Applications of graph theory in protein structure identification

Proteome Science

Volumn 9, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Yan, Yan ^a,b   Zhang, Shenggui ^a   Wu, Fang Xiang ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 80054041604     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14775956     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-9-S1-S17     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Williams KL, Gooley AA, Packer NH. Proteome: not just a make-up name. Today's Life Science 1996, 16-21.
2. Searls DB. The roots of bioinformatics. PLoS Computational Biology 2010, 6:1-7.
3. González-Díaz H, González-Díaz Y, Santana L, Ubeira FM, Uriarte E. Proteomics, networks and connectivity indices. Proteomics 2008, 8:750-778. 10.1002/pmic.200700638, 18297652.
4. Pevzner PA. Computational Molecular Biology: An Alogorithmic Approach. 2000, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
5. Jones NC, Pevzner PA. An Introduction to Bioinformatics Algorithms. 2004, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press.
6. Bondy JA, Murty USR. Graph Theory. 2008, New York: Springer.
7. Kannan N, Vishveshwara S. Identification of side-chain clusters in protein structures by a graph spectral method. J. Mol. Biol 1999, 292:441-464. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3058, 10493887.
8. Pertsemlidis A, Fondon I, John W. Having a BLAST with bioinformatics (and avoiding BLASTphemy). Genome Biology 2001, 2(10):1-10.
9. Chothia C, Lesk A. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO Journal 1986, 5:823-826. 1166865, 3709526.
10. Greer J. Comparative modeling methods: application to the family of the mammalian serine proteases. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet 1990, 7:317-334.
11. Chen R. Monte Carlo simulations for the study of hemoglobin fragment conformations. J. Comput. Chem 1989, 10:448-494.
12. Skolnick J, Kolinski A. Simulations of the folding of a globular protein. Science 1990, 250:1121-1125. 10.1126/science.250.4984.1121, 17840193.
13. Wilson S, Cui W. Applications of simulated annealing to peptides. Biopolymers 1990, 29:225-235. 10.1002/bip.360290127, 2328288.
14. Venclovas C, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Numerical criteria for evaluating protein structures derived from comparative modeling. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet 1997, (Suppl 1):7-13.
15. Abagyan R, Totrov M. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J. Mol. Biol 1994, 235:983-1002. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1052, 8289329.
16. Avbelj F, Moult J. Determination of the conformation of folding initiation sites in proteins by computer simulation. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet 1995, 23:129-141.
17. Harel D. Algorithmics: The Spirit of Computing. 1992, New York: Pearson Education.
18. Samudrala R, Moult J. A graph-theoretic algorithm for comparative modeling of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol 1998, 279:287-302. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1689, 9636717.
19. Moon J, Moser L. On cliques in graphs. Israel J. Math 1965, 3:23-28.
20. Augustson JG, Minker J. An analysis of some graph theoretical cluster techniques. Journal of the ACM 1970, 17:571-588.
21. Bron C, Kerbosch J. Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Communications of the ACM 1973, 16:575-577.
22. Little, John D, et al. An algorithm for the traveling salesman problem. Oper. Res 1963, 11:972-989.
23. Chou KC, Nemeth G, Scheraga HA. Energetics of interactions of regular structural elements in proteins. Accts. Chem. Res 1990, 23:134-141.
24. Nemethy G, Scheraga HA. A possible folding pathway of bovine pancreatic RNase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76:6050-6054. 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6050, 411798, 293701.
25. Creighton TE, Chothia C. Electing buried residues. Nature 1989, 339:14-15. 10.1038/339014a0, 2716825.
26. Young L, Jernigan BL, Covell DG. A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition. Protein Sci 1994, 3:717-729. 2142720, 8061602.
27. Guss JM, Freeman HC. Structure of oxidized polar plastocyanin at 1.6 Å resolution [abstract]. J. Mol. Biol 1983, 169:521-563. 10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80064-3, 6620385.
