The role of FDG-PET in distinguishing between septic and aseptic loosening in hip prosthesis: A review of literature

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-5

  Zoccali, C ^a   Teori, G ^a   Salducca, N ^a  

^a REGINA ELENA NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE; TECHNETIUM 99M;

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP SCINTISCANNING; HUMAN; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS;

EID: 59449093766     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0575-2     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. W Becker B Pasurka W Borner 1989 Significance of leukocyte scintigraphy of the infected total endoprosthesis (in German) Rofo 150 3 284 289
2. TK Chacko H Zhuang K Stevenson B Moussavian A Alavi 2002 The importance of the location of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in periprosthetic infection in painful hip prostheses Nucl Med Commun 23 9 851 855
3. Duff GP, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS (1996) Aspiration of the knee joint before revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (331):132-139
4. RH Fitzgerald Jr 1995 Diagnosis and management of the infected hip prosthesis Orthopedics 18 9 833 835
5. AD Hanssen JA Rand 1999 Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty Instr Course Lect 48 111 122
6. GA Hunter RP Welsh HU Cameron WH Bailey 1979 The results of revision of total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 61-B 4 419 421
7. KA Levitsky WJ Hozack RA Balderston RH Rothman SJ Gluckman MM Maslack RE Booth Jr 1991 Evaluation of the painful prosthetic joint. Relative value of bone scan, sedimentation rate, and joint aspiration J Arthroplasty 6 3 237 244
8. Love C, Pugliese PV, Afriyie MO, Tomas MB, Marwin SE, Palestro CJ (2000) Utility of F-18 FDG imaging for diagnosing the infected joint replacement. Clin Positron Imaging 3(4):159
9. Maderazo EG, Judson S, Pasternak H (1988) Late infections of total joint prostheses. A review and recommendations for prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res (229):131-142
10. T Mumme P Reinartz J Alfer R Muller-Rath U Buell DC Wirtz 2005 Diagnostic values of positron emission tomography versus triple-phase bone scan in hip arthroplasty loosening Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125 5 322 329
11. P Reinartz T Mumme B Hermanns U Cremerius DC Wirtz WM Schaefer FU Niethard U Buell 2005 Radionuclide imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty: positron-emission tomography versus triple-phase bone scanning J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 4 465 470
12. KD Stumpe HP Notzli M Zanetti EM Kamel TF Hany GW Gorres GK von Schulthess J Hodler 2004 FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy Radiology 231 2 333 341
13. F Van Acker J Nuyts A Maes B Vanquickenborne J Stuyck J Bellemans S Vleugels G Bormans L Mortelmans 2001 FDG-PET, 99mtc-HMPAO white blood cell SPET and bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasties Eur J Nucl Med 28 10 1496 1504
14. B Vanquickenborne A Maes J Nuyts F Van Acker J Stuyck M Mulier A Verbruggen L Mortelmans 2003 The value of (18)FDG-PET for the detection of infected hip prosthesis Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30 5 705 715
15. H Zhuang TK Chacko M Hickeson K Stevenson Q Feng F Ponzo JP Garino A Alavi 2002 Persistent non-specific FDG uptake on PET imaging following hip arthroplasty Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29 10 1328 1333
16. H Zhuang PS Duarte M Pourdehnad A Maes F Van Acker D Shnier JP Garino RH Fitzgerald A Alavi 2001 The promising role of 18F-FDG PET in detecting infected lower limb prosthesis implants J Nucl Med 42 1 44 48