INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT IN LEARNING FROM TEXT AND PICTURES: Risks and Benefits

Avoiding Simplicity, Confronting Complexity: Advances in Studying and Designing (Computer-Based) Powerful Learning Evironments

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 47-56

  Bartholomé, Tobias ^a   Bromme, Rainer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054038480     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789087901189_006     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131-152.
2. Bartholome, T., Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 113-129.
3. Bodemer, D., Plotzner, R., Feuerlein, I., & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning & Instruction, 14, 325-341.
4. Brunken, R., Seufert, T., & Zander, S. (2005). Forderung der Koharenzbildung beim Lemen mit multiplen Repriisentationen [Supporting coherence formation while learning with multiple representations]. Zeitschriftfar Padagogische Psychologie, 19, 61-75.
5. Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5-26.
6. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P.A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds ofCSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open UniversiteitNederland.
7. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56.
8. Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist, 38, 33-41.
9. Hegarty, M., & Just, M.A. (1989). Understanding machines from text and diagrams. In H. Mandi & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition form text and pictures (pp. 171-194). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 717-742.
11. Hom, W. (1983). Leistungsprilfsystem [System for the assessment of performance] (2nd ed.). Gottingen: Hogrefe.
12. Jager, A. O., & Althoff, K. (1983). Der WILDE-lntelligen=test (WIT) [The WILDE intelligence test]. Gottingen: Hogrefe.
13. Jeung, H.-J., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17, 329-343.
14. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
15. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-31.
16. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
17. Keil, F. C., Smith, W. C., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Two dogmas of conceptual empiricism: Implications for hybrid models of the structure of knowledge. Cognition, 65, 103-135.
18. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429-434.
20. Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated texts. Learning & Instruction, 3, 227-238.
21. Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521-562.
22. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647-658.
23. Salomon, G. (1994). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (1999). Einfliisse der Visualisierungsform auf die Konstruktion mentaler Modelle beim Text- und Bildverstehen [Effects of the type of visualization on the construction of mental models during text and picture comprehension]. Zeitschrififiir Experimentelle Psychologie, 46, 217-236.
25. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 251-296.
26. Van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & Tabachneck-Schijf, H. J. M. (2004). Can more help be worse? The over-assisting interface. In Proceedings of the coriference on Dutch directions in HCI ACM International Coriference Proceeding Series. New York: ACM Press.
27. Weidenmann, B. (1989). When good pictures fail. In H. Mandi & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 157-170). Amsterdam: North Holland.