28. Vam de Kamp M, Silvestrini MC, Brunoir M, Van Beumen J, Hali FC, Canters GW. Involvement of the hydrophobic patch of azurin in the electron transfer reactions with cytochrome c551 and nitrite reductase. Eur. J. Biochem 1990, 194:109-118. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19434.x, 2174771.
29. Pelletier H, Kraut J. Crystal structure of a complex between electron transfer partners, cytochrome c peroxidase and cytochrome c. Science 1992, 258:1744-1755.
30. Chen L, Durley RCE, Mathews FS, Davidson VL. Structure of an electron transfer complex: methylamine dehydrogenase, amicyanin and cytochrome c551i. Science 1994, 264:86-89. 10.1126/science.8140419, 8140419.
31. Jones DH, McMillan AJ, Fersht AR. Reversible dissociation of dimeric tyrosil-tRNA synthetase by mutagenesis at the subunit interface. Biochemistry 1985, 245:852-857.
32. Ponder JW, Richards FM. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J. Mol. Biol 1987, 193:775-791. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90358-5, 2441069.
33. Mossing MC, Sauer RT. Stable, monomeric variants of lambda-Cro obtained by insertion of a designed beta-hairpin sequence. Science 1990, 250:1712-1715. 10.1126/science.2148648, 2148648.
34. Anderson JE, Ptashne M, Harrison SC. Structure of the repressor-operator complex of bacteriophage 434. Nature 1987, 326:846-852. 10.1038/326846a0, 3553959.
35. Hall KM. An r-dimensional quadratic placement algorithm. Manag. Sci 1970, 17:219-229.
36. Randic M. Unique numbering of atoms and unique codes for molecular graphs. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci 1975, 15:105-108.
37. Cvetkovic DM, Gutman I. Note on branching. Croat. Chem. Acta 1977, 49:105-121.
38. Patra SM, Vishveshwara S. Classification of polymer structures by a graph theory. Int. J. Quantum Chem 1998, 71:349-356.
39. Hagen L, Kahng AB. New spectral methods for ratio cut partitioning and clustering. IEEE Trans. Comp.Design 1992, 11:1074-1084.
40. Johoson GJ, Biemann K. Computer program (DEQPEP) to aid in the interpretation of high-energy collision tandem mass spectra of peptides. Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom 1989, 18:945-957. 10.1002/bms.1200181102, 2620156.
41. McHugh L, Arthur JW. Computational methods for protein identification from mass spectrometry data. PLoS Computational Biology 2008, 4(2):1-12.
42. Wysockia VH, Resingb KA, Zhang QF, Cheng GL. Mass spectrometry of peptides and proteins. Methods 2005, 35:211-222. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.08.013, 15722218.
43. McLafferty FW, Turecek F. Interpretation of Mass Spectra(Fourth Edition). 1993, California: United Science Books.
44. Pitt JJ. Principles and aplications of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in clinical biochemistry. Clin. Biochem. Rev 2009, 30:19-34. 2643089, 19224008.
45. Marshall AG, Hendrickson CL, Jackson GS. Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: a primer. Mass Spectrom. Rev 1998, 17:1-35. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2787(1998)17:1<1::AID-MAS1>3.0.CO;2-K, 9768511.
46. March RE. Quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry: theory, simulation, recent developments and applications. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom 1998, 12:1543-1554.
47. Na S, Paek E, Cheolju L. CIFTER: automated charge-state determination for peptide tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem 2008, 80:1520-1528. 10.1021/ac702038q, 18247484.
48. Wang P, Polce MJ, Bleiholder C, Paizs B, Wesdemiotis C. Structural characterization of peptides via tandem mass spectrometry of their dilithiated monocations. Int. J. Mass Spectrom 2006, 249-250:45-59.
49. Thomson JJ. Rays of positive electricity and their application to chemical analysis. Proc. Roy. Soc 1913, 89:1-20.
50. Beynon J. The use of the mass spectrometer for the identification of organic compounds. Microchimica Acta 1956, 44:437-453.
