|
Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 387-392
|
Laparoscopy or laparotomy for endometrial cancer? A review of three prospective randomised trials
|
Author keywords
endometrial cancer; laparoscopy; laparotomy
|
Indexed keywords
ANALGESIC AGENT;
ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;
HEMOGLOBIN;
ANALGESIA;
BLADDER INJURY;
BLEEDING;
BODY IMAGE;
CANCER GRADING;
CANCER STAGING;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
ENDOMETRIUM CANCER;
FEVER;
HEART ARRHYTHMIA;
HEART DISEASE;
HEMATOMA;
HUMAN;
HYSTERECTOMY;
ILEUS;
INFECTION;
LAPAROSCOPY;
LAPAROTOMY;
LENGTH OF STAY;
LUNG DISEASE;
OPERATION DURATION;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);
REVIEW;
TRANSFUSION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
URETER INJURY;
WOUND DEHISCENCE;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
CARCINOMA, ENDOMETRIOID;
ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LAPAROSCOPY;
LAPAROTOMY;
PATIENT SELECTION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
|
EID: 80054023227
PISSN: 00048666
EISSN: 1479828X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01306.x Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (10)
|