham, J., 2000a. The effect of thermal core-mantle interactions on the paleomagnetic secular variation, Phil. Trans R. Soc. Lond., A, 358, 1171-1179.
7. Bloxham, J., 2000b. Sensitivity of the geomagnetic axial dipole to thermal core-mantle interactions, Nature, 405, 63-65.
8. Bloxham, J., 2002. Time-independent and time-dependent behaviour of high-latitude flux bundles at the core-mantle boundary, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1854, doi: 10.1029/2001GL014543.
9. Bloxham, J., Gubbins, D., Jackson, A., 1989. Geomagnetic secular variation, Phil. Trans R. Soc. Lond., A, 329, 415-502.
10. Bloxham, J. & Jackson, A., 1992. Time-dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core-mantle boundary, J. geophys. Res., 97, 19 537 -19 563.
11. Braginsky, S.I., 1975. Nearly axisymmetric model of the hydromagnetic dynamo of the Earth I., Geomag. Aeron., 15, 122-128.
12. Buffett, B.A., 2002. Estimates of heat flow in the deep mantle based on the power requirements for the geodynamo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, doi:10.1029/2001GL014649.
13. Buffett, B.A., 2003. The thermal state of the Earth's core, Science, 299, 1675-1677.
14. Buffett, B.A., Huppert, H.E., Lister, J.R. & Woods, A.W., 1996. On the thermal evolution of the Earth's core, J. geophys. Res., 101, 7989-8006.
15. Busse, F.H., Grote, E. & Tilgner, A., 1998. On convection driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells, Studia Geoph. et Geod., 42, 1-6.
16. Cardin, P., Brito, D., Jault, D., Nataf, H.-C. & Masson, J.-P., 2002. Towards a rapidly rotating liquid sodium dynamo experiment, Magnetohydrodynamics, 38, 177-189.
17. Christensen, U.R., 2002. Zonal flow driven by strongly supercritical convection in rotating spherical shells, J. Fluid Mech., 470, 115-133.
18. Christensen, U., Olson, P. & Glatzmaier, G.A., 1998. A dynamo model interpretation of geomagnetic field structures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1565-1568.
19. Christensen, U., Olson, P. & Glatzmaier, G.A., 1999. Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: A systematic parameter study, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 393-409.
20. Christensen, U.R. & Olson, P., 2003. Secular variation in numerical geodynamo models with lateral variations of boundary heat flow, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 138, 39-54.
21. Christensen, U.R. & Tilgner, A., 2004. Power requirement of the geodynamo from ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos, Nature, 439, 169-171.
22. Connerney, J.E.P., 1981. The magnetic field of Jupiter: A generalized inverse approach, J. geophys. Res., 86, 7679-7693.
23. Glatzmaier, G.A., 1984. Numerical simulations of stellar convective dynamos. I. the model and method, J. Comput. Phys., 55, 461-484.
24. Glatzmaier, G.A. & Roberts, P.H., 1995. A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle. Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 91, 63-75.
25. Glatzmaier, G.A. & Roberts, P.H., 1995b. A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal, Nature, 377, 203-209.
26. Glatzmaier, G.A., Coe, R.S., Hongre, L., & Roberts, P.H., 1999. The role of the Earth's mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals, Nature, 401, 885-890.
27. Grote, E., Busse, F.H., Tilgner, A., 1999. Convection-driven quadrupolar dynamos in rotating spherical shells, Phys. Rev. E, 60, 5025-5028.
28. Grote, E., Busse, F.H. & Tilgner, A., 2000. Regular and chaotic spherical shell dynamos. Phys. Earth planet. Int., 117, 259-272.
29. Gubbins, D., 2001. The Rayleigh number for convection in the Earth's core, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 128, 3-12.
30. Gubbins, D., Alfè, D., Masters, G., Price, G.D. & Gillan, M.J., 2004. Gross thermodynamics of 2-component core convection, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 1407-1414.
31. Guillot, T., 1999. A comparison of the interiors of Jupiter and Saturn, Planet Space Sci., 47, 1183-1200.
32. Guillot, T., Stevenson, D.J., Hubbard, W.B. & Saumon, D., 2005. The interior of Jupiter, in: Jupiter, pp. 35-37,eds Bagenal, F., Towling, T.E. & McKinnon, W.B., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
33. Heimpel, M.H., Aurnou, J.M., Al-Shamali, F.M. & Gomez Perez, N., 2004. A numerical study of dynamo action as a function of spherical shell geometry, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 236, 542-557.
34. Hulot, G., Eymin, C., Langlais, B., Mandea, M. & Olsen, N., 2002. Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Oersted and Magsat satellite data, Nature, 416, 620-623.
35. Ishihara, N. & Kida, S., 2002. Dynamo mechanism in a rotating spherical shell: Competition between magnetic field and convection vortices, J. Fluid Dyn., 465, 1-32.
36. Jones, C.A., Soward, A.M. & Mussa, A.I., 2000. The onset of thermal convection in a rapidly rotating sphere, J. Fluid Mech., 405, 157-179.
37. Kageyama, A., Sato, T. & the Complexity Simulation Group, 1995. Computer simulation of a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. Phys. Plasma, 2, 1421-1431.
38. Kono, M. & Roberts, P.H., 2002. Recent geodynamo simulations and observations of the geomagnetic field, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1013, doi:10.1029/2000RG000102.
