Integrating parking behaviour in activity-based travel demand modelling: Investigation of the relationship between parking type choice and activity scheduling process

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 154-166

  Nurul Habib, Khandker M ^a   Morency, Catherine ^b   Trepanier Martin M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activity scheduling; Econometric modelling; Land use; Parking; Travel demand

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LAND USE; PARKING; SCHEDULING; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

ACTIVITY SCHEDULING; ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVELS; ACTIVITY-SCHEDULING PROCESS; ECONOMETRIC MODELLING; EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION; TRAVEL DEMAND; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELLING; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMETRICS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND USE; PARADIGM SHIFT; PARKING; TRAVEL DEMAND; URBAN AREA;

CANADA; MONTREAL; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 80053976707     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alberta G., Mahalel D. Congestion tolls and parking fees: a comparison of the potential effect on travel behaviour. Transport Policy 2006, 13(6):496-502.
2. Anderson C., Das C., Tyrell T. Parking preferences among tourists in Newport, Rhode Island. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:334-353.
3. Aptech Systems, 2008. GAUSS User's Manual. Maple Valley, CA.
4. Axhausen K., Polak J. Choice of parking: stated preference approach. Transportation 1991, 18:59-81.
5. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, MIT Press, USA.
6. Bonsall P. The changing face of parking-related data collection and analysis: the role of new technologies. Transportation 1991, 18:83-106.
7. Bonshal P., Palmar I. Modeling drivers' car parking behaviour using data from a travel choice simulator. Transportation Research Part C 2004, 12:321-347.
8. Boraddus, A., 2009. No such thing as a free spot: Pricing a demand management strategy for parking. TRB 2009 Annual Meeting CD-ROM.
9. David G. Parking policy, parking location decisions and distribution of congestion. Transportation 1978, 7:69-85.
10. Falaris E. A nested logit migration model with selectivity. International Economic Review 1987, 28(2):429-443.
11. Habib K., Day N., Miller E. An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area: application of a joint discrete-continuous model. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:639-653.
12. Hensher D. Parking demand and responsiveness to supply, pricing, and location in the Sydney central business district. Transportation Research Part A 2001, 35:177-196.
13. Hunt D., Teply S. A nested logit model of parking location choice. Transportation Research Part B 1993, 27(4):253-265.
14. Ison S., Rye T. Editorial: Parking. Transport Policy 2006, 13(6):445-446.
15. Kelly J.Andrew, Clinch J.Peter Influence of varied parking tariffs on parking occupancy levels by trip purpose. Transport Policy 2006, 13(6):487-495.
16. Khattak A., Polak J. Effect of parking information on travelers' knowledge and behaviour. Transportation 1993, 20:373-393.
17. Lee L.-F. Notes and comments on generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica 1983, 51:507-512.
18. Lindsay C., West D. Spatial price discrimination: the use of parking coupons by downtown retailers. Review of Industrial Organization 1997, 12:417-438.
19. Marsden G. The evidence base for parking policies-a review. Transport Policy 2006, 13(6):447-457.
20. May A., Page M., Hull A. Developing a set of decision support tool for sustainable urban transport in the UK. Transport Policy 2008, 15:328-340.
21. Plaut P. The intra-household choices regarding commuting and housing. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:561-571.
22. RAC Foundation Parking in Transport Policy 2004, RAC Foundation, London.
23. Roorda M., Miller E., Habib K. Validation of TASHA: A 24-hour travel-activity microsimulation model. Transportation Research Part A 2008, 42:360-375.
24. Rye T., Hunton K., Ison S., Kocak N. The role of market research and consultation in developing parking policy. Transport Policy 2008, 15:387-394.
25. Salon D. Neighbourhood, cars, and commuting in New York City: a discrete choice approach. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:180-196.
26. Shiftan Y., Burd-Eden R. Modeling response to parking policy. Transportation Research Record 2001, 1765:27-34.
27. Tong C., Wong S., Leung B. Estimation of parking accumulation profiles from survey data. Transportation 2004, 31:183-202.
28. Van Exel N., Rietveld P. Could you also have made this trip by another mode? An investigation of perceived travel possibilities of car and train travellers on the main travel corridors to the city of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:374-385.
29. Wahsbrook K., Haider W., Jaccard M. Estimating commuter mode choice: a discrete choice analysis of the impacts of road pricing and parking charges. Transportation 2006, 33:621-639.
30. Weinberger, R., Seaman, M., Johnson, C., 2009. Residential off-street parking: Car ownership, VMT and related carbon impacts. TRB 2009 Annual Meeting CD-ROM.
31. Willson R., Shoup D. Parking subsidies and travel choice. Transportation 1990, 17:141-157.