Evoked potentials in large-scale cortical networks elicited by TMS of the visual cortex

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1734-1746

  Garcia, Javier O ^a   Grossman, Emily D ^a   Srinivasan, Ramesh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electroencephalogram; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MALE; NEURONAVIGATION; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADULT; ALPHA RHYTHM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; PARIETAL LOBE; THETA RHYTHM; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054012550     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00739.2010     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Amassian VE, Cracco RQ, Maccabee PJ, Cracco JB, Rudell A, Eberle L. Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74: 458-462, 1989.
2. Amassian VE, Maccabee PJ, Cracco RQ, Cracco JB, Somasundaram M, Rothwell JC, Eberle L, Henry K, Rudell AP. The polarity of the induced electric field influences magnetic coil inhibition of human visual cortex: implications for the site of excitation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93: 21-26, 1994.
3. Amassian VE, Rothwell JC, Cracco RQ, Maccabee PJ, Vergara M, Hassan N, Eberle L. What is excited by near-threshold twin magnetic stimuli over human cerebral cortex? J Physiol London 506P: 122P-123P, 1998.
4. Arai N, Okabe S, Furubayashi T, Mochizuki H, Iwata NK, Hanajima R, Terao Y, Ugawa Y. Differences in after-effect between monophasic and biphasic high-frequency rTMS of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 2227-2233, 2007.
5. Arai N, Okabe S, Furubayashi T, Terao Y, Yuasa K, Ugawa Y. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 116: 605-613, 2005.
6. Babiloni F, Babiloni C, Carducci F, Fattorini L, Anello C, Onorati P, Urbano A. High resolution EEG: A new model-dependent spatial deblurring method using a realistically-shaped MR-constructed subject's head model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 102: 69-80, 1997.
7. Bassett DS, Bullmore E. Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist 12: 512-523, 2006.
8. Baudewig J, Siebner HR, Bestmann S, Tergau F, Tings T, Paulus W, Frahm J. Functional MRI of cortical activations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroreport 12: 3543-3548, 2001.
9. Bohning DE, Shastri A, Nahas Z, Lorberbaum JP, Andersen SW, Dannels WR, Haxthausen EU, Vincent DJ, George MS. Echoplanar BOLD fMRI of brain activation induced by concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation. Invest Radiol 33: 336-340, 1998.
10. Bonato C, Miniussi C, Rossini PM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: a TMS/EEG co-registration study. Clin Neurophysiol 117: 1699-1707, 2006.
11. Born RT, Bradley DC. Structure and function of visual area MT. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 157, 2005.
12. Brainard DH. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436, 1997.
13. Braitenberg V, Schuz A. Anatomy of the Cortex: Statistics and Geometry. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
14. Brasil-Neto JP, Cohen LG, Panizza M, Nilsson J, Roth BJ, Hallett M. Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity. J Clin Neurophysiol 9: 132-136, 1992.
15. Campana G, Cowey A, Walsh V. Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: a test of perceptual memory. Cereb Cortex 12: 663-669, 2002.
16. Corthout E, Uttl B, Walsh V, Hallett M, Cowey A. Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroreport 10: 2631-2634, 1999.
17. Corthout E, Barker AT, Cowey A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Which part of the current waveform causes the stimulation? Exp Brain Res 141: 128-132, 2001.
18. Day BL, Dressler D, Maertens de Noordhout A, Marsden CD, Nakashima K, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD. Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol 412: 449-473, 1989.
19. De Lucia M, Parker GJ, Embleton K, Newton JM, Walsh V. Diffusion tensor MRI-based estimation of the influence of brain tissue anisotropy on the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 36: 1159-1170, 2007.
20. Edelman GM. The Remembered Present: a Biological Theory of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books, 1989.
21. Engel SA, Rumelhart DE, Wandell BA, Lee AT, Glover GH, Chichilnisky EJ, Shadlen MN. fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature 369: 525, 1994.
22. Fitzpatrick SM, Rothman DL. Meeting report: transcranial magnetic stimulation and studies of human cognition. J Cogn Neurosci 12: 704-709, 2000.
