Development and validation of the Japanese version of organization-based self-esteem scale

Journal of Occupational Health

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 188-196

  Matsuda, Yoriko ^a   Pierce, Jon L ^b   Ishikawa, Rie ^a  

^a J F OBERLIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Nomological network; Organization based self esteem; Scale development; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; JAPAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY; WORKPLACE;

ADULT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; JAPAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; WORKPLACE;

EID: 80054024573     PISSN: 13419145     EISSN: 13489585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1539/joh.L10129     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bowling NA, Eschleman KJ, Wang Q. A meta-analysis of the predictors and consequences of organizationbased self-esteem. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco (CA); 2008.
2. Pierce JL, Gardner DG. Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: a review of the organizationbased self-esteem literature. J Manage 2004; 30: 591-622.
3. Mauno S, Kinnunen U, Ruokolainen M. Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: a longitudinal study. J Vocat Behav 2007; 70: 149-71.
4. Tharenou P. Employee self-esteem: a review of the literature. J Vocat Behav 1979; 15: 331-46.
5. Pierce JL, Gardner DG, Cummings LL, Dunham RB. Organization-based self-esteem: construct definition, measurement, and validation. Acad Manage J 1989; 32: 622-48.
6. Coopersmith S. The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco (CA): Freeman; 1967.
7. Campbel, JD. Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 59: 538-69.
8. Pierce JL, Gardner DG. Relationships of personality and job characteristics with organization-based self-esteem. J Manage Psychol 2009; 24: 392-409.
9. Korman AK. Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. J Appl Psychol 1970; 54: 31-41.
10. Korman AK. Hypothesis of Work Behavior Revisited and an Extension. Acad Manage Rev 1976; 1: 50-63.
11. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol 2000; 55: 5-14.
12. Shimazu A, Schaufeli WB. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Biosci Trends 2008; 2: 171.
13. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud 2002; 3: 71-92.
14. Shimai S, Utsuki N. Leadership in positive psychology. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science 2008; 21: 1-10 (in Japanese).
15. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ. Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
16. Towers Perrin. Closing the Engagement Gap: A Road Map for Driving Superior Business Performance, Global Workforce Study. Stamford (CT): Towers Perrin; 2007-2008.
17. The Gallup Organization. Grim news for Japan's managers. [Online]. 2005 [cited 2009 Nov 19]; Available from: URL: http://www.gallup.com/
18. Arbuckle JL. Amos user's guide version 17.0. Chicago (IL): SPSS; 2008.
19. Hu L-T, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 1999; 6: 1-55.
20. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen KA, Long JS, editors, Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1993. p.136-62.
21. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1996; 1: 130-49.
22. Schwab DP. Construct validity in organizational behavior. Res Organ Behav 1980; 2: 3-43.
23. Tang TLP, Gilbert PR. Organization-based self- esteem among mental health workers: A replication and extension. Public Pers Manage 1994; 23: 127-34.
24. Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol 1986; 71: 500-7.
25. Yamamoto M, Matsui Y, Yamanari Y. The structure of perceived aspects of self. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 1982; 30: 64-8 (in Japanese).
26. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1965.
27. Morishima M. Organizational network and organizational members' perceptions and behaviors. Keio Studies on Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1988; 14: 3-52 (in Japanese).
28. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Work Redesign. London: Addison-Wesley; 1980.
29. Dunham RB. The measurement and dimensionality of job characteristics. J Appl Psychol 1976; 61: 404-9.
30. Lee J. An analysis of the antecedents of organizationbased self-esteem in two Korean banks. Int J Hum Resour Manage 2003; 14: 1046-66.
31. Kato N. An analysis of perceived organizational support. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of Japanese Association of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Japan: 1995. p.77-9 (in Japanese).
32. Tanaka M. A study on the relation between job satisfaction and stress reactions. Job Stress Res 1998; 5: 72-81 (in Japanese).
33. McLean AA. Work stress. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1979.
34. Shimazu A, Schaufeli WB, Kosugi S, et al. Work engagement in Japan: validation of the Japanese version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Appl Psychol 2008; 57: 510-23.
35. Tanaka K. The development of the Japanese version of the organizational citizenship behavior scale. Japanese Association of Industrial/Organizational Psychology Journal 2002; 15: 77-88 (in Japanese).
36. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
37. Coffman DL, MacCallum RC. Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behav Res 2005; 40: 235-59.
38. Byrne BM. Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using AMOS Graphics: A Road Less Traveled. Struct Equ Model 2004; 11: 272-300.
39. Widaman KF, Reise SP. Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In Bryant KJ, Windle M, West SG, editors, The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research. Washington, DC: Psychological Association; 1997. p. 281-324.
40. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
41. Shimazu A. Schaufeli W.B. Is workaholism good or bad for employee well-being? the distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement among Japanese employees. Ind Health 2009; 47: 495-502.