51. Biemann K, Cone C, Webster BR, Arsenault GP. Determination of the amino acid sequence in oligopeptides by computer interpretation of their high-resolution mass spectra. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1966, 88:5598-5606. 10.1021/ja00975a045, 5980176.
52. Chamrad DC, Korting G, Stuhler K, Meyer HE, Klose J, et al. Evaluation of algorithms for protein identification from sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2004, 4:619-628. 10.1002/pmic.200300612, 14997485.
53. Wong J, Sullivan M, Cartwright H, Cagney G. msmsEval: tandem mass spectral quality assignment for high-throughput proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:51. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-51, 1803797, 17291342.
54. Futrell JH. Development of tandem mass spectrometry: one perspective. Int. J. Mass Spectrom 2000, 200:495-508.
55. Gray AL, Williams JG, Ince AT, Liezers M. Noise sources in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: an investigation of their importance to the precision of isotope ratio measurements. J. Anal. At. Spectrom 1994, 9:1179-1181.
56. Zhang JF, He SM, Ling CX, Cao XJ, Zeng R, Gao W. PeakSelect: preprocessing tandem mass spectra for better peptide identification. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom 2008, 22:1203-1212. 10.1002/rcm.3488, 18350561.
57. Resing KA, Ahn NG. Proteomics strategies for protein identification. FEBS Letters 2005, 579:885-889. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.12.001, 15680968.
58. Wysocki VH, Tsaprailis G, Simth LL, Mobile B, Protons L. A framework for understanding peptide dissociation. J. Mass Spectrom 2000, 35:1399-1406. 10.1002/1096-9888(200012)35:12<1399::AID-JMS86>3.0.CO;2-R, 11180630.
59. Aebersold R, Goodlett DR. Mass spectrometry in proteomics. Chem. Rev 2001, 101:269-295. 10.1021/cr990076h, 11712248.
60. Protein ID: comparing de novo based and database search methods http://www.bioinformaticssolutions.com/functions db download.php?id=3558.
61. Eng J, McCormack A, Yates J. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amoni acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 1994, 5:976-989.
62. Mann M, Wilm M. Error-tolerant identification of peptides in sequence tags. Anal. chem 1994, 66:4390-4399. 10.1021/ac00096a002, 7847635.
63. Sadygov RG, Cociorva D, Yates JR. Large-scale database searching using tandem mass spectra: looking up the answer in the back of the book. Nature methods 2004, 1(3):195-202. 10.1038/nmeth725, 15789030.
64. Bassil I, Dahiyat, Mayo SL. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 1997, 278:82-87. 10.1126/science.278.5335.82, 9311930.
65. Dancik V, Addona TA, Clauser KR, et al. De novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. J. Comput. Biol 1999, 6:327-342. 10.1089/106652799318300, 10582570.
66. Lu BW, Chen T. Algorithms for de novo peptide sequencing using tandem mass spectrometry. BIOSILICO 2004, 2:85-90.
67. Chen T, Kao MY, Tepel M, et al. A dynamic programming approach to de novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. J. Comput. Biol 2001, 8(3):325-337. 10.1089/10665270152530872, 11535179.
68. Ma B, Zhang K, Hendrie C, et al. PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom 2003, 17:2337-1342. 10.1002/rcm.1196, 14558135.
69. Lu BW, Chen T. A suboptimal algorithm for de novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. J. Comput. Biol 2003, 10:1-12. 10.1089/106652703763255633, 12676047.
70. Frank A, Pevzner PA. PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal. Chem 2005, 77:964-973. 10.1021/ac048788h, 15858974.
71. Yan B, Pan CL, Olman VN, Hettich RL, Xu Y. A graph-theoretic approach for the separation of b and y ions in tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:563-574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti044, 15454408.
72. Taylor JA, Johnson RS. Sequence database searches via de novo peptide sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom 1997, 1(9):1067-1075.