23. Fox P, Ingham R, George MS, Mayberg H, Ingham J, Roby J, Martin C, Jerabek P. Imaging human intra-cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS. Neuroreport 8: 2787-2791, 1997.
24. Fox PT, Narayana S, Tandon N, Sandoval H, Fox SP, Kochunov P, Lancaster JL. Column-based model of electric field excitation of cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 22: 1-14, 2004.
25. Fuggetta G, Fiaschi A, Manganotti P. Modulation of cortical oscillatory activities induced by varying single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity over the left primary motor area: a combined EEG and TMS study. Neuroimage 27: 896-908, 2005.
26. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 15: 870-878, 2002.
27. Grill-Spector K, Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res 41: 1409-1422, 2001.
28. Harris AR, Schwerdtfeger K, Luszpinski MA, Sandvoss G, Strauss DJ. Adaptive time-scale feature extraction in electroencephalographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007: 2835-2838, 2007.
29. Hotson JR, Anand S. The selectivity and timing of motion processing in human temporo-parieto-occipital and occipital cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 37: 169-179, 1999.
30. Hutsler J, Galuske RA. Hemispheric asymmetries in cerebral cortical networks. Trends Neurosci 26: 429-435, 2003.
31. Ilmoniemi RJ, Virtanen J, Ruohonen J, Karhu J, Aronen HJ, Naatanen R, Katila T. Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity. Neuroreport 8: 3537-3540, 1997.
32. Johnson JS, Hamidi M, Postle BR. Using EEG to explore how rTMS produces its effects on behavior. Brain Topogr 22: 281-293, 2010.
33. Kahkonen S, Komssi S, Wilenius J, Ilmoniemi RJ. Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation produces intensity-dependent EEG responses in humans. Neuroimage 24: 955-960, 2005.
34. Kammer T. Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: their topographic relationship. Neuropsychologia 37: 191-198, 1999.
35. Kammer T, Beck S, Erb M, Grodd W. The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 2015-2021, 2001.
36. Kastner S, Demmer I, Ziemann U. Transient visual field defects induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human occipital pole. Exp Brain Res 118: 19-26, 1998.
37. Laird AR, Robbins JM, Li K, Price LR, Cykowski MD, Narayana S, Laird RW, Franklin C, Fox PT. Modeling motor connectivity using TMS/PET and structural equation modeling. Neuroimage 41: 424-436, 2008.
38. Lamme VA, Roelfsema PR. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends Neurosci 23: 571-579, 2000.
39. Larsson J, Heeger DJ. Two retinotopic visual areas in human lateral occipital cortex. J Neurosci 26: 13128-13142, 2006.
40. Laycock R, Crewther DP, Fitzgerald PB, Crewther SG. Evidence for fast signals and later processing in human V1/V2 and V5/MT+: a TMS study of motion perception. J Neurophysiol 98: 1253-1262, 2007.
41. Meyer BU, Diehl R, Steinmetz H, Britton TC, Benecke R. Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 43: 121-134, 1991.
42. Niehaus L, Meyer BU, Weyh T. Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 111: 75-80, 2000.
43. Nunez PL. Toward a quantitative description of large-scale neocortical dynamic function and EEG. Behav Brain Sci 23: 371-398; discussion 399-437, 2000.
44. Nunez PL. Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
45. Nunez PL, Westdorp AF. The surface Laplacian, high resolution EEG and controversies. Brain Topogr 6: 221-226, 1994.
46. Nunez PL, Srinivasan R. Electric Fields of the Brain: the Neurophysics of EEG. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
47. Okabe S, Hanajima R, Ohnishi T, Nishikawa M, Imabayashi E, Takano H, Kawachi T, Matsuda H, Shiio Y, Iwata NK, Furubayashi T, Terao Y, Ugawa Y. Functional connectivity revealed by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 114: 450-457, 2003.
48. Op de Beeck HP, Baker CI, DiCarlo JJ, Kanwisher NG. Discrimination training alters object representations in human extrastriate cortex. J Neurosci 26: 13025-13036, 2006.
49. Pascual-Leone A, Walsh V. Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science 292: 510-512, 2001.
50. Pascual-Leone A, Walsh V, Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience-virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10: 232-237, 2000.
