Blood product positive patient identification: Comparative simulation-based usability test of two commercial products

Transfusion

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2311-2318

  Anders, Shilo ^a,b,c   Miller, Anne ^a,b,c   Joseph, Peggy ^a,b,c   Fortenberry, Tiercy ^a,b,c   Woods, Marcella ^a,b,c   Booker, Ray ^a,b,c   Slaughter, Jennifer ^a,b,c   Weinger, Matthew B ^a,b,c   France, Daniel ^a,b,c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GERIATRIC RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CLINICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; REGISTERED NURSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL ERRORS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; PATIENT SAFETY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80054044337     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03185.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Goodnough LT, Brecher ME, Kanter MH, AuBuchon JP,. Transfusion medicine. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 338-447.
2. Alter HJ, Klein HG,. The hazards of blood transfusion in historical perspective. Blood 2008; 112: 2617-25.
3. Wagar EA, Tamashiro L, Yasin B, Hilbourne L, Bruckner DA,. Patient safety in the clinical laboratory: a longitudinal analysis of specimen identification errors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130: 1662-8. (Pubitemid 44683794)
4. Dzik WH, Corwin H, Goodnough LT, Higgins M, Kaplan H, Murphy M, Ness P, Shulman IR, Yomtovian R,. Patient safety and blood transfusion: new solutions. Transfus Med Rev 2003; 17: 169-80. (Pubitemid 36900325)
5. Lumadue JA, Boyd JS, Ness PM,. Adherence to a strict specimen-labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood-bank specimens. Transfusion 1997; 37: 1169-72. (Pubitemid 28018691)
6. Burrows JM, Callum JL, Belo S, Etchells E, Leeksma A,. Variable pre-transfusion patient identification practices exist in the perioperative setting. Can J Anesth 2009; 56: 901-7.
7. Linden JV,. Errors in transfusion medicine: scope of the problem. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998; 123: 563-5.
8. Grimm E, Friedberg RC, Wilkinson DS, Aubuchon JP. Souers RJ, Lehman CM,. Blood bank safety practices: mislabeled samples and wrong blood in tube-a Q-probes analysis of 122 clinical laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010; 134: 1108-15.
9. Henneman EA, Avrunin GS, Clarke LA, Osterweil LJ, Andrzejewski C, Merrigan K, Cobleigh R, Frederick K, Katz-Bassett E, Henneman PL,. Increasing patient safety and efficiency in transfusion therapy using formal process definitions. Transfus Med Rev 2007; 21: 49-57. (Pubitemid 44881257)
10. Gonzalez-Porras JR, Graciani IF, Alvarez M, Pinot J, Conde MP, Nieto MJ, Corral M,. Tubes for pre-transfusion testing should be collected by blood bank staff and hand labeled until the implementation of new technology for improved sample labeling: results of a prospective study. Vox Sang 2008; 95: 52-6. (Pubitemid 351799413)
11. Davies A, Staves J, Kay J, Casbard A, Murphy MF,. End to end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses. Transfusion 2006; 46: 352-64. (Pubitemid 43334087)
12. Askeland RW, McGrane S, Levitt JS, Dane SK, Greene DL, VandeBerg JA, Walker K, Porcella A, Herwaldt LA, Carmen LT Kemp JD,. Improving transfusion safety: implementation of a comprehensive computerized bar code-based tracking system for detecting and preventing errors. Transfusion 2008; 48: 1308-17.
13. Aulbach RK, Brient K, Custard K, Gecomo J, Ong Ho J,. Blood transfusions in critical care: improving safety through technology and process analysis. Crit Care Nurs 2010; 22: 179-90.
14. Murphy MF, Kay JD,. Barcode identification for transfusion safety. Curr Opin Hematol 2004; 11: 334-8. (Pubitemid 40221050)
15. Sandler SG, Langeberg A, Carty K, Dohnalek LJ,. Bar code and radio-frequency technologies can increase safety and efficiency on blood transfusions. Lab Med 2006; 37: 436-9. (Pubitemid 44025235)
16. McDonald CJ,. Computerization can create safety hazards: a bar-coding near miss. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 510-6. (Pubitemid 46780674)
17. Patterson ES, Cook RI, Render ML,. Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 540-53. (Pubitemid 35024458)
18. Patterson ES, Rogers ML, Chapman RJ, Render ML,. Compliance with intended use of barcode medication administration in acute and long-term care: an observational study. Hum Factors 2006; 48: 15-22. (Pubitemid 43666520)
19. International Organization for Standardization. ISO9241:11 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Guidance on usability. 1998. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
20. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. ANSI/AAMI HE75: human factors engineering-design of medical devices. 2009. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
21. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H,. Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley and Sons; 2007.
22. Nielsen J, Mack RL,. Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1994.
23. Arndt J, Crane E,. Response bias, yea-saying and the double-negative. J Market Res 1975; 12: 218-20.
24. Moum T,. Yea-saying and mood-of-the-day effects in self-reported quality of life. Soc Indic Res 1988; 20: 117-39.
25. Cooper A, Reimann R, Cronin D,. About face 3: the essentials of interaction design. Indianapolis (IN): Wiley Publishing Co.; 2007. Chapters 18, 19.
26. Weinger MB, Gardner-Bonneau D, Wiklund M, editors. Handbook of human factors in medical device design. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2011.