A spline framework for estimating the EEG surface Laplacian using the Euclidean metric

Neural Computation

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2974-3000

  Carvalhaes, Claudio G ^a,b   Suppes, Patrick ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LETTER; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 80053934230     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00192     Document Type: Letter

References (34)

1. Babiloni, F., Babiloni, C., Fattorini, L., Carducci, F., Onorati, P., & Urbano, A. (1995). Performances of surface Laplacian estimators: A study of simulated and real scalp potential distributions. Brain Topogr., 8, 35-45.
2. Braun, C., Kaiser, S., Kincses,W. E., & Elbert, T. (1997). Confidence interval of single dipole locations based on EEG data. Brain Topogr., 10, 31-39.
3. Carvalhaes, C., Perreau-Guimaraes, M., Grosenick, L., & Suppes, P. (2009). EEG classification by ICA source selection of Laplacian-filtered data. In Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (pp. 1003-1006). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
4. Craven, P., &Wahba, G. (1979). Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numer. Math., 31, 377-403.
5. Darvas, F., Pantazis, D., Kucukaltun-Yildirim, E., & Leahy, R. M. (2004). Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: Methods and validation. Neuroimage, 23 (Suppl. 1), S289-S299.
6. Duchon, J. (1977). Splines minimizing rotation-invariant semi-norms in Sobolev spaces. InW. Schempp & K. Zeller (Eds.), Constructive theory of functions of several variables (pp. 85-100). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. Eubank, R. L., & Eubank, R. L. (1999). Nonparametric regression and spline smoothing (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
8. Fasshauer, G. E. (2007). Meshfree approximation methods with Matlab. Singapore:World Scientific.
9. Gevins, A., Leong, H., Smith, M. E., Le, J., & Du, R. (1995). Mapping cognitive brain function with modern high-resolution electroencephalography. Trends Neurosci., 18, 429-436.
10. Golub, G. H., Heath, M., & Wahba, G. (1979). Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics, 21, 215-223.
11. Golub, G. H., & Varah, J. M. (1996). Matrix computations (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Green, P. J., & Silverman, B. W. (1994). Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: A roughness penalty approach. London: Chapman & Hall.
13. Hansen, P. C. (1998). Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems: Numerical aspects of linear inversion. Philadelphia: SIAM.
14. Harder, R. L., & Desmarais, R. N. (1972). Interpolation using surface splines. J. Aircraft, 9, 189-191.
15. Hjorth, B. (1975). An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 39, 526-530.
16. Jackson, J. D. (1999). Classical electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
17. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2006a). Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns. I: Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. Clin. Neurophysiol., 117, 348-368.
18. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2006b). Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns. II: Adequacy of low-density estimates. Clin. Neurophysiol., 117, 369-380.
19. Law, S. K., & Nunez, P. L. (1991). Quantitative representation of the upper surface of the human head. Brain Topogr., 3, 365-371.
20. Meinguet, J. (1979). Multivariate interpolation at arbitrary points made simple. J. App. Math Phys., 30, 292-304.
21. Nunez, P. L., & Srinivasan, R. (2006). Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of EEG (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Okada, Y. C., Wu, J., & Kyuhou, S. (1997). Genesis of MEG signals in a mammalian CNS structure. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 103, 474-485.
23. Oostenveld, R., & Praamstra, P. (2001). The five percent electrode system for highresolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin. Neurophysiol., 112, 713-719.
24. Perreau Guimaraes, M., Wong, D. K., Uy, E. T., Grosenick, L., & Suppes, P. (2007). Single-trial classification of MEG recordings. IEEE Trans. Biom. Eng., 54, 436-443.
25. Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., & Pernier, J. (1987). Scalp current density mapping: Value and estimation from potential data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 34, 283-288.
26. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 72, 184-187.
27. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1990). Corrigendum EEG 02274. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 76, 565-566.
28. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., Giard, M. H., & Echallier, J. F. (1987). Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 66, 75-81.
29. Schoenberg, I. J. (1946).Contributions to the problem of approximation of equidistant data by analytic functions. Quart. Appl. Math., 4, 45-99, 112-141.
30. Suppes, P., Perreau-Guimaraes,M., &Wong, D. K. (2009). Partial orders of similarity differences invariant between EEG-recorded brain and perceptual representations of language. Neural Comput., 21, 3228-3269.
31. Tucker, D. M. (1993). Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 87, 154-163.
32. Wahba, G. (1981). Spline interpolation and smoothing on the sphere. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 2, 5-16.
33. Wahba, G. (1990). Spline models for observational data. Philadelphia: SIAM.
34. Wang, Z. X., & Guo, D. R. (1989). Special functions. Singapore:World Scientific.