Impact of discordant radiologic and pathologic tumor size on renal cancer staging

Urology

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 728-731

  Kanofsky, Jamie A ^a   Phillips, Courtney K ^a   Stifelman, Michael D ^a   Taneja, Samir S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR CELL; TUMOR REGRESSION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33750318722     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.04.042     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hafez K., Fergany A., and Novick A. Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence, and TNM staging. J Urol 162 (1999) 1930-1933
2. Guinan P., Sobin L.H., Algaba F., et al., Union International Contre Le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: Workgroup No. 3. Cancer 80 (1997) 992-993
3. Leibovich B., Pantuck A., Bui M., et al. Current staging of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 30 (2003) 481-497
4. Cheville J., Lohse C., Zincke H., et al. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 27 (2003) 612-624
5. Amin M., Corless C., Renshaw A., et al. Papillary (chromophil) renal cell carcinoma: histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 62 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 21 (1997) 621-635
6. Amin M., Tamboli P., Javidan J., et al. Prognostic impact of histologic subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms: an experience of 405 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 26 (2002) 281-291
7. Moch H., Gasser T., Amin M., et al. Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma: a Swiss experience with 588 tumors. Cancer 89 (2000) 604-614
8. Kattan M., Reuter V., Motzer R., et al. A post-operative prognostic nomogram for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166 (2001) 63-67
9. Tsui K., Shvarts O., Smith R., et al. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol 163 (2000) 1090-1095
10. Hofmockel G., Tsatalpas P., Muller H., et al. Significance of conventional and new prognostic factors for locally confined renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 76 (1995) 296-306
11. Gettman M., Blute M., Spotts B., et al. Pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma: significance of tumor classification with the 1997 TNM staging system. Cancer 91 (2001) 354-361
12. Herr H. Radiographic vs. surgical size of renal tumors after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 85 (2000) 19-21
13. Yaycioglu O., Rutman M., Balascubramaniam M., et al. Clinical and pathologic tumor size in renal cell carcinoma: difference, correlation, and analysis of the influencing factors. Urology 60 (2002) 33-38
14. Irani J., Humbert M., Lecocq B., et al. Renal tumor size: comparison between computed tomography and surgical measurements. Eur Urol 39 (2001) 300-303
15. Herr H., Lee C., Sharma S., et al. Radiographic versus pathologic size of renal tumors: implications for partial nephrectomy. Urology 58 (2001) 157-160