Prevalence and psychiatric comorbidity of self-reported electromagnetic field sensitivity in Taiwan: A population-based study

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

Volumn 110, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 634-641

  Meg Tseng, Mei Chih ^a,b   Lin, Yi Ping ^c   Cheng, Tsun Jen ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity; Epidemiology; Psychiatric morbidity; Risk perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC HYPERSENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HYPERSENSITIVITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; PERCEPTION; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTOR; SELF REPORT; SELF REPORTED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD SENSITIVITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TAIWAN; WELLBEING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ENVIRONMENTAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; SENSATION; TAIWAN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054023205     PISSN: None     EISSN: 09296646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Liden C., Wahlberg J.E. Work with video display terminals among office employees. V. Dermatologic factors. Scand J Work Environ Health 1985, 11:489-493.
2. Koh D., Goh C.L., Jeyaratnam J., Ong C.N. Dermatological symptoms among visual display unit operators using plasma display and cathode ray tube screens. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1990, 19:617-620.
3. Berg M., Hedblad M.A., Erhardt K. Facial skin complaints and work at visual display units. A histopathological study. Acta Derm Venereol 1990, 70:216-220.
4. Carmichael A.J., Roberts D.L. Visual display units and facial rashes. Contact Dermatitis 1992, 26:63-64.
5. Bergqvist U., Vogel E., Aringer L., Cunningham J., Gobba F., Leitgeb N., et al. Possible health implications of subjective symptoms and electromagnetic fields. A report prepared by a European group of experts for the European Commission, DG V 1997, National Institute for Working Life, Solna, Sweden.
6. Hillert L., Berglind N., Arnetz B.B., Bellander T. Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey. Scand J Work Environ Health 2002, 28:33-41.
7. Mild K.H., Repacholi M., Deventer Ev., Ravazzani P. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. International workshop on electromagnetic field hypersensitivity, 25-27 October 2004, Prague, Czech Republic 2004, 15-26. WHO Press, Milan.
8. Schrottner J., Leitgeb N. Sensitivity to electricity-temporal changes in Austria. BMC Public Health 2008, 8:310.
9. Levallois P., Neutra R., Lee G., Hristova L. Study of self-reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California. Environ Health Perspect 2002, 110(Suppl. 4):619-623.
10. Schreier N., Huss A., Roosli M. The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland. Soz Praventivmed 2006, 51:202-209.
11. Roosli M. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. Environ Res 2008, 107:277-287.
12. Eltiti S., Wallace D., Zougkou K., Russo R., Joseph S., Rasor P., et al. Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire. Bioelectromagnetics 2007, 28:137-151.
13. Carlsson F., Karlson B., Orbaek P., Ostergren P.O. Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning. Public Health 2005, 119:568-577.
14. Levallois P. Hypersensitivity of human subjects to environmental electric and magnetic field exposure: a review of the literature. Environ Health Perspect 2002, 110(Suppl. 4):613-618.
15. Kipen H.M., Fiedler N. The role of environmental factors in medically unexplained symptoms and related syndromes: conference summary and recommendations. Environ Health Perspect 2002, 110(Suppl. 4):591-595.
16. Bailer J., Rist F., Wittho M., Paula C., Bayerl C. Symptom patterns, and perceptual and cognitive styles in subjects with multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS). J Environ Psychol 2004, 24:517-525.
17. Rubin G.J., Das Munshi J., Wessely S. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies. Psychosom Med 2005, 67:224-232.
18. Bergdahl J., Marell L., Bergdahl M., Perris H. Psychobiological personality dimensions in two environmental-illness patient groups. Clin Oral Investig 2005, 9:251-256.
19. Bergdahl J., Bergdahl M. Environmental illness: evaluation of salivary flow, symptoms, diseases, medications, and psychological factors. Acta Odontol Scand 2001, 59:104-110.
20. Bergdahl J. Psychologic aspects of patients with symptoms presumed to be caused by electricity or visual display units. Acta Odontol Scand 1995, 53:304-310.
21. Frick U., Kharraz A., Hauser S., Wiegand R., Rehm J., Kovatsits Uv., et al. Comparison perception of singular transcranial magnetic stimuli by subjectively electrosensitive subjects and general population controls. Bioelectromagnetics 2005, 26:287-298.