39. Kuang, W. & Bloxham, J., 1997. An Earth-like numerical dynamo model. Nature, 389, 371-374.
40. Kuang, W. & Bloxham, J., 1999. Numerical modeling of magnetohydrodynamic convection in a rapidly rotating spherical shell: weak and strong field dynamo action, J. Comput. Phys., 153, 51-81.
41. Kutzner, C. & Christensen, U.R., 2000. Effects of driving mechanisms in geodynamo models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 29-32.
42. Kutzner, C. & Christensen, U.R., 2002. From stable dipolar towards reversing numerical dynamos, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 131, 29-45.
43. Kutzner, C. & Christensen, U.R., 2004. Simulated geomagnetic reversals and preferred virtual geomagnetic pole paths, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 1105-1118.
44. Labrosse, S., 2002. Hotspots, mantle plumes and core heat loss, Earth planet Sci. Lett., 199, 147-156.
45. Labrosse, S., Poirier, J.P. & LeMouël, J.L., 2001. The age of the inner core, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 190, 111-123.
46. Lathrop, D.P., Shew, W.L. & Sisan, D.R., 2001. Laboratory experiments on the transition to MHD turbulence, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 43, A151-A160.
47. Loper, D.E., 1978. Some thermal consequences of the gravitationally powered dynamo, J. geophys. Res., 83, 5961-5970.
48. Müller, U., Stieglitz, R. & Horanyi, S., 2004. A two-scale hydromagnetic dynamo experiment, J. Fluid. Mech., 498, 31-71.
49. Nimmo, F., Price, G.D., Brodholt, J. & Gubbins, D., 2004. The influence of potassium on core and geodynamo evolution, Geophys. J. Int., 156, 363-376.
50. Olson, P. & Aurnou, J., 1999. A polar vortex in the Earth's core, Nature, 404, 170-173.
51. Olson, P., Christensen, U.R. & Glatzmaier, G.A., 1999. Numerical modeling of the geodynamo: Mechanisms of field generation and equilibration, J. geophys. Res., 104, 10 383-10 404.
52. Olson, P. & Christensen, U.R., 2002. The time-averaged magnetic field in numerical dynamos with non-uniform boundary heat flow, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 809-823.
53. Ponty, Y., Mininni, P.D., Montgomery, D.C., Pinton, J.F., Politano, H. & Pouquet, A., 2005. Numerical study of dynamo action at low magnetic Prandtl numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 164502.
54. Rotvig, J. & Jones, C.A., 2002. Rotating convection-driven dynamos at low Ekman number, Phys. Rev. E, 66, 056308.
55. Russell, C.T., Yu, Z.J., Khurana, K.K. & Kivelson, M.G., 2001. Magnetic field changes in the inner magnetosphere of Jupiter, Adv. Space Res., 28, 897-902.
56. Schekochihin, A.A., Cowley, S.C., Maron, J.L. & McWilliams, J.C., 2004. Critical magnetic Prandtl number for small-scale dynamo, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 054502.
57. Schekochihin, A.A., Haugen, N.E.L., Brandenburg, A., Cowley, S.C., Maron, J.L. & McWilliams, J.C., 2005. The onset of a small-scale turbulent dynamo at low magnetic Prandtl numbers, Astrophys. J. Lett., 625, 115-118.
58. Simitev, R. & Busse, F.H., 2005. Prandtl-number dependence of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical fluid shells, J. Fluid Mech., 532, 365-388.
59. Starchenko, S.V. & Jones, C.A., 2002. Typical velocities and magnetic field strengths in planetary interiors, Icarus, 157, 426-435.
60. Stanley, S. & Bloxham, J., 2004. Convective-region geometry as the cause of Uranus' and Neptune's unusual magnetic fields, Nature, 428, 151-153.
61. Stanley, S., Bloxham, J., Hutchison, W.E. & Zuber, M., 2005. Thin shell dynamo models consistent with Mercury's weak observed magnetic field, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 234, 341-353.
62. Sreenivasan, B. & Jones, C., 2006. The role of inertia in the evolution of spherical dynamos, Geophys. J. Int., 164, 467-476.
63. Stevenson, D.J., 1979. Turbulent thermal convection in the presence of rotation and a magnetic field: A heuristic theory, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 12, 139-169.
64. Stevenson, D.J., 1982a. Interiors of the giant planets, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 10, 257-295.
65. Stevenson, D.J., 1982b. Reducing the non-axisymmetry of a planetary dynamo and an application to Saturn, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 21, 113-127.
66. Stevenson, D.J., 2003. Planetary magnetic fields, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 208, 1-11.
67. Stieglitz R. & Müller, U., 2001. Experimental demonstration of the homogeneous two-scale dynamo. Phys. Fluids, 13, 561-564.
68. Takahashi, F., Matsushima, A. & Honkura, Y., 2005. Simulation of a quasi-Taylor state geomagnetic field including polarity reversals on the Earth simulator, Science, 309, 459-461.
69. Tilgner, A. & Busse, F.H., 1997. Final amplitude convection in rotating spherical fluid shells. J. Fluid Mech., 332, 359-376.
70. Tilgner, A., 1999. Spectral methods for the simulation of incompressible flow in spherical shells. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 30, 713-724.
71. Voorhies, C.V., 1986. Steady flows at the top of the Earth's core derived from geomagnetic field models, J. geophys. Res., 91, 12 444-12 466.
72. Wicht, J., 2002. Inner-core conductivity in numerical dynamo simulations, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 132, 281-302.
73. Zatman, S. & Bloxham, J., 1997. Torsional oscillations and the magnetic field inside the Earth's core, Nature, 388, 760-763.