Comparison of radiographical imaging modalities for measuring the diameter of renal masses: Is there a sizeable difference?

BJU International

Volumn 108, Issue 8 B, 2011, Pages

  Mucksavage, Phillip ^a   Kutikov, Alexander ^c   Magerfleisch, Laurie ^b   Van Arsdalen, Keith ^b   Wein, Alan J ^b   Ramchandani, Parvati ^d   Malkowicz, S Bruce ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Division of Urology   (United States)

^c HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

computed tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; radiography; renal tumour size; ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CANCER; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; STUDENT T TEST; TUMOR VOLUME;

HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEPHRECTOMY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 80054028199     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09977.x     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Karakiewicz PI, Suardi N, Capitanio U, et al,. A preoperative prognostic model for patients treated with nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 287-95
2. Hafez KS, Fergany AF, Novick AC,. Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumorsize on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging. J Urol 1999; 162: 1930-3
3. Kutikov A, Egleston BL, Wong YN, Uzzo RG,. Evaluating overall survival and competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma using a comprehensive nomogram. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 311-7
4. Herr HW,. Radiographic vs surgical size of renal tumours after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2000; 85: 19-21 (Pubitemid 30072442)
5. Herr HW, Lee CT, Sharma S, Hilton S,. Radiographic versus pathologic size of renal tumors: implications for partial nephrectomy. Urology 2001; 58: 157-60 (Pubitemid 32728045)
6. Kurta JM, Thompson RH, Kundu S, et al,. Contemporary imaging of patients with a renal mass: does size on computed tomography equal pathological size? BJU Int 2009; 103: 24-7
7. Schlomer B, Figenshau RS, Yan Y, Bhayani SB,. How does the radiographic size of a renal mass compare with the pathologic size? Urology 2006; 68: 292-5 (Pubitemid 44175505)
8. Yaycioglu O, Rutman MP, Balasubramaniam M, Peters KM, Gonzalez JA,. Clinical and pathologic tumor size in renal cell carcinoma: difference, correlation, and analysis of the influencing factors. Urology 2002; 60: 33-8 (Pubitemid 34722941)
9. Kanofsky JA, Phillips CK, Stifelman MD, Taneja SS,. Impact of discordant radiologic and pathologic tumor size on renal cancer staging. Urology 2006; 68: 728-31 (Pubitemid 44633408)
10. Abouassaly R, Lane BR, Novick AC,. Active surveillance of renal masses in elderly patients. J Urol 2008; 180: 505-8
11. Raman JD, Hall DW, Cadeddu JA,. Renal ablative therapy: radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. J Surg Oncol 2009; 100: 639-44
12. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al,. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009; 182: 1271-9
13. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ,. Current concepts-computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277-84 (Pubitemid 350190758)
14. Weight CJ, Fergany AF, Gunn PW, Lane BR, Novick AC,. The impact of minimally invasive techniques on open partial nephrectomy: a 10-year single institutional experience. J Urol 2008; 180: 84-8
15. Irani J, Humbert M, Lecocq B, Pires C, Lefebvre O, Dore B,. Renal tumor size: comparison between computed tomography and surgical measurements. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 300-3 (Pubitemid 32245370)