22. Landgrebe M., Frick U., Hauser S., Langguth B., Rosner R., Hajak G., et al. Cognitive and neurobiological alterations in electromagnetic hypersensitive patients: results of a case-control study. Psychol Med 2008, 38:1781-1791.
23. Rubin G.J., Cleare A.J., Wessely S. Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones. J Psychosom Res 2008, 64:1-12.
24. Osterberg K., Persson R., Karlson B., Carlsson Eek F., Orbaek P. Personality, mental distress, and subjective health complaints among persons with environmental annoyance. Hum Exp Toxicol 2007, 26:231-241.
25. Bergdahl J., Stenberg B., Eriksson N., Linden G., Widman L. Coping and self-image in patients with visual display terminal-related skin symptoms and perceived hypersensitivity to electricity. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004, 77:538-542.
26. Frick U., Rehm J., Eichhammer P. Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields-a randomized survey study. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2002, 205:353-360.
27. Hung Y.T., Huang Y.C. Telephone sampling: random digit dialing in Taiwan. Election Research 2001, 7:173-184.
28. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys 2006, The American Association for Public Opinion Research, AAPOR, Lenexa, KS. 4th ed.
29. Bureau of National Health Insurance. Caring for the disadvantaged groups. Available from: [accessed 10.07.08]. http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.asp%3fmenu%3d1%26menu_id=%26webdata_ID%3d1941.
30. Derogatis L.R., Lipman R.S., Covi L. The SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale: preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull 1973, 9:13-28.
31. Lee M.-B., Lee Y.-J., Yen L.-L., Lin M.-H., Lue B.-H. Reliability and validity of using a brief psychiatric symptom rating scale in clinical practice. J Formos Med Assoc 1990, 89:1081-1087.
32. Lee M.-B., Liao S.-C., Lee Y.-J., Wu C.-H., Tseng M.-C., Gau S.-F., et al. Development and verification of validity and reliability of a short screening instrument to identify psychiatric morbidity. J Formos Med Assoc 2003, 102:687-694.
33. Department of Statistics Ministry of the Interior Taiwan. Population of 15 years and over by educational attainment. Available from: [accessed 12.01.08]. http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp.
34. Stata statistical software: release 10.0 Stata 2007, Stata Corp, College Station, TX.
35. Bunin G.R., Spector L.G., Olshan A.F., Robison L.L., Roesler M., Grufferman S., et al. Secular trends in response rates for controls selected by random digit dialing in childhood cancer studies: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Am J Epidemiol 2007, 166:109-116.
36. O'Rourke D., Chapa-Resendez G., Hamilton L., Lind K., Owens L., Parker V. An inquiry into declining RDD response rates part I: telephone survey practices. Survey Research 1998, 29:1-4. Available from: http://www.srl.uic.edu/publist/Srvrsch/98v29n2.pdf [accessed 15.01.08].
37. Bureau of National Health Insurance. National statistics Taiwan. Available from: [accessed 10.07.08]. http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Data/791317593071.pdf.
38. Oftedal G., Wilen J., Sandstrom M., Mild K.H. Symptoms experienced in connection with mobile phone use. Occup Med (Oxf) 2000, 50:237-245.
39. Mortazavi S.M.J., Ahmadi J., Shariati M. Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among university students. Bioelectromagnetics 2007, 28:326-330.
40. Bagedahl-Strindlund M., Ilie M., Furhoff A.K., Tomson Y., Larsson K.S., Sandborgh-Englund G., et al. A multidisciplinary clinical study of patients suffering from illness associated with mercury release from dental restorations: psychiatric aspects. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997, 96:475-482.
41. Davidoff A.L., Fogarty L. Psychogenic origins of multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome: a critical review of the research literature. Arch Environ Health 1994, 49:316-325.
42. Wise T.N. Update on consultation-liaison psychiatry (psychosomatic medicine). Curr Opin Psychiatry 2008, 21:196-200.
43. Sykes R. Somatoform disorders in DSM-IV: mental or physical disorders?. J Psychosom Res 2006, 60:341-344.
44. Rief W., Isaac M. Are somatoform disorders 'mental disorders'? A contribution to the current debate. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2007, 20:143-146.
45. Dimsdale J.E., Dantzer R. A biological substrate for somatoform disorders: importance of pathophysiology. Psychosom Med 2007, 69:850-854.
46. Landgrebe M., Barta W., Rosengarth K., Frick U., Hauser S., Langguth B., et al. Neuronal correlates of symptom formation in functional somatic syndromes: a fMRI study. Neuroimage 2008, 41:1336-1344.