51. Paus T, Castro-Alamancos MA, Petrides M. Cortico-cortical connectivity of the human mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex and its modulation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 14: 1405-1411, 2001a.
52. Paus T, Jech R, Thompson CJ, Comeau R, Peters T, Evans AC. Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 17: 3178-3184, 1997.
53. Paus T, Sipila PK, Strafella AP. Synchronization of neuronal activity in the human primary motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation: an EEG study. J Neurophysiol 86: 1983-1990, 2001b.
54. Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442, 1997.
55. Romei V, Gross J, Thut G. On the role of prestimulus alpha rhythms over occipito-parietal areas in visual input regulation: correlation or causation? J Neurosci 30: 8692-8697, 2010.
56. Rosanova M, Casali A, Bellina V, Resta F, Mariotti M, Massimini M. Natural frequencies of human corticothalamic circuits. J Neurosci 29: 7679-7685, 2009.
57. Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 2008-2039, 2009.
58. Ruff CC, Blankenburg F, Bjoertomt O, Bestmann S, Freeman E, Haynes JD, Rees G, Josephs O, Deichmann R, Driver J. Concurrent TMS-fMRI and psychophysics reveal frontal influences on human retinotopic visual cortex. Curr Biol 16: 1479-1488, 2006.
59. Ruff CC, Bestmann S, Blankenburg F, Bjoertomt O, Josephs O, Weiskopf N, Deichmann R, Driver J. Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. Cereb Cortex 18: 817-827, 2008.
60. Ruff CC, Blankenburg F, Bjoertomt O, Bestmann S, Weiskopf N, Driver J. Hemispheric differences in frontal and parietal influences on human occipital cortex: direct confirmation with concurrent TMS-fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 21: 1146-1161, 2009.
61. Ruohonen J, Ilmoniemi RJ. Modeling of the stimulating field generation in TMS. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 51: 30-40, 1999.
62. Sack AT, Kohler A, Linden DE, Goebel R, Muckli L. The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS. Neuroimage 29: 1326-1335, 2006.
63. Salvador R, Silva S, Basser PJ, Miranda PC. Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: A modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry. Clin Neurophysiol 122: 748-758, 2010.
64. Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Stadler W, Schabus M, Doppelmayr M, Hanslmayr S, Gruber WR, Birbaumer N. A shift of visual spatial attention is selectively associated with human EEG alpha activity. Eur J Neurosci 22: 2917-2926, 2005.
65. Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Gerloff C, Hummel FC. Spontaneous locally restricted EEG alpha activity determines cortical excitability in the motor cortex. Neuropsychologia 47: 284-288, 2009.
66. Schenk T, Ellison A, Rice N, Milner AD. The role of V5/MT+ in the control of catching movements: an rTMS study. Neuropsychologia 43: 189-198, 2005.
67. Silva S, Basser PJ, Miranda PC. The activation function of TMS on a finite element model of a cortical sulcus. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007: 6657-6660, 2007.
68. Silvanto J, Lavie N, Walsh V. Double dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in visual awareness. Cereb Cortex 15: 1736-1741, 2005.
69. Srinivasan V, Eswaran C, Sriraam N. Approximate entropy-based epileptic EEG detection using artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 11: 288-295, 2007.
70. Stenroos M, Mantynen V, Nenonen J. A Matlab library for solving quasistatic volume conduction problems using the boundary element method. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 88: 256-263, 2007.
71. Stewart LM, Walsh V, Rothwell JC. Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study. Neuropsychologia 39: 415-419, 2001.
72. Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John ER. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150: 1187-1188, 1965.
73. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: an Approach to Medical Cerebral Imaging. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme, 1988.
74. Thompson-Schill SL, Aguirre GK, D'Esposito M, Farah MJ. A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia 37: 671-676, 1999.
75. Van Der Werf YD, Paus T. The neural response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. I Intracortical and cortico-cortical contributions. Exp Brain Res 175: 231-245, 2006.
76. Ziehe A, Laskov P, Muller KR, Nolte G. A linear least-squares algorithm for joint diagonalization. In: 4th International Symposium on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation (ICA 2003). Nara, Japan: 2003, p. 469-474.