Developing a set of decision-support tools for sustainable urban transport in the UK

Transport Policy

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 328-340

  May, Anthony D ^a   Page, Matthew ^a   Hull, Angela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barriers; Decision support tools; Local transport planning; Sustainable urban transport

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; LAND USE LOCATION; RESEARCH PROGRAM; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 63449120725     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ash A. Trip Chain Modelling in TRL's Strategic Transport Model (2008), TRL, Crowthorne
2. Atkins. Long Term Process and Impact Evaluation of the Local Transport Plan Policy: Interim Report (2005), Department for Transport, London
3. Atkins. Long Term Process and Impact Evaluation of the Local Transport Plan Policy: Final Report (2007), Department for Transport, London
4. Brannigan, C., Paulley, N., 2009. Funding for local authority transport and land use schemes in the UK. Transport Policy, this issue, doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.006.
5. Binsted, A., Brannigan, C., 2008. Local transport funding toolkit for local authorities, DISTILLATE Guidance Note. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
6. Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), 2006. Strong and Prosperous Communities-The Local Government White Paper, Cm 6939-I, TSO, London, October.
7. Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), 2007. An Introduction to the Local Performance Framework-Delivering Better Outcomes for Local People, DCLG, London, November.
8. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998. A New deal for Transport: Better for everyone - White Paper. Available from the DfT website: 〈www.dft.gov.uk〉.
9. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. Guidance on Local Transport Plans (2000), DETR, London
10. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. The New Approach to Transport Appraisal (2000), DETR, London
11. Department for Transport (Dft), 2004. Full Guidance on Local Transport Plans, second ed., December. Available from the DfT website: 〈www.dft.gov.uk〉.
12. Department for Transport. Technical Note about the Assessment of Final Local Transport Plans (2006) (2006), DfT, London
13. Department for Transport. The Transport Innovation Fund (2006), DfT, London
14. Department for Transport, 2007. The NATA Refresh: Reviewing the New Approach to Appraisal, October.
15. European Commission DG Environment. Expert Working Group on Sustainable Urban Transport Plans (2005), DGEnv, Brussels
16. European Commission DG Energy and Transport. Towards a New Culture for Urban Mobility (2007), DGTREN, Brussels
17. European Conference of Ministers of Transport. Urban Travel and Sustainable Development (1995), OECD, Paris
18. European Conference of Ministers of Transport. Implementing Sustainable Urban Travel Policies (2002), OECD, Paris
19. European Conference of Ministers of Transport. Sustainable Urban Travel: Implementing Sustainable Urban Travel Policies: Applying the 2001 Key Messages (2006), ECMT, Paris
20. Forrester, J., Rosen, P., Snell, C., Hull, A., 2008. The DISTILLATE Guide to overcoming organisational and institutional barriers: the importance of partnership working. DISTILLATE Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
21. Forrester, J., 2008. A rapid appraisal geographic information system for out of the box transport option generation. DISTILLATE Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈http://www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
22. HM Treasury. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, Treasury Guidance (2003), TSO, London
23. Hill M., and Hupe P. The multi-layer problem in implementation research. Public Management Review 5 4 (2003) 471-490
24. Hull A.D., and Tricker R. Sustainable urban environments: assessing the barriers to sustainable transport. Engineering Sustainability 158 (2005) 171-180
25. Hull, A.D., Tricker, R., 2006. Project A-interim report. Findings of the 'Phase 1' Survey on the Barriers to the Delivery of Sustainable Transport Solutions. DISTILLATE Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
26. Hull, A.D., Tricker, R., Hills, S., 2006. Interactions between policy sectors and constraints on cross-sector working in the delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Solutions. DISTILLATE Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
27. Hull A.D. Policy integration: what will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities?. Transport Policy 15 (2008) 94-103
28. Jones, P., Lucas, K., 2005. Deliverable B1: option generation literature review, December, DISTILLATE Project Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
29. Jones, P., Thoreau, R., 2007. Engaging Stakeholders in the Redesign of Bloxwich High Street-Developing Techniques for Streetspace Reallocation. DISTILLATE Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
30. Jones, P., Paskins, J., 2008a. Distributional Impacts of Transport Schemes: Winners and Losers of Streetspace Allocation Exercises Case Study: Bloxwich High Street, West Midlands. DISTILLATE Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
31. Jones, P., Paskins, J., 2008b. Distributional Impacts of Sector Strategies and Schemes, Development of a Spreadsheet Tool to Assist in Identifying Cross-Sector Impacts. DISTILLATE Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
32. Jones, P., Thoreau, R., 2008. Strategic problem identification and option generation: the case of accessibility planning. DISTILLATE Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
33. Jopson, A.F., Menaz, B., Page, M., 2007. Appraisal; a barrier to sustainable transport? In: Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Transport Research, Berkeley.
34. Kelly, C., Jopson, A., Menaz, B., Forrester, J., 2008. Small and local scheme assessment tool: tool and method report. DISTILLATE Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
35. Kelly, C.E., May, A.D., Jopson, A.F., 2009. The development of an option generation tool to identify potential transport policy packages. Transport Policy, this issue, doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.008.
36. KonSULT, 2008. Available from the website: 〈www.konsult.leeds.ac.uk〉.
37. Lautso, K., et al., 2004. Planning and Research of Policies for Land Use and Transport for Increasing Urban Sustainability (PROPOLIS): Final Report to the European Commission, Brussels, EC.
38. Liu, R., Sinha, S., 2007. Modellling urban bus service and passenger reliability. In: Proceedings of the INSTR2007: The Third International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability.
39. Marsden, 2008a. Designing a monitoring strategy to support sustainable transport goals. DISTILLATE Guidance Note. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
40. Marsden, 2008b. Advice on selecting indicators for sustainable transport. DISTILLATE Guidance Note. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
41. Marsden, 2008c. Monitoring across sectors and spatial levels for sustainable transport: A good practice guide. DISTILLATE Guidance Note. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
42. Marsden, G., Kelly, C., Snell, C., Forrester, J., 2005. Deliverable C1: sustainable transport indicators: selection and use. December, DISTILLATE Project Report. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
43. Marsden G., Kelly C., and Snell C. Selecting indicators for strategic performance management. Transportation Research Record 1956 (2006) 21-29
44. Marsden G., and May A.D. Do institutional arrangements make a difference to transport policy and implementation? Lessons from Great Britain. Environment and Planning C 24 5 (2006) 771-790
45. May A.D. The development of the UK package approach and the common appraisal framework. Transportation Planning Systems 2 3 (1994) 25-38
46. May, A.D., 2005. Developing sustainable urban land use and transport strategies: a decision-makers' guidebook. Leeds, Institute for Transport Studies, also published in, 〈www.konsult.leeds.ac.uk〉.
47. May A.D., Shepherd S.P., Emberger G., Ash A., Zhang X., and Paulley N. Optimal land use and transport strategies: methodology and application to European cities. Transportation Research Record 1924 (2005) 129-138
48. May A.D., and Crass M. Sustainability in transport: implications for policy makers. Transportation Research Record 2017 (2007) 1-9
49. May, A.D., Page, M., Forrester, J., 2008. Addressing the inconsistencies in appraisal practice. Submission to NATA Refresh, 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
50. MORI, 2001. Public Services Poll, 14 January 2001, 〈www.mori.com/polls/2001/st010112.shtml〉, 1 July 2004.
51. MORI, 2004. Response Order Effects-How Do People Read? 〈www.mori.com/pubinfo/rd/response-order-effects.shtml〉, 1 July 2004.
52. Pfaffenbichler P., Emberger G., and Shepherd S.P. The integrated dynamic land use and transport model MARS. Networks and Spatial Economics 8 2-3 (2008) 183-200
53. Shepherd S.P., Timms P.M., and May A.D. Modelling requirements for local transport plans: an assessment of English experience. Transport Policy 13 (2006) 307-317
54. Shepherd, S.P., Shires, J., Koh, A., Marler, N., Jopson, A., 2006b. Deliverable F2: review of modelling capabilities. Available from the DISTILLATE website: 〈www.distillate.ac.uk〉.
55. Shepherd, S.P., Pfaffenbichler, P., Emberger, G., 2007. Improving the capabilities and use of strategic decision making tools. In: Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Transport Research, Berkeley.
56. Shepherd S.P., Koh A., and May A.D. How to design effective road pricing cordons. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Transport 161 (2008) 155-165
57. Van Vliet D. SATURN-a modern assignment model. Traffic Engineering and Control 23 (1982) 578-581