Maternal recall of distant pregnancy events

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 399-405

  Yawn, Barbara P ^a   Suman, Vera J ^b   Jacobsen, Steven J ^c  

^a OLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Section of Biostatistics   (United States)

^c Dept of Health Sciences Research ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Maternal recall; Pregnancy; Prematurity; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RECORD; MOTHER; NORMAL HUMAN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RELIABILITY; SMOKING; SOLUTIO PLACENTAE; UNITED STATES;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031899654     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00304-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Paganini-Hill A., Krailo M.D., Pike M.C. Age at natural menopause and breast cancer risk. The effect of errors in recall Am J Epidemiol. 119(1):1984;81-85.
2. Paganini-Hill A., Ross R.K. Reliability of recall of drug usage and other health-related information. Am J Epidemiol. 116(1):1982;114-122.
3. Daly K.A., Lindgren B., Giebink G.S. Validity of parental report of a child's medical history in otitis media research. Am J Epidemiol. 139(11):1997;1116-1121.
4. Chouinard E., Walter S. Recall bias in case-control studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 48:1995;245-254.
5. Harlow S.D., Linet M.S. Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records. The evidence for accuracy of recall Am J Epidemiol. 129(2):1989;233-248.
6. Brandt L.P., Nielsen C.V. Job stress and adverse outcome of pregnancy. A causal link or recall bias? Am J Epidemiol. 135(3):1992;302-311.
7. Weinberg C.R., Baird D.D., Wilcox A.J. Bias in retrospective studies of spontaneous abortion based on the outcome of the most recent pregnancy. Ann NY Acad Sci. 709:1994;280-286.
8. Neutra R.R., Swan S.H., Hertz-Picciotto I., Windham G.C., Wrensch M., Shaw GMet al. Potential sources of bias and confounding in environmental epidemiologic studies of pregnancy outcomes. Epidemiology. 3(2):1992;134-142.
9. Hertz-Picciotto I., Swan S.H., Neutra R.R. Reporting bias and mode of interview in a study of adverse pregnancy outcomes and water consumption. Epidemiology. 3(2):1992;104-112.
10. Verkerk P.H. The impact of alcohol misclassification on the relationship between alcohol and pregnancy outcome. Int J Epidemiol. 21(Suppl. 1):1992;S33-37.
11. Nielsen C.V., Brandt L.P. Fetal growth, preterm birth and infant mortality in relation to work with video display terminals during pregnancy. Scand J Work Environ Health. 18(6):1992;346-350.
12. Werler M.N., Pober B.R., Nelson K., Holmes L.B. Reporting accuracy among mothers of malformed and nonmalformed infants. Am J Epidemiol. 129(2):1989;415-421.
13. Eaton-Evans J., Dugdale A.E. Recall by mothers of the birth weights and feeding of their children. Hum Nutr Appl Nutr. 40(3):1986;171-175.
14. Hewson D., Bennett A. Childbirth research data. Medical records or women's reports? Am J Epidemiol. 125(3):1987;484-491.
15. Seedman D.S., Slater P.E., Ever-Hadini P., Gale R. Accuracy of mothers' recall of birthweight and gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 94(8):1987;731-735.
16. Githens P.B., Glass C.A., Sloan F.A., Entman S.S. Maternal recall and medical records. An examination of events during pregnancy, childbirth and early infancy Birth. 20(3):1993;136-141.
17. Bryant H.E., Visser N., Love E.J. Records, recall loss, and recall bias in pregnancy. A comparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal women Am J Public Health. 79(1):1989;78-80.
18. Tilley B.C., Barnes A.B., Bergstralh E., Labarthe D., Noller K.L., Colton T., Adam E. A comparison of pregnancy history recall and medical records. Am J Epidemiol. 121(2):1985;269-281.
19. Kurland L.T., Molgaard C.A. The patient record in epidemiology. Scientific American. 245:1981;54-63.
20. Melton L.J. History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Mayo Clin Proc. 71:1996;266-274.
21. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33:1977;159-174.
22. Kraemer H.C. Estimating false alarms and missed event from interobserver agreement. Comment on Kaye Psychol Bull. 92:1982;749-754.
23. Feinstein A.R., Cichetti D.V. High agreement but low kappa. I. The problems of two paradoxes J Clin Epidemiol. 43(6):1990;543-549.
24. Cichetti D.V., Feinstein A.R. High agreement but low kappa. II. Resolving the paradoxes J Clin Epidemiol. 43(6):1990;551-558.
25. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Comparing methods of measurements. Why plotting difference against standard method is misleading Lancet. 346:1995;1085-1087.