Neural network approach for modeling the mass transfer of potato slices during osmotic dehydration using genetic algorithm

African Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 70-77

  Amiryousefi, M R ^a   Mohebbi, M ^a  

^a FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Mass transfer; Modeling; Neural network; Osmotic dehydration; Potato

Indexed keywords

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 80053993450     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1991637X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. AOAC (1990). Association of Official Analysis Chemists Official methods of analysis, Washington.
2. Azuara E, Beristan CI, Gutierrez GF (2002). Osmotic dehydration of apples by immersion in concentrated sucrose/maltodextrin solutions. Food Processing and Preservation, 26: 295-306.
3. Baughman DR, Liu YA (1995). Neural Networks in Bio-Processing and Chemical Engineering. Academic Press, New York.
4. Desai K, Surase SA, Saudagar PS, Lele SS, Singhal S (2008). Comparison of ANN and response surface methodology in fermentation media optimization. Case study of fermentative production of scleroglucan 41: 266-273.
5. Erenturk K, Erenturk S, Tabil LG (2004). A comparative study for the estimation of dynamical drying behavior of Echinacea angustifolia, regression analysis and neural network. Comput. Electronics Agric. 45:71-90.
6. Erenturk K, Erenturk S (2007). Comparison of genetic algorithm and neural network approaches for drying process of carrot. J. Food Eng. 78: 905-912.
7. Hernandez-Perez JA, Garcia-Alvardo MA, Trystram G, Heyd B (2004). Neural networks for the heat and mass transfer prediction during drying of cassava and mango. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 5: 57-64.
8. Huang CY, Chen LH, Chen YL, Chang FM (2009). Evaluating the process of a genetic algorithm to improve the back propagation network. Monte Carlo Stud. 36:1459-1465.
9. Jang SR, Sun CT, Emizutani E (1997). Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing: A computational approach to learning and machine intelligence, Prentice-Hall International, INC., USA.
10. Jiang N, Zhao Z, Reo L (2003). Design of structural modular neural networks with genetic algorithm. Adv. Eng. Software 34: 17-24.
11. Kerr WL, Kerdpiboon S, Devahastin S (2006). Neural network prediction of physical property changes of dried carrot as a function of fractal dimension and moisture content. Food Res. Int. 39: 1110-1118.
12. Ko YD, Moon P, Kim CE, Ham MH, Myonng JM, Yun I (2009). Modeling and optimization of the growth rate for the InO thin films using neural networks and genetic algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 36: 4061-4066.
13. Lisińska G, Leszczynski W (1989). Potato science and technology, London and New York, Elsevier applied science.
14. Maniezzq V (1994). Genetic evolution of the topology and weight distribution of neural network. IEEE Neural Networks. 5: 39-53.
15. Martynenko AI, Yang SX (2006). Biologically inspired neural computation of Ginseng drying rate. Biosyst. Eng. 95: 385-396.
16. Mohebbi A, Taheri M, Soltani A (2008). A neural network for predicting saturated liquid density using genetic algorithm for pure and mixed refrigerants. International Journal of Refrigeration, 31:1317-1327.
17. Movagharnejad K, Nikzad M (2007). Modeling of tomato drying using artificial neural network. Comput. Electronics Agric. 59:78-85.
18. Perrot N, Me L, Trystram G, Trichard JM, Decloux M (1998). Optimal control of the microfiltration of sugar product using a controller combining fuzzy and genetic approaches. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 94: 309-322.
19. Rastogi NK, Nayak CA, Raghavaro KS (2004). Influence of osmotic pretreatment on rehydration characteristics of carrots. J. Food Eng. 6: 287-292.
20. Samanta B, Al-Balushi KR, Al-Araimi SA (2003). Artificial neural network and support vector machine with GENETIC ALGORITHM for bearing fault detection. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 16: 657-665.
21. Yao Z, Le Maguer M (1996). Mathematical modeling and simulation of mass transfer in osmotic dehydration processes. Part I: Conceptual and mathematical model. J. Food. Eng. 29: 349-360.