Self-report versus medical record - Perinatal factors in a study of infant leukaemia: A study from the Children's Oncology Group

Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 540-548

  Jurek, Anne M ^a,c   Greenland, Sander ^b   Spector, Logan G ^c   Roesler, Michelle A ^c   Robison, Leslie L ^d   Ross, Julie A ^c  

^a EXPONENT INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d ST JUDE CHILDREN S RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

maternal recall; medical records; misclassification; recall bias; reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILDBIRTH; CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; INFANT LEUKEMIA; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MEDICAL RECORD; OXYGEN THERAPY; PERIPHERAL EDEMA; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PROTEIN URINE LEVEL; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; LEUKEMIA; MEDICAL RECORDS; MENTAL RECALL; PERINATAL CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 80054053859     PISSN: 02695022     EISSN: 13653016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01226.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Infante-Rivard C, Jacques L,. Empirical study of parental recall bias. American Journal of Epidemiology 2000; 152: 480-486.
2. Olson JE, Shu XO, Ross JA, Pendergrass T, Robison LL,. Medical record validation of maternally reported birth characteristics and pregnancy-related events: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. American Journal of Epidemiology 1997; 145: 58-67. (Pubitemid 27009058)
3. Spector LG, Xie Y, Robison LL, Heerema NA, Hilden JM, Lange B, et al,. Maternal diet and infant leukemia: the DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor hypothesis: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2005; 14: 651-655. (Pubitemid 40489210)
4. Peters AM, Blair CK, Verneris MR, Neglia JP, Robison LL, Spector LG, et al,. Maternal hemoglobin concentration during pregnancy and risk of infant leukaemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. British Journal of Cancer 2006; 95: 1274-1276. (Pubitemid 44658495)
5. Johnson KJ, Roesler MA, Linabery AM, Hilden JM, Davies SM, Ross JA,. Infant leukemia and congenital abnormalities: a Children's Oncology Group study. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2010; 55: 95-99.
6. Greenland S,. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 38: 1662-1673.
7. Greenland S, Lash TL,. Bias analysis. Ch. 19. In: Modern Epidemiology, 3rd edn. Editors:, Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL,. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008; pp. 345-380.
8. Greenland S,. Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology 2008; 167: 523-529. (Pubitemid 351323317)
9. Carpenter J, Bithell J,. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19: 1141-1164. (Pubitemid 30265928)
10. Drews CD, Kraus JF, Greenland S,. Recall bias in a case-control study of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. International Journal of Epidemiology 1990; 19: 405-411. (Pubitemid 20197584)
11. Casey R, Rieckhoff M, Beebe SA, Pinto-Martin J,. Obstetric and perinatal events: the accuracy of maternal report. Clinical Pediatrics 1992; 31: 200-204.
12. Lederman SA, Paxton A,. Maternal reporting of prepregnancy weight and birth outcome: consistency and completeness compared with the clinical record. Maternal and Child Health Journal 1998; 2: 123-126.
13. Yawn BP, Suman VJ, Jacobsen SJ,. Maternal recall of distant pregnancy events. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998; 51: 399-405. (Pubitemid 28223306)
14. Buka SL, Goldstein JM, Spartos E, Tsuang MT,. The retrospective measurement of prenatal and perinatal events: accuracy of maternal recall. Schizophrenia Research 2004; 71: 417-426. (Pubitemid 39330520)
15. Quigley MA, Hockley C, Davidson LL,. Agreement between hospital records and maternal recall of mode of delivery: evidence from 12 391 deliveries in the UK Millennium Cohort Study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007; 114: 195-200. (Pubitemid 46089448)
16. Rice F, Lewis A, Harold G, van den Bree M, Boivin J, Hay DF, et al,. Agreement between maternal report and antenatal records for a range of pre and peri-natal factors: the influence of maternal and child characteristics. Early Human Development 2007; 83: 497-504. (Pubitemid 47102011)
17. Elliott JP, Desch C, Istwan NB, Rhea D, Collins AM, Stanziano GJ,. The reliability of patient-reported pregnancy outcome data. Population Health Management 2010; 13: 27-32.
18. Ross JA, Severson RK, Pollock BH, Robison LL,. Childhood cancer in the United States. A geographical analysis of cases from the Pediatric Cooperative Clinical Trials groups. Cancer 1996; 77: 201-207. (Pubitemid 26002758)
19. Liu L, Krailo M, Reaman GH, Bernstein L,. Childhood cancer patients' access to cooperative group cancer programs: a population-based study. Cancer 2003; 97: 1339-1345. (Pubitemid 36237322)
20. Kass NE, Natowicz MR, Hull SC, Faden RR, Plantinga L, Gostin LO, et al,. The use of medical records in research: what do patients want? The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2003; 31: 429-433. (Pubitemid 39286367)
21. Lash TL, Fox MP, Fink AK,. Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.