Use of F-18 fluoride PET to differentiate septic from aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty patients

Clinical Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2011, Pages

  Kobayashi, Naomi ^a   Inaba, Yutaka ^a   Choe, Hyonmin ^a   Ike, Hiroyuki ^a   Fujimaki, Hiroshi ^a   Tezuka, Taro ^a   Hirata, Yasuhide ^a   Tateishi, Ukihide ^a   Inoue, Tomio ^a   Saito, Tomoyuki ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

arthroplasty; aseptic loosening; F 18 fluoride PET; septic loosening

Indexed keywords

FLUORINE 18; OXYGEN 18; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER O 18;

AGED; ARTICLE; ASEPTIC LOOSENING; BACTERIUM DETECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; DRUG UPTAKE; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPTIC LOOSENING; SEROLOGY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FLUORINE RADIOISOTOPES; HUMANS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; ROC CURVE; SEPSIS;

EID: 80053947144     PISSN: 03639762     EISSN: 15360229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182291ae7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kobayashi N, Procop GW, Krebs V, et al. Molecular identification of bacteria from aseptically loose implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1716-1725.
2. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, et al. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:654-663. (Pubitemid 47267235)
3. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, et al. Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3281-3290. (Pubitemid 29455221)
4. Barrack RL, Jennings RW, Wolfe MW, et al. The Coventry Award. The value of preoperative aspiration before total knee revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:8-16. (Pubitemid 28007480)
5. Bauer TW, Parvizi J, Kobayashi N, et al. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:869-882.
6. Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Menashe S, et al. Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(suppl 4):138-147. (Pubitemid 44901982)
7. Schneider R, Freiberger RH, Ghelman B, et al. Radiologic evaluation of painful joint prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;170:156-168. (Pubitemid 12034335)
8. Tehranzadeh J, Schneider R, Freiberger RH. Radiological evaluation of painful total hip replacement. Radiology. 1981;141:355-362. (Pubitemid 12236739)
9. Weiss PE, Mall JC, Hoffer PB, et al. 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate bone imaging in the evaluation of total hip prostheses. Radiology. 1979;133:727-729. (Pubitemid 10215277)
10. Chryssikos T, Parvizi J, Ghanem E, et al. FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1338-1342.
11. Delank KS, Schmidt M, Michael JW, et al. The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, blinded study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:20.
12. Stumpe KD, Notzli HP, Zanetti M, et al. FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy. Radiology. 2004;231:333-341. (Pubitemid 38552886)
13. Zhuang H, Yang H, Alavi A. Critical role of 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the management of patients with arthroplasty. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45:711-718, vii. (Pubitemid 47238395)
14. Grant FD, Fahey FH, Packard AB, et al. Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:68-78.
15. Kobayashi N, Inaba Y, Choe H, et al. Simultaneous intraoperative detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus and pan-bacterial infection during revision surgery: use of simple DNA release by ultrasonication and real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2896-2902.
16. Kobayashi N, Inaba Y, Choe H, et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus periprosthetic infections using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;64:172-176.
17. Kobayashi N, Bauer TW, Tuohy MJ, et al. The comparison of pyrosequencing molecular Gram stain, culture, and conventional Gram stain for diagnosing orthopaedic infections. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:1641-1649. (Pubitemid 44203295)
18. Love C, Marwin SE, Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine and the infected joint replacement. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:66-78.
19. Chacko TK, Zhuang H, Stevenson K, et al. The importance of the location of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in periprosthetic infection in painful hip prostheses. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:851-855.
20. Zoccali C, Teori G, Salducca N. The role of FDG-PET in distinguishing between septic and aseptic loosening in hip prosthesis: a review of literature. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1-5.
21. Reinartz P, Mumme T, Hermanns B, et al. Radionuclide imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty: positron-emission tomography versus triple-phase bone scanning. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:465-470.
22. Nelson CL, McLaren AC, McLaren SG, et al. Is aseptic loosening truly aseptic? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;437:25-30. (Pubitemid 41099062)
23. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Gorman SP, et al. Improved detection of infection in hip replacements. A currently underestimated problem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:568-572. (Pubitemid 28351963)