Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of storz modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter

Urology

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 759-763

  Elkoushy, Mohamed A ^a   Hassan, Jacob A ^a   Morehouse, Douglas D ^a   Anidjar, Maurice ^a   Andonian, Sero ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DATA BASE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE FREE INTERVAL; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LITHOTRIPTOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; URETER STENT; URETER STONE;

EID: 80053914244     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. G.M. Preminger, H. Tiselius, and D.G. Assimos Guidelines for the management of ureteral calculi J Urol 178 2007 2418 2434
2. N.L. Miller, and J.E. Lingeman Treatment of kidney stones: current lithotripsy devices are proving less effective in some cases Nat Clin Pract Urol 6 2003 236 237
3. D. Albala, J. Frankel, and M. Ferrandino Efficacy of the Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter Urology 74 2009 S345
4. M. De Sio, R. Autorino, and G. Quarto A new transportable shock wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter BJU Int 100 2007 1137 1141
5. J.M.H. Teichman, A.J. Portis, and P.P. Cecconi In vitro comparison of shock wave lithotripsy machines J Urol 164 2000 1259 1264
6. F.J. Kim, and K.R. Rice Prediction of shock wave failure in patients with urinary tract stones Curr Opin Urol 16 2006 88 92
7. O. Singh, S.S. Gupta, and G. Girish Influence of prognostic factors on the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in upper urinary tract stone disease Int J Nephrol Urol 2 2010 476 480
8. C.F. Ng, D.Y. Siu, and A. Wong Development of a scoring system rrom noncontrast computerized tomography measurements to improve the selection of upper ureteral stone for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy J Urol 181 2009 1151 1157
9. J.D. Wiesenthal, D. Ghiculete, and R.J. Honey Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi Urol Res 38 2010 307 313
10. J.J. Rassweiler, G.G. Tailly, and C. Chaussy Progress in lithotripter technology EAU Update Ser 3 2005 17 36
11. J.D. Denstedt, R.V. Clayman, and G.M. Preminger Efficiency quotient as a means of comparing lithotripters J Endourol 4 suppl 1990 100 103
12. J. Rassweiler, T.O. Henkel, and K.U. Korhrmann Lithotriptor technology: present and future J Endourol 6 1992 1 13
13. B. Benway, R. Venkatesh, and C. Chen Shock wave lithotripsy: comparative analysis of safety and efficacy between first and fourth generation lithotripters J Urol 183 2010 e737
14. H.G. Tiselius How efficient is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones? J Endourol 22 2008 249 255
15. A. Murota-Kawano, K. Ohya, and H. Sekine Outpatient basis extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureter stones: efficacy of the third generation lithotripter as the first line treatment Int J Urol 15 2008 210 215
16. T. Abe, K. Akakura, and M. Kawaguchi Outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: a large scale study at a single institution J Endourol 19 2005 768 773
17. C.F. Ng, A. Wong, and D. Tolley Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the preferred treatment option for elderly patients with urinary stone? A multivariate analysis of the effect of patient age on treatment outcome BJU Int 100 2007 392 395
18. A. Haecker, R. Leistner, and T. Knoll Ex vivo evaluation of renal injury of a new electromagnetic shock wave generator with user selectable dual focus size BJU Int 94 suppl 2004 8
19. K. Suzuki, Y. Yamashita, M. Yoshida, and J. Matuzaki A single center experience with a lithotripsy machine "Modulith SLX-F2": evaluation of dual focus system and clinical results Hinyokika Kiyo 56 2010 81 86
20. R.J. Honey, T.D. Schuler, D. Ghiculete, and K.T. Pace A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones J Urol 182 2009 1418 1423
21. Y. Osman, N. El-Tabey, and H. Refai Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography J Urol 179 2008 198 200
22. A.S. Cass Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi J Urol 153 1995 588 592
23. M.S. Nomikos, S.J. Sowter, and D.A. Tolley Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison? BJU Int 100 2007 1356 1360
24. W. White, and F. Klein Five-year clinical experience with the Dornier Delta lithotripter Urology 68 2006 28 32
25. K.Z. Sheir, K. Madbouly, and E. Elsobky Prospective randomized comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripters J Urol 170 2003 389 392
26. T. Egilmez, M.I. Tekin, and M. Gonen Efficacy and safety of a new-generation shock wave lithotripsy machine in the treatment of single renal or ureteral stones: experience with 2670 patients J Endourol 21 2007 23 27
27. P.M. Jain, N. Goharian, and A.C. Weiser Efficacy and safety of the Healthtronics LithoTron lithotripter J Endourol 18 2004 1 5
28. D.M. Albala, K.M. Siddiqui, and B. Fulmer Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with a transportable electrohydraulic lithotripter: experience with >300 patients BJU Int 96 2005 603 607
29. T.G. Liston, B.S. Montgomery, and M.I. Bultitude Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with the Storz Modulith SL20: the first 500 patients BJU Int 69 1992 465 469
30. K.U. Kohrmann, J.J. Rassweiler, and M. Manning The clinical introduction of a third generation lithotriptor: Modulith SL20 J Urol 153 1995 